Oh man, looks like 2013 is bringing something for 1500's

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Ramunit

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Posts
816
Reaction score
193
Ram Year
2005
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Well the first sentence of the article says it's still several years out. Interesting anyway.
 

0212353

Vendor
Preferred Vendor
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
26,467
Reaction score
2,023
Location
Florissant, MO
Ram Year
2019 1500 Laramie Sport Crew, 2019 1500 Big Horn Sport Crew & 2016 Charger SRT Hellcat
Engine
2x 5.7L & 6.2L
The engine can be tuned to produce more than 400 pounds-feet of torque, and, in a truck platform, it is likely to be able to tow as much as 10,000 pounds.

Thats it?

I don't have a torque monster diesel or tuning, and I already have 400+ foot lb. 10K? Mines rated for that too......hmmm.
 

Stangshcky12

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Posts
9,047
Reaction score
941
Location
Oshkosh, WI
Ram Year
2007
Engine
5.9 Cummins
Thats it?

I don't have a torque monster diesel or tuning, and I already have 400+ foot lb. 10K? Mines rated for that too......hmmm.

They up the numbers much more then that they'll be hurting there own sales of 3/4 ton trucks
It's still a half ton and is targeted more for fuel efficiency rather the power and towing
I'll believe it when I see it!
 
OP
OP
WhiteRam

WhiteRam

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Posts
992
Reaction score
203
Location
Dallas, TX
Ram Year
2012 2500 CCLB
Engine
6.7 CTD
That would be super legit though.
 

TexasRammer

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Posts
4,093
Reaction score
335
Location
College Station, TX
Ram Year
2002
Engine
4.7
Thats it?

I don't have a torque monster diesel or tuning, and I already have 400+ foot lb. 10K? Mines rated for that too......hmmm.
eh who cares, if you were to have a choice between a diesel and a gas, and both had the same power, which would you choose?:********:
 

Sagebrush2500

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
1,457
Reaction score
168
Ram Year
2013 2500 Big Horn
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Glad this doesn't look like an immediate reality considering I just bought a 3/4 ton for the diesel!!!

There are good points here - if the diesel makes as much power as the gas, what's the point?
 

0212353

Vendor
Preferred Vendor
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
26,467
Reaction score
2,023
Location
Florissant, MO
Ram Year
2019 1500 Laramie Sport Crew, 2019 1500 Big Horn Sport Crew & 2016 Charger SRT Hellcat
Engine
2x 5.7L & 6.2L
eh who cares, if you were to have a choice between a diesel and a gas, and both had the same power, which would you choose?:********:

Gas. I have absolutely no need for a diesel, or a truck for that matter. Its my toy, and my drive to work is 3 miles. LOL I'd kill a diesel.
 

Sagebrush2500

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
1,457
Reaction score
168
Ram Year
2013 2500 Big Horn
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Gas. I have absolutely no need for a diesel, or a truck for that matter. Its my toy, and my drive to work is 3 miles. LOL I'd kill a diesel.

LOL - think I'd take a bike for that distance!
 

Stangshcky12

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Posts
9,047
Reaction score
941
Location
Oshkosh, WI
Ram Year
2007
Engine
5.9 Cummins
There are good points here - if the diesel makes as much power as the gas, what's the point?

For the same reason they put them in jettas and countless other small/compact cars in Europe, efficiency!
My buddy was getting upwards of 50 mpg in his TDI on the highway
If you could get 25-26 mpg out of a half ton you would sweep the market, even if it could only tow as much as a gas job
 

Sagebrush2500

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Posts
1,457
Reaction score
168
Ram Year
2013 2500 Big Horn
Engine
5.7 Hemi
For the same reason they put them in jettas and countless other small/compact cars in Europe, efficiency!
My buddy was getting upwards of 50 mpg in his TDI on the highway
If you could get 25-26 mpg out of a half ton you would sweep the market, even if it could only tow as much as a gas job

I see what you're saying. My understanding was that the emissions laws did away with the possibility of pushing significantly higher MPG (that would create a "no-brainer" off-set to the difference in fuel costs) out of a diesel.
 

Stangshcky12

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Posts
9,047
Reaction score
941
Location
Oshkosh, WI
Ram Year
2007
Engine
5.9 Cummins
It's really hard to say actually
If you go to websites like fuelly you can see what guys are actually averaging mpg wise, 04-06 5.9 averaged about 15.4 mpg, 07-09 6.7 are averaging 16 mpg,2010-2012 6.7 are only averaging about 14.5

I would blame that more on the change in body styles and the increase in power more then the emissions
These new 6.7 (2010-present) are pushing 350 hp and 800 lb-ft compared to the 07-09 6.7s 350hp and 650 lb-ft and 04-06 5.9s 325 hp and 610 lb-ft
I'm certainly not saying that the emissions control doesn't hurt the efficiency, but I hardly ever see people throw these other factors in

Diesels big advantage is the energy density and there torque output. If you don't tune them for the absolute most power you can get out of them, you can get an almost flat torque curve, great start up torque but yet very efficient at highway speeds (i.e hybrid cars)
 

Cthulhu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Posts
833
Reaction score
99
Location
Calgary, AB
Ram Year
2006
Engine
Cummins 5.9
Diesel in Ram is a known winner because of the Cummins experience. We've seen failure after failure with other brand of diesel engines, Detroit, Ford, Ford, Ford... oh, and Ford... Fiat doesn't have any fans with a following to draw them in.

This will be a hard sell.
 

Stangshcky12

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Posts
9,047
Reaction score
941
Location
Oshkosh, WI
Ram Year
2007
Engine
5.9 Cummins
Diesel in Ram is a known winner because of the Cummins experience. We've seen failure after failure with other brand of diesel engines, Detroit, International, International, International... oh, and international... Fiat doesn't have any fans with a following to draw them in.

This will be a hard sell.

That needed fixed
The ford built 6.7 "powerstroke" is actually a very well built motor in my experience
On the other hand I absolutely hate anything international anymore...
 

USMC1188

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Posts
1,905
Reaction score
271
Location
SW Ohio
Ram Year
None
Engine
Truckless...
I would consider the diesel option if I had the choice in a 1500. Again, it would be because of the fuel economy. It would always depend on pricing as well, if it were much more than the gas engine, it may not be worth it at all.

As for the Fords, I can't argue with you at all Cody. I would consider the new 6.7 strokers if I were looking for a new truck. I am not a Ford fan, but those engines mean business. That and the ol 7.3s. Those are some good ol engines.
 

garner

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Posts
3,979
Reaction score
85
Location
Harker Heights, TX
Ram Year
2012
Engine
Hemi 5.7
It's really hard to say actually
If you go to websites like fuelly you can see what guys are actually averaging mpg wise, 04-06 5.9 averaged about 15.4 mpg, 07-09 6.7 are averaging 16 mpg,2010-2012 6.7 are only averaging about 14.5

I would blame that more on the change in body styles and the increase in power more then the emissions
These new 6.7 (2010-present) are pushing 350 hp and 800 lb-ft compared to the 07-09 6.7s 350hp and 650 lb-ft and 04-06 5.9s 325 hp and 610 lb-ft
I'm certainly not saying that the emissions control doesn't hurt the efficiency, but I hardly ever see people throw these other factors in

Diesels big advantage is the energy density and there torque output. If you don't tune them for the absolute most power you can get out of them, you can get an almost flat torque curve, great start up torque but yet very efficient at highway speeds (i.e hybrid cars)

Only the late 2011 auto and 2012 auto have the 800 lb-ft torque. 2010-mid 2011 auto and all manuals only have 650 lb-ft torque
 
Top