dropkicknick
Member
this thread was created because OES now recommends NGK LASER IRIDUIM LZFR5CI-11 over the standard copper NGK Standard LZFR5C-11
i keep reading about iridium plugs being trash for the early 4th gens so i decided to do some research
NGK is Mopar Original equipment supplier (OES) which means your Mopar plugs are NGKs with a Mopar stamp on it
most of the complaints ive seen were from offbrand OES iridium plugs like Bosch or Autolite etc
-side note, if you pay $2.99 for an iridium plug i.e. Autolite, that right there is your issue-
i even read quite a few that used NGK iridium plugs but they were using the NGK IX series, but i havent seen anything on the LASER series
so i went to NGK website and compared the OEM vs Iridium Laser vs Iridium IX.
(i use the iridium IX in this comparison because so many of the complaints were from them)
OEM NGK Standard LZFR5C-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Nickel
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: standard
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
NGK LASER IRIDUIM LZFR5CI-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Iridium
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: standard
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
NGK Iridium IX LFR5AIX-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Iridium
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: Taper cut
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
series descriptions state that the IX is for performance applications while the LASER is for OE applications
the differences between the 2 that i could find is:
-IX has taper cut ground electrode tip while the laser has standard
-while they both have a copper core ground electrode, the Laser has a platinum pad laser welded into it
-IX has some fancy "Trivalent metal coating" for anti corrosion/seizing
im sure theres more in depth technical differences but i couldnt find them
obviously there is enough difference between the 2 to label one performance and one approved for OE use but since NGK is recommending the laser as a OE replacement for the standard copper right on there website and on rockauto i had to dig.
so! can anyone confirm that the NGK LASER IRIDUIM LZFR5CI-11 has caused them issues? are you sure you were using the same part number as mentioned above?
i think i speak for alot of people when i say id like that extra 70,000 miles but i wont sacrifice engine life if they cause performance issues.
i keep reading about iridium plugs being trash for the early 4th gens so i decided to do some research
NGK is Mopar Original equipment supplier (OES) which means your Mopar plugs are NGKs with a Mopar stamp on it
most of the complaints ive seen were from offbrand OES iridium plugs like Bosch or Autolite etc
-side note, if you pay $2.99 for an iridium plug i.e. Autolite, that right there is your issue-
i even read quite a few that used NGK iridium plugs but they were using the NGK IX series, but i havent seen anything on the LASER series
so i went to NGK website and compared the OEM vs Iridium Laser vs Iridium IX.
(i use the iridium IX in this comparison because so many of the complaints were from them)
OEM NGK Standard LZFR5C-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Nickel
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: standard
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
NGK LASER IRIDUIM LZFR5CI-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Iridium
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: standard
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
NGK Iridium IX LFR5AIX-11
center electrode core material: copper
center electrode tip material: Iridium
ground configuration: standard
ground electrode core material: Nickel
ground electrode quantity: 1
ground electrode tip design: Taper cut
hex size: 5/8
insulator height: 50.5mm
heat range: 5
pre-gap size: .044
reach: 26.5
resistance: 5000 Ohms
series descriptions state that the IX is for performance applications while the LASER is for OE applications
the differences between the 2 that i could find is:
-IX has taper cut ground electrode tip while the laser has standard
-while they both have a copper core ground electrode, the Laser has a platinum pad laser welded into it
-IX has some fancy "Trivalent metal coating" for anti corrosion/seizing
im sure theres more in depth technical differences but i couldnt find them
obviously there is enough difference between the 2 to label one performance and one approved for OE use but since NGK is recommending the laser as a OE replacement for the standard copper right on there website and on rockauto i had to dig.
so! can anyone confirm that the NGK LASER IRIDUIM LZFR5CI-11 has caused them issues? are you sure you were using the same part number as mentioned above?
i think i speak for alot of people when i say id like that extra 70,000 miles but i wont sacrifice engine life if they cause performance issues.