- Joined
- Nov 13, 2012
- Posts
- 4,625
- Reaction score
- 1,446
- Location
- Springfield, VA
- Ram Year
- 2020
- Engine
- 5.7L
K&N has an article showing just how dishonest the MAF sensor claim is and how it reflects poorly on the ethics, integrity and mechanical aptitude of anyone making the claim.Well you've decided to attack my post. So tell me what this claimed, and verified, damage has been from K&N filters... Why haven't millions of others had the same experience? I assume you speak from vast experience with K&Ns rather than just reading about them. My posts are based on actual experience. Never had a vehicle yet whose performance didn't improve with just a filter swap. Sometimes just a little, other times a lot. Nor have I ever had an engine problem from running them.
I'll agree with you that the butt-dyno can lie sometimes. However timeslips don't lie. Here's an anecdotal story for you. I took my RAM to the track a few weeks ago. Bone stock. Next week I went back with only one change, replaced the OEM element with a K&N drop in. Knocked a tenth off my time. Same track, same weather, same everything, except filter and fuel level. I had a full tank the second trip and 1/4 tank the first time. So possibly more than a tenth if the tank had the same each time. The only thing I "felt" after the swap was increased throttle response and acceleration. The timeslips just confirmed what I already knew.
But you want to see dyno data for a K&N swap. There's plenty of examples out there, but here's one so you don't have to Google it.
K&N Air Filter Test - Tech Articles - Hot Rod Network
As for years of experience. I know of a handful of shops that've been in business and making money for decades. I've seen their work and would never let them touch anything of mine. And yes, I used to wrench for money when I was younger. Not saying that applies to you, just saying length of service doesn't necessarily equate to quality of service. In any industry. But you seem dead set that your opinion is the final word, so lets just agree to disagree. The other members can research this topic for themselves and make their own decisions. I've made mine and couldn't be happier, or quicker.
wink
https://www.knfilters.com/news/news.aspx?id=422
Anyone who understands the ISO 5011 Testing Standard knows that it is not whether or not some Goober can see light through the un-oiled filter. It is whether a properly oiled filter stops about 96-98% of all dust right on down to .5 Microns (a human hair is 50 microns).
Some 'wrenches' are stuck in a time warp in the days of timing lights and feeler gauges to set spark gap and mechanical point timing. They're run'n "retard."