WhiteRam
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Posts
- 992
- Reaction score
- 203
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Ram Year
- 2012 2500 CCLB
- Engine
- 6.7 CTD
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
The engine can be tuned to produce more than 400 pounds-feet of torque, and, in a truck platform, it is likely to be able to tow as much as 10,000 pounds.
Thats it?
I don't have a torque monster diesel or tuning, and I already have 400+ foot lb. 10K? Mines rated for that too......hmmm.
eh who cares, if you were to have a choice between a diesel and a gas, and both had the same power, which would you choose?:********:Thats it?
I don't have a torque monster diesel or tuning, and I already have 400+ foot lb. 10K? Mines rated for that too......hmmm.
eh who cares, if you were to have a choice between a diesel and a gas, and both had the same power, which would you choose?:********:
Gas. I have absolutely no need for a diesel, or a truck for that matter. Its my toy, and my drive to work is 3 miles. LOL I'd kill a diesel.
There are good points here - if the diesel makes as much power as the gas, what's the point?
For the same reason they put them in jettas and countless other small/compact cars in Europe, efficiency!
My buddy was getting upwards of 50 mpg in his TDI on the highway
If you could get 25-26 mpg out of a half ton you would sweep the market, even if it could only tow as much as a gas job
Diesel in Ram is a known winner because of the Cummins experience. We've seen failure after failure with other brand of diesel engines, Detroit, International, International, International... oh, and international... Fiat doesn't have any fans with a following to draw them in.
This will be a hard sell.
It's really hard to say actually
If you go to websites like fuelly you can see what guys are actually averaging mpg wise, 04-06 5.9 averaged about 15.4 mpg, 07-09 6.7 are averaging 16 mpg,2010-2012 6.7 are only averaging about 14.5
I would blame that more on the change in body styles and the increase in power more then the emissions
These new 6.7 (2010-present) are pushing 350 hp and 800 lb-ft compared to the 07-09 6.7s 350hp and 650 lb-ft and 04-06 5.9s 325 hp and 610 lb-ft
I'm certainly not saying that the emissions control doesn't hurt the efficiency, but I hardly ever see people throw these other factors in
Diesels big advantage is the energy density and there torque output. If you don't tune them for the absolute most power you can get out of them, you can get an almost flat torque curve, great start up torque but yet very efficient at highway speeds (i.e hybrid cars)