Please do some additional research on this v6 pentastar. I recall seeing lots of threads with issues for this engine. I'd stick with tacoma or tundra
Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately the latest Tacoma is a near disaster of unrefinement; e.g. it's V6 engine drives as though it has permanently ******** ignition timing, hence requires nearly full throttle to have any get up and go and about 1/3 throttle to maintain freeway speeds. The latest Tacoma also has small, hard seat bottoms and a hard ride even in the base 2WD configuration. The Tundra has an OK drivetrain, but its stiff ride motions are also tiring on long trips. By contrast, this is what Consumer Reports has to say about the RAM 1500:
“This is the most comfortable-riding full-sized pickup on the market, yet the Ram is also plenty capable of grunt work. Its coil-spring rear suspension helps cushion the ride, and the spacious cab is luxury-car quiet. Our Big Horn Crew Cab, with its smooth 5.7-liter V8, averaged 15 mpg. The base 3.6-liter V6 is no weakling, but it tows less. The torquey 3.0-liter diesel V6 version is expensive but delivers effortless thrust and returns a class-leading 20 mpg overall. Rear-seat room is generous, and the Uconnect 8.4-inch touch-screen infotainment system is easy to use. The top trim Limited is lavishly furnished inside and benefits from air suspension that lends the Ram a comfortable ride.”
In 2016 Consumer Reports said the RAM had terrible reliability, but then in October 2017 they wrote:
"Newly Recommended Models With Improved Reliability
Audi A3, Chrysler Pacifica, Ford F-150, Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Ram 1500, Volkswagen Golf Alltrack, Volkswagen Passat."
So even though I'd probably have to put up with potentially more long term mechanical trouble with a RAM as compared to a Tundra or Tacoma, those years and miles would be near luxury car pleasant and comfortable.