37's and 3.21. Here I go again...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Maligator

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Jun 30, 2017
Posts
1,162
Reaction score
1,632
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hem 5.7
I didn't realize that the OP had a V6, that would probably sway my decision. That's almost a 140 hp difference.

I know that a 37 tire isn't the best option mechanically for the 3.21s but I guess my only argument would be is that everyone usually sticks to "go with 35s" but in reality most 35s are E rated and heavier than some D rated 37s. For example a 35x12.5r18 Nitto and Toyo Mt is 81lbs where my BFG 37s I had were only 74lbs and they ran small. I guess what I'm trying to say is 1.5" in diameter more detrimental than the additional weight of an E rated 35? I'm just a knuckle dragger and not that smart...lol

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

HDHNTER

US AIR FORCE VETERAN OEF - OIF
Military
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Posts
352
Reaction score
349
Location
SC
Ram Year
2017
Engine
5.7L HEMI
I guess what I'm trying to say is 1.5" in diameter more detrimental than the additional weight of an E rated 35?

Weight is far more detrimental than diameter.
 

chrisp2493

Always Modding
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Posts
3,006
Reaction score
1,870
Location
Warren, OH
Ram Year
2003
Engine
392 Hemi
Putting 37"s on any truck running anything less than 4.xx gears isn't wisest decision. Do you want the look more than practicality and reliability? I ran 33s, on my '12 JK (3.21s) and even with the manual trans it was a dog. A full size pickup, with the same motor; more weight, more frustration.

4447d1264289351-gear-ratios-gear_ratios.jpg

Is that graph supposed to show rpms with all the numbers? Because that’s not really accurate...at all. I would assume that’s rpms at a 1:1 transmission gear ratio at say 60 mph, that’s a guess. Can’t forget almost every vehichle has an overdrive (2 in fact, for most ram transmissions) and lockup which drops another few hundred rpms. My truck with 4.56 gears and a .67 final gear ratio sits at 2000 rpms at 60 mph.


Another thing to remember is the 8 speed transmission has a 4.5 or something first gear ratio. Your truck from way back in the day probably had a 4 speed with like a 2.5 first gear ratio. That makes a HUGE difference, when the new truck gets to 3rd gear to be equivalent to an older transmission 1st gear. The 8 speed has the best of both worlds, great acceleration due to transmission low gears, and low rpms at cruise because you’re using a longer rear end gear at cruising.


I Bleed Ram Trucks
 

skyline090

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Posts
41
Reaction score
25
Location
charlotte, nc
Ram Year
2015
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Is that graph supposed to show rpms with all the numbers? Because that’s not really accurate...at all. I would assume that’s rpms at a 1:1 transmission gear ratio at say 60 mph, that’s a guess. Can’t forget almost every vehichle has an overdrive (2 in fact, for most ram transmissions) and lockup which drops another few hundred rpms. My truck with 4.56 gears and a .67 final gear ratio sits at 2000 rpms at 60 mph.


Another thing to remember is the 8 speed transmission has a 4.5 or something first gear ratio. Your truck from way back in the day probably had a 4 speed with like a 2.5 first gear ratio. That makes a HUGE difference, when the new truck gets to 3rd gear to be equivalent to an older transmission 1st gear. The 8 speed has the best of both worlds, great acceleration due to transmission low gears, and low rpms at cruise because you’re using a longer rear end gear at cruising.


I Bleed Ram Trucks
I found that graph here on the forum so it may be for old 6spd autos. Nuisances in data aside, there is far more consistency in empirical data support running 37s on 3.21 gears is anything but optimal.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

chrisp2493

Always Modding
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Posts
3,006
Reaction score
1,870
Location
Warren, OH
Ram Year
2003
Engine
392 Hemi
I found that graph here on the forum so it may be for old 6spd autos. Nuisances in data aside, there is far more consistency in empirical data support running 37s on 3.21 gears is anything but optimal.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Here is a similar chart. It’s not accurate at all. It’s listing a 1:1 ratio at 65 mph, with a manual transmissions. So the rpms are off by about 1000rpms. That chart shows 4.56’s with a 33” tires as 3018 rpms. My truck is at about 2150roms at that same speed. So not even close.

https://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto...wing/maneuvers/gear-ratio-tire-size-chart.htm

Old truck (545rfe) with 4.56 gears

First gear ratio 3.00:1 = 13.68 first gear ratio



New truck with 8 speed, 3.21 rear end

First gear 4.71 = 15.1 final ratio.

So you can see how much the newer transmissions change the effect ratio and why they accelerate better with a longer rear gear. Bump that up to a 3.92 stock gear and that will solve any problem a 37” tire has



I Bleed Ram Trucks
 

turnerje

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Posts
26
Reaction score
16
Location
Clovis, NM
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
You better change your gearing. I had a 13 with 3.21 and the 8 speed, all stock. I cannot imagine putting 37s on it that way. If you tow with it, you’ll even have more issues. Heck, if I decide to put 37s on my power wagon with 4.10s; I’d probably have to re-gear too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

skyline090

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Posts
41
Reaction score
25
Location
charlotte, nc
Ram Year
2015
Engine
5.7 Hemi
You better change your gearing. I had a 13 with 3.21 and the 8 speed, all stock. I cannot imagine putting 37s on it that way. If you tow with it, you’ll even have more issues. Heck, if I decide to put 37s on my power wagon with 4.10s; I’d probably have to re-gear too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These two guys are in it for the looks. They aren't towing..just showing. I give them 6mo before they want to re-gear.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

GIJoe2010

No sh*t, there I was . . .
Military
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Posts
1,920
Reaction score
1,495
Location
Killeen, TX
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Interesting how the OP hasn’t said a word since he started the thread ...
 

ThunderMug95

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Posts
2,197
Reaction score
3,199
Location
North Prince George, VA
Ram Year
2017
Engine
5.7
It was a noticeable difference between my oem 265/70/17 (31.4”)and my current 305/55/20(33.2”) on my acceleration. I have 3.21’s. The weight difference in the tires is the culprit. That being said adding a PC, intake and exhaust negated much of that loss...but I have the 5.7. Its still pretty quick and powerful.
In response to the posts about “built to tow 4-10k lbs” I just think how hard that makes the powertrain work. Its not like you can unhitch the 37’s...Even with the 8spd on stock tires that V6 is working its ass off to move a big heavy mass. To get 300hp out of a NA 6 cyl is awesome, but it is asking a lot out of smaller motor. To lessen the load, regearing it seems to be the smart option for the longevity of the truck. Just my 2cents...
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Posts
0
Reaction score
64
Location
Riverside California
Ram Year
2018 2wd
Engine
HEMI 5.7 Revolution 4.88s
These two guys are in it for the looks. They aren't towing..just showing. I give them 6mo before they want to re-gear.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Yes correct, I am not looking to spin my wheels, or drive like a speed demon on the highway, or to tow anything.

I got the truck because I like first of all how it looks period, adding a lift, wheels and tires only adds to the looks of my truck. If I wanted to tow I would of gone with a 2500 or 3500, or a Cummins, If I wanted to fly down the highway I would of gotten an SRT10 or other type of sports truck.

To me the Big Horn has the best of both worlds, you can tow if you "need" to, haul ass if you "need" to and play in the dirt if you "need" to as well.

Not everyone is looking for optimal performance and those that understand that by adding certain aftermarket parts can decrease their truck's performance do it knowing so.

I can sacrifice a bit of performance just to get the look I want on my truck, if later down the road I need to regear then so be it, but having 37s with a 7" lift is something I really want and I think I should be able to, I mean it is my money right?

I understand the risks, that is why you ask questions and it is up to Me or those who ask for advice if they will take it or not. Asking these questions is us educating ourselves about the things we might do or will do to our trucks.

So with that said, I thank you all for all the feedback, advice, recommendations every bit of knowledge that you guys have posted not only on this thread but all over these forums.

It was a noticeable difference between my oem 265/70/17 (31.4”)and my current 305/55/20(33.2”) on my acceleration. I have 3.21’s. The weight difference in the tires is the culprit. That being said adding a PC, intake and exhaust negated much of that loss...but I have the 5.7. Its still pretty quick and powerful.
In response to the posts about “built to tow 4-10k lbs” I just think how hard that makes the powertrain work. Its not like you can unhitch the 37’s...Even with the 8spd on stock tires that V6 is working its ass off to move a big heavy mass. To get 300hp out of a NA 6 cyl is awesome, but it is asking a lot out of smaller motor. To lessen the load, regearing it seems to be the smart option for the longevity of the truck. Just my 2cents...

I "will" eventually regear, but right now the money I am spending is for the lift, wheels and tires. I doubt that waiting a few months is going to destroy my truck ... my average speed in the city is 55, on the highway 70 lol ... I want to enjoy my driving and maybe just maybe once in a while I let the pedal hit the floor just for the hell of it ...
 

boblonben

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2016
Posts
587
Reaction score
297
Location
Texas
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Hey everyone. I've finally decided I want to do a six inch lift with 37's on my 2015 Ram 1500. I see posts that say it is an absolute dog and those few rare posts that say 3.21 with 37's don't seem to be an issue whatsoever. I feel like I am way too stuck on 37's and how nice they look. But I want to make sure I'm not going to tear things apart in a month. I have the 8 speed tranny (of course) which I've heard helps a little bit of the 6 speeds. I don't live in a hilly area but I do end up driving up and down some hills every once in a while. I would say my driving is 75% city and 25% highway. But when I say city I mean country roads that are 55 MPH and are usually a few mile strips. I get everyone says not to but the people who say not to never had any experience with the setup. I guess that's why i'm still stuck on 37's. I also don't get why it isn't just like a load from a trailer. I get there is more revolutions but I feel like it can't be that big of an issue... Any input is appreciated.
have not seen a single 27 set up that looked decent. Don't know what it is about those or you who go for these, don't make sense !!!
 

Ohio5pt7

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Posts
2,207
Reaction score
1,784
Location
Ohio
Ram Year
2018
Engine
5.7 hemi
have not seen a single 27 set up that looked decent. Don't know what it is about those or you who go for these, don't make sense !!!
I'm a mall crawler type of person 26" with 37s look good lol.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
 

Tracy in IL

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Posts
287
Reaction score
171
Location
Moline IL
Ram Year
2017
Engine
3.0 diesel
if you don't change the gear ratio to near 4.0 the tranny will overheat and you'll fry the torque converter, possibly even causing a tranny oil leak, spray on the exhaust, and it'll catch fire. Been there done that.
 

Bobbyc05

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Posts
22
Reaction score
57
Ram Year
2014
Engine
5.7 Hemi
20170629_143949.jpg
Hey everyone. I've finally decided I want to do a six inch lift with 37's on my 2015 Ram 1500. I see posts that say it is an absolute dog and those few rare posts that say 3.21 with 37's don't seem to be an issue whatsoever. I feel like I am way too stuck on 37's and how nice they look. But I want to make sure I'm not going to tear things apart in a month. I have the 8 speed tranny (of course) which I've heard helps a little bit of the 6 speeds. I don't live in a hilly area but I do end up driving up and down some hills every once in a while. I would say my driving is 75% city and 25% highway. But when I say city I mean country roads that are 55 MPH and are usually a few mile strips. I get everyone says not to but the people who say not to never had any experience with the setup. I guess that's why i'm still stuck on 37's. I also don't get why it isn't just like a load from a trailer. I get there is more revolutions but I feel like it can't be that big of an issue... Any input is appreciated.


I have 3.21's on my truck and running 38 inch nitto ridge grapplers. I have the 6 inch suspension with 3 inch body lift. But also did the super chip upgrade with flowmaster exhaust and cold air intake. Even with 38's it jumps on acceleration. Never had issue and it's been 2 years so far. I had 37's on my truck with the 6 inch lift as far as look, I think you would be disappointed. That's why I did the 3 inch body lift and upgraded to 38s. But if you are going on looks alone go with the 6 inch lift and 35s. Get yourself some performance upgrades with it.

Here is mine with 37's. These are the nitto grappler G2's. From the pic it doesn't look like it has a 6 inch lift. It's a lot of tire and takes a way the rake you would want.

20170629_143949.jpg
 
OP
OP
W
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Posts
40
Reaction score
38
Location
Ohio
Ram Year
2015
Engine
Pentastar 3.6L V6
That is also what I keep asking people, if these trucks are meant and "CAN" tow/haul anywhere from 4,000 to 10,000 lbs ... someone please explain to me the difference from 37, 38 or 40" wheels and towing 4,000 to 10,000 lbs ... funny that Wyatt mentioned that because we were talking about this very topic at work during lunch ... just makes no sense ...


Exactly. It just doesn't make any sense
 
OP
OP
W
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Posts
40
Reaction score
38
Location
Ohio
Ram Year
2015
Engine
Pentastar 3.6L V6
I didn't realize that the OP had a V6, that would probably sway my decision. That's almost a 140 hp difference.

I know that a 37 tire isn't the best option mechanically for the 3.21s but I guess my only argument would be is that everyone usually sticks to "go with 35s" but in reality most 35s are E rated and heavier than some D rated 37s. For example a 35x12.5r18 Nitto and Toyo Mt is 81lbs where my BFG 37s I had were only 74lbs and they ran small. I guess what I'm trying to say is 1.5" in diameter more detrimental than the additional weight of an E rated 35? I'm just a knuckle dragger and not that smart...lol

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk


Not sure where you got a 140 horsepower difference. My year on my truck makes 305HP. Current date Hemi's make 395. Not to say that all of it is even go to the wheel in either engines but its not a 140 difference.
 

Maligator

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Jun 30, 2017
Posts
1,162
Reaction score
1,632
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hem 5.7
Sorry I must've been looking at torque numbers3baec792772f76fc75009b6358dcf93e.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

Jwithing

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2017
Posts
2,330
Reaction score
1,593
Location
STL
Ram Year
2015
Engine
5.7
Long ass thread that I skimmed through, looks like some good convo.

For some perspective, I'm running 37x13.5 on my 15' w/ 8 spd and 3.92. I can break the tires loose no problem, often by accident, but I also have full bolt ons without tearing into the engine and a custom tune. :)
 

GIJoe2010

No sh*t, there I was . . .
Military
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Posts
1,920
Reaction score
1,495
Location
Killeen, TX
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I'm sure the 3.92s have a lot to do with breaking them loose.
 
Top