8 spd 3.21 vs 6 spd 3.92

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

magic280z

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Posts
111
Reaction score
44
Ram Year
2019 1500 Laramie
Engine
Hemi 5.7
There are some definite opinions on here about 3.92 gears. Having just purchased a 3.21 Hemi 8spd truck they would have you feel that the truck can't really do anything and is nothing more than an oversized suv. Now most of us may use our trucks for that doesn't mean they can't also be a truck.

I decided to compare the final drive ratios of both setups and found out some interesting info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.21
1- 15.09
2- 10.05
3- 6.74
4- 5.36
5- 4.14
6- 3.21
7- 2.7
8- 2.15

6-spd (65rfe) 3.92
1- 11.76
2- 6.55
3- 5.88
4- 3.92
5- 2.94
6- 2.63

Looks like the 8spd 3.21 still has the edge over the 6spd 3.92. I know everyone knew the 8 was better than the 6 all else being the same, but this shows how much different the 8spd is. Basically the 8 spd 2-7 is the 6 spd 1-6. You gain a whole lot better first and pretty decent 8th. And the 6 spd really is just a 5spd during linear upshifting. 3rd gear is an optional kickdown gear or it can be used when electronically shifting, but is probably useless being so close to 2nd.

So if you are upgrading from a 6 spd 3.92 truck you should feel comfortable going with the 3.21 gearing you will have better acceleration and fuel economy. If you just want the fastest possible acceleration or need to tow 10,000 lbs then feel free to go 3.92 with the 8spd or go find an r/t with a 4.10 (not sure if 8spd or 6spd).

I added the 3.92 just to have the info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.92
1- 18.42
2- 12.27
3- 8.23
4- 6.55
5- 5.06
6- 3.92
7- 3.29
8- 2.63
 

O.R.T.

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Posts
2,650
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Wessyyydddeee
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi
IMHO this is why the 3.55's are more prevalent now. More of a "middle ground" for the customer to understand why the change happened.
 

crash68

ACME product engineer
Staff member
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Posts
10,781
Reaction score
16,918
Ram Year
2015
Engine
3.0 EcoDiesel
There are some definite opinions on here about 3.92 gears. Having just purchased a 3.21 Hemi 8spd truck they would have you feel that the truck can't really do anything and is nothing more than an oversized suv. Now most of us may use our trucks for that doesn't mean they can't also be a truck.

I decided to compare the final drive ratios of both setups and found out some interesting info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.21
115.09
210.05
36.74
45.36
54.14
63.21
72.7
82.15

6-spd (65rfe) 3.92
111.76
26.55
35.88
43.92
52.94
62.63

Looks like the 8spd 3.21 still has the edge over the 6spd 3.92. I know everyone knew the 8 was better than the 6 all else being the same, but this shows how much different the 8spd is. Basically the 8 spd 2-7 is the 6 spd 1-6. You gain a whole lot better first and pretty decent 8th. And the 6 spd really is just a 5spd during linear upshifting. 3rd gear is an optional kickdown gear or it can be used when electronically shifting, but is probably useless being so close to 2nd.

So if you are upgrading from a 6 spd 3.92 truck you should feel comfortable going with the 3.21 gearing you will have better acceleration and fuel economy. If you just want the fastest possible acceleration or need to tow 10,000 lbs then feel free to go 3.92 with the 8spd or go find an r/t with a 4.10 (not sure if 8spd or 6spd).

I added the 3.92 just to have the info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.92
118.42
212.27
38.23
46.55
55.06
63.92
73.29
82.63

This proves you need to learn how to do math.
How can 3.21 and 3.92 be so close together? There is a 20% difference between the two rear axle ratios, none of your numbers reflect that.
 

charonblk07

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Posts
4,056
Reaction score
2,072
Location
Calgary, Ab
Ram Year
2009
Engine
F1-A forged 349ci
This proves you need to learn how to do math.
How can 3.21 and 3.92 be so close together? There is a 20% difference between the two rear axle ratios, none of your numbers reflect that.

I don't know how you can disagree with the numbers when looking at the final output drive ratio comparison. The differential gear ratio is the constant and the trans gear is the variable, all you do is multiply the trans gear ratio by the differential ratio to get the final drive ratio, no sure where the problem is. Tire diameter will make a difference to what is put to the ground but what's generated by the drivetrain will remain constant regardless of wheel diameter and the difference will be the same on a vehicle with a constant tire diameter but different differential ratios. Here are the 8 speed trans gear ratios, feel free to try your alternative mathematics and let us know what you get.

4.714
3.143
2.106
1.667
1.285
1.000
0.839
0.667

I attached what I got, let's compare; the last colum is the differential percentage, look pretty close to 20% for me.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    28.5 KB · Views: 557
Last edited:

crash68

ACME product engineer
Staff member
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Posts
10,781
Reaction score
16,918
Ram Year
2015
Engine
3.0 EcoDiesel
I don't know how you can disagree with the numbers when looking at the final output drive ratio comparison. The differential gear ratio is the constant and the trans gear is the variable, all you do is multiply the trans gear ratio by the differential ratio to get the final drive ratio, no sure where the problem is. Tire diameter will make a difference to what is put to the ground but what's generated by the drivetrain will remain constant regardless of wheel diameter and the difference will be the same on a vehicle with a constant tire diameter but different differential ratios. Here are the 8 speed trans gear ratios, feel free to try your alternative mathematics and let us know what you get.

4.714
3.143
2.106
1.667
1.285
1.000
0.839
0.667

I attached what I got, let's compare; the last colum is the differential percentage, look pretty close to 20% for me.

I think your mistaking magic280z numbers, I didn't do any of that math. I quoted what he did and pointed out that he couldn't do math. His 3.21 and 3.92 numbers do not make any sense, they are not 20% apart, nor are they even close to the actual numbers.
 

charonblk07

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Posts
4,056
Reaction score
2,072
Location
Calgary, Ab
Ram Year
2009
Engine
F1-A forged 349ci
I think your mistaking magic280z numbers, I didn't do any of that math. I quoted what he did and pointed out that he couldn't do math. His 3.21 and 3.92 numbers do not make any sense, they are not 20% apart, nor are they even close to the actual numbers.

His numbers are just fine when you look at the original post and take into account that the first number of what you quoted are the gear numbers; the bcc code deletes the space in quotes for some stupid reasons and any discrepancy in the decimal points are from the number of significant digits and rounding used. e.g 15.09 vs 15.132; 5.351 vs 5.36; etc. It shouldn't take someone with a minor in math to figure it out but then again, maybe it does since I had to point it out.
 
Last edited:

ExpressRules

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2014
Posts
1,899
Reaction score
1,154
Location
Southern New Jersey
Ram Year
2014 Express Crew Cab & 2019 Big Horn Crew Cab
Engine
Hemi 5.7
^^^mine to and am I the only one that does not stress about gears ie I have 3:92's but the way I drive they might as weel be 2:38's.

I agree about why stress about gears. And why do these types of threads have to turn into a who can **** the furthest contest?

I'm very happy with my 3.55 and when I do need to get into it the extra 1/8 of a second the 3.92 would have gotten me there is of no matter.
 

blrmkrl83

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Posts
270
Reaction score
107
Location
Iowa
Ram Year
2011
Engine
5.7
This proves you need to learn how to do math.
How can 3.21 and 3.92 be so close together? There is a 20% difference between the two rear axle ratios, none of your numbers reflect that.

I took a whole 10 minutes to look up the gear ratios of the transmissions and then figured out the final ratios for a couple of gears on each one. His numbers look close to me. The 6 speed was right on, but the 8 speed was .01 to .02 off from what I got. The place we found the trans ratios must be off just a bit or rounded different.
 

69GWC

Power Wagon
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Posts
5,387
Reaction score
6,952
Location
Spring hill, Kansas
Ram Year
2022 Power Wagon
Engine
6.4 Hemi, 8sp
There are some definite opinions on here about 3.92 gears. Having just purchased a 3.21 Hemi 8spd truck they would have you feel that the truck can't really do anything and is nothing more than an oversized suv. Now most of us may use our trucks for that doesn't mean they can't also be a truck.

I decided to compare the final drive ratios of both setups and found out some interesting info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.21
1 15.09
2 10.05
3 6.74
4 5.36
5 4.14
6 3.21
7 2.7
8 2.15

6-spd (65rfe) 3.92
1 11.76
2 6.55
3 5.88
4 3.92
5 2.94
6 2.63

Looks like the 8spd 3.21 still has the edge over the 6spd 3.92. I know everyone knew the 8 was better than the 6 all else being the same, but this shows how much different the 8spd is. Basically the 8 spd 2-7 is the 6 spd 1-6. You gain a whole lot better first and pretty decent 8th. And the 6 spd really is just a 5spd during linear upshifting. 3rd gear is an optional kickdown gear or it can be used when electronically shifting, but is probably useless being so close to 2nd.

So if you are upgrading from a 6 spd 3.92 truck you should feel comfortable going with the 3.21 gearing you will have better acceleration and fuel economy. If you just want the fastest possible acceleration or need to tow 10,000 lbs then feel free to go 3.92 with the 8spd or go find an r/t with a 4.10 (not sure if 8spd or 6spd).

I added the 3.92 just to have the info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.92
1 18.42
2 12.27
3 8.23
4 6.55
5 5.06
6 3.92
7 3.29
8 2.63


66rfe gears

1st 3.231
2nd 1.837
3rd 1.410
4th 1.000
5th 0.816
6th 0.625
Reverse 4.444


does that seem right, the 6sp gearing on the 2500s. it looks like the 8sp 6th gear is about the same as the 66 rfes 1st gear.

I guess the final gear ratio need to figured in.
 
Last edited:

crash68

ACME product engineer
Staff member
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Posts
10,781
Reaction score
16,918
Ram Year
2015
Engine
3.0 EcoDiesel
I don't know how you can disagree with the numbers when looking at the final output drive ratio comparison.

His numbers look close to me. The 6 speed was right on, but the 8 speed was .01 to .02 off from what I got. The place we found the trans ratios must be off just a bit or rounded different.

Here in lies the problem, a number format issue with Tapatalk, the spacing between the numbers.
b171ea0d75835e7e6848d49287272cb2.jpg
If they were typed with some sort of list format like 1:
 

charonblk07

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Posts
4,056
Reaction score
2,072
Location
Calgary, Ab
Ram Year
2009
Engine
F1-A forged 349ci
66rfe gears

1st 3.231
2nd 1.837
3rd 1.410
4th 1.000
5th 0.816
6th 0.625
Reverse 4.444


does that seem right, the 6sp gearing on the 2500s. it looks like the 8sp 6th gear is about the same as the 66 rfes 1st gear.

I guess the final gear ratio need to figured in.


Those are just the transmission gear ratios, you need to multiply them by whatever differential ratio (3.73,4.11, etc) you have to get the final drive ratio.
 

blrmkrl83

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Posts
270
Reaction score
107
Location
Iowa
Ram Year
2011
Engine
5.7
Here in lies the problem, a number format issue with Tapatalk, the spacing between the numbers.
b171ea0d75835e7e6848d49287272cb2.jpg
If they were typed with some sort of list format like 1:

It's not quite that bad on my computer. I read it right the first time, but when I was checking the numbers I read it as 115.09. I thought wtf, that would be like 6,000 rpm at 2mph. Then I looked again:doh2:
 

bubbagumpshrimp

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Posts
146
Reaction score
32
Ram Year
2016
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I agree about why stress about gears. And why do these types of threads have to turn into a who can **** the furthest contest?

I'm very happy with my 3.55 and when I do need to get into it the extra 1/8 of a second the 3.92 would have gotten me there is of no matter.

Yup. For the average person (only uses their truck to tow around a utility trailer or haul around 1,000 lbs or so)....the gearing issue isn't something to lose sleep over.
 
OP
OP
M

magic280z

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Posts
111
Reaction score
44
Ram Year
2019 1500 Laramie
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Sorry edited post to separate gear and ratio. These are final drive gear x diff* all produced side by side*using a gearing website. There are multiple ratios for the 8hp70. I couldn't find the exact ram ratios. These was the lowest ones I found.

When I purchased my truck the 3.55 was only available on the v6. Didn't see it for the hemi.
 

blrmkrl83

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2011
Posts
270
Reaction score
107
Location
Iowa
Ram Year
2011
Engine
5.7
Sorry edited post to separate gear and ratio. These are final drive gear x diff* all produced side by side*using a gearing website. There are multiple ratios for the 8hp70. I couldn't find the exact ram ratios. These was the lowest ones I found.

When I purchased my truck the 3.55 was only available on the v6. Didn't see it for the hemi.

That looks a lot better.:happy107: I knew the 8spd had a lower 1st, but never realized it was that much. My 5spd with 3.92 can do a decent job of spinning the tires. I bet the 8spd really roasts them. At least until the stupid computer makes it shift.
 

schul788

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Posts
107
Reaction score
36
Ram Year
2015
Engine
Hemi 5.7
There are some definite opinions on here about 3.92 gears. Having just purchased a 3.21 Hemi 8spd truck they would have you feel that the truck can't really do anything and is nothing more than an oversized suv. Now most of us may use our trucks for that doesn't mean they can't also be a truck.

I decided to compare the final drive ratios of both setups and found out some interesting info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.21
1- 15.09
2- 10.05
3- 6.74
4- 5.36
5- 4.14
6- 3.21
7- 2.7
8- 2.15

6-spd (65rfe) 3.92
1- 11.76
2- 6.55
3- 5.88
4- 3.92
5- 2.94
6- 2.63

Looks like the 8spd 3.21 still has the edge over the 6spd 3.92. I know everyone knew the 8 was better than the 6 all else being the same, but this shows how much different the 8spd is. Basically the 8 spd 2-7 is the 6 spd 1-6. You gain a whole lot better first and pretty decent 8th. And the 6 spd really is just a 5spd during linear upshifting. 3rd gear is an optional kickdown gear or it can be used when electronically shifting, but is probably useless being so close to 2nd.

So if you are upgrading from a 6 spd 3.92 truck you should feel comfortable going with the 3.21 gearing you will have better acceleration and fuel economy. If you just want the fastest possible acceleration or need to tow 10,000 lbs then feel free to go 3.92 with the 8spd or go find an r/t with a 4.10 (not sure if 8spd or 6spd).

I added the 3.92 just to have the info.

8-spd (8hp70) 3.92
1- 18.42
2- 12.27
3- 8.23
4- 6.55
5- 5.06
6- 3.92
7- 3.29
8- 2.63

Great info. This hopefully should help people with the 3.21/3.92 decision. I know I did a lot of research to figure out which one to get when I ordered my truck and got the 3.21. For most people who don't tow huge loads or love to go really fast really quick in their truck, it doesn't really matter.
 
Top