IS IT TIME 5.7 TO GET DROPPED ???

do you think CHRYSLER need to drop the 5.7 hemi

  • 5.7 hemi is ok in ram1500

    Votes: 85 73.3%
  • TIME FOR CHANGE !!!! need more power to keep up with competition

    Votes: 32 27.6%

  • Total voters
    116

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Poncherello

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
18
Reaction score
9
Ram Year
2016
Engine
5.7
I've had 3 5.7L Hemis and all were great, but if I could have checked a box and gotten an optional 6.4L
( or even an N.A. 6.2L they use for the TRX) I would have been all over that.
The 5.7L is getting outdated.
I wouldn't be opposed to them bringing back a modern version of the venerable 318ci 5.2L Magnum in an aluminum block, VVT, high compression motor to compete with Ford's 5.0 Coyote...
 

Poncherello

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
18
Reaction score
9
Ram Year
2016
Engine
5.7
I love the 5.7 in my ‘16 as well as the ZF Trans. First a 6.2 or 6.4 options for the 1500 would be great options. I think just updating the current 5.7 with better lifters, better oiling, forged internals, updated injection, updating the block more spacing between the bores, and making quality aluminum instead of cast iron. With that available boost.
 

Sammy

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Posts
25
Reaction score
11
Location
Canada
Ram Year
2019
Engine
5.7
No way. The Hemi is far from obsolete.

It is still barely outdone by only the Ecoboost in terms of power. Hemi 395hp vs Ecoboost 430hp. The Ram 1500 is still sitting right in the middle of the pack in terms of max towing at 12,750lbs. The Chevy needs a 6.2L to beat it with 13,300lbs max rated towing.
The Tundra and Titan are down to 9,000lbs and 10,000lbs max towing.

For fuel economy Ram, Ford and Chevy are nearly identical. Forget about the Tundra and Titan, they don't even come close.

Long live the Hemi!

Give us the 392 in a 1500 now damn it!
Sorry but the fuel economy is now where close to a ford. And the new 3.5 is 450hp and 500ft of torque.
Well ahead of the 5.7 hemi.
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
2,815
Reaction score
5,162
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Sorry but the fuel economy is now where close to a ford. And the new 3.5 is 450hp and 500ft of torque.
Well ahead of the 5.7 hemi.

And the new toyota hybrid is what, 570 lb/ft of torque?

I do like the hemi (lifter tick notwithstanding) but it's clearly the underdog now in performance if you care about winning stoplight races.

If you buy a truck because it's a good truck, and then want an engine to power it (like me), the hemi is perfectly fine. 22+mpg highway, pulls my trailer well, sounds great, and easily capable of getting out of its own way.

The ford does far worse in towing MPG though. That's been proven multiple times by guys on youtube like tfl truck and pickup truck talk. Unloaded, it's certainly possible to beat the hemi in mpg, but not when towing and working it hard.
 

AJNY

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2021
Posts
132
Reaction score
103
Location
Middletown, NY
Ram Year
2021
Engine
5.7
The 5.7 Hemi with the lifter problems cannot be fixed. 2021 the engine was modified to address the lifter issues and failed. Been a MOPAR fan since the 70’s. Never had a lifter issues on any MOPAR engine. This is my third 5.7. 2009 was great. 2018 and 2021 lifter issues. 2021 started at 900 MILES.
MOPAR DEALER kept the car a week. The dealer reported LIFTER NOISE NORMAL. ********!!
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
6,878
Reaction score
17,378
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
The 5.7 Hemi with the lifter problems cannot be fixed. 2021 the engine was modified to address the lifter issues and failed. Been a MOPAR fan since the 70’s. Never had a lifter issues on any MOPAR engine. This is my third 5.7. 2009 was great. 2018 and 2021 lifter issues. 2021 started at 900 MILES.
MOPAR DEALER kept the car a week. The dealer reported LIFTER NOISE NORMAL. ********!!

What information do you have about 2021 Hemi mod to address lifters? I am only aware of the change in lifter vendors and some of the design parameters in 2017.
 

MrTaz

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2021
Engine
5.7 Hemi E-Torque
What do you all think ? here is my take on this, I have owned bunch of those hemis over the years and I think the hemi is a good engine but I think Chrysler need to drop it from production the engine is getting old is not that efficient and begin to be underpowered , I would love to see a 4.0 L straight 6 turbo or smaller displacement dual over head cam v8 turbo in our trucks, I dont think this this will happened but I would love to see it in a near future , I think its time, CHRYSLER ARE YOU LISTENING ?
The straight 6 can't pass the emissions requirements which is the reason the Big Three done away with them.
 

Southern Ram

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Posts
763
Reaction score
176
Location
Laplace,LA
Ram Year
2019
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Since this is my first ever ram truck I can’t say anything about the engine. So far it has great power and pickup and doing well.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
6,878
Reaction score
17,378
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
The straight 6 can't pass the emissions requirements which is the reason the Big Three done away with them.

Why wouldn't a straight six pass emissions?
 

PJ Snyder

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Posts
147
Reaction score
97
Location
Grand Blanc MI
Ram Year
2004
Engine
5.7
I've had 3 5.7L Hemis and all were great, but if I could have checked a box and gotten an optional 6.4L
( or even an N.A. 6.2L they use for the TRX) I would have been all over that.
The 5.7L is getting outdated.
I wouldn't be opposed to them bringing back a modern version of the venerable 318ci 5.2L Magnum in an aluminum block, VVT, high compression motor to compete with Ford's 5.0 Coyote...
I agree with making a new 318. That was one of Chrysler's best engines, it was durable.
 

crash68

ACME product engineer
Staff member
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Posts
10,774
Reaction score
16,899
Ram Year
2015
Engine
3.0 EcoDiesel
Why wouldn't a straight six pass emissions?
It's not the I-6 format but the displacement of the cylinders themselves. The larger displacement cylinders have a uphill battle of complete combustion which causes excess emissions.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
2,202
Reaction score
3,632
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
After 2023 Ram will be producing a straight 6 turbo engine to replace the Hemi and will not make V8s anymore. At least according to an article I read. Things change though

Nope.
FCA did work on a 6 cylinder forced induction replacement with the project name of "Tornado". Rumor mill was it would be roughly 3 liters and over 500hp. But for whatever reason it was cancelled. I suspect to focus on hybrid powertrains/EVs but that's just a guess.
 

MrTaz

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2021
Engine
5.7 Hemi E-Torque
BMW doesn't seem to have any issues getting a straight 6 to pass...

BMW's engine is a dual overhead cam 24 valve engine that's a cross flow head design with variable valve timing on both the intake and exhaust. It's very modern in design and nothing like the dinosaur design of the inline 6's that the big three designed and built in the 60's and 70's
BMW's engine is a dual overhead cam 24 valve engine that's a cross flow head design with variable valve timing on both the intake and exhaust. It's very modern in design and nothing like the dinosaur design of the inline 6's that the big three designed and built in the 60's and 70's
 

MrTaz

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Posts
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2021
Engine
5.7 Hemi E-Torque
Why wouldn't a straight six pass emissions?
It can’t be cleaned up to current emission standards without an unacceptable loss of fuel economy.

The new generation “ECO” engines, with multiple camshafts, hemispherical head designs, port timed fuel injection, symmetrical intake runners, and variable valve timing are just too far beyond the old design engines in:
  • Low emissions
  • High power to weight ratios
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High compression ratios
  • Wide RPM bands with flatter torque curves
  • Low vertical height for fitting into low designs.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
2,202
Reaction score
3,632
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
BMW's engine is a dual overhead cam 24 valve engine that's a cross flow head design with variable valve timing on both the intake and exhaust. It's very modern in design and nothing like the dinosaur design of the inline 6's that the big three designed and built in the 60's and 70's

Who's talking about 60s/70s tech with motors being designed today, regardless of configuration? What 60s/70s motor of any configuration would pass today's emissions requirements? Why are you drawing some distinction with straight 6s?
 

2012RAM1500RT

Senior Member
TOTM Winner
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Posts
2,224
Reaction score
4,148
Location
nowhere
Really? For trucks, the inline 6 cylinder provides the strongest block architecture, which is why all the semi's run 'em. Individual cylinder bearings, inherently balanced (as is the V8, of course). The limiting factor was how much material you could get in the power cylinder to keep 'em together.

I'd try a turbo inline 6. Wife's I4 turbo is a low rpm torque beast. I really like it, compared to the wheezy V6 NA we had prior.
Yes, not interested in a 4 or 6 anything.
 

pacofortacos

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2017
Posts
3,565
Reaction score
4,343
Ram Year
2016
Engine
5.7
Why would you spend $billion + on a new design that you would not be unable to sell in most of the world in 4-8 yrs?

Now as a stop gap, They could, and SHOULD have from day 1, offer the truck 6.4 in the 1500. A little tweaking of the tune/ E torque should be able to meet the same emission/mpg as the 5.7 does in light driving but offer superior performance in towing mode.
I can't imagine driving around at 1400 rpms @ 70 mph should use much fuel and unlike the 5.7 it could hold 8th gear on slight grades.
People like the 6.4 in the 2500, I would think it would be a great option in the lighter 1500.
 

Farmer Fran

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Posts
1,508
Reaction score
1,294
Location
Earth
Ram Year
2020 Limited Loaded - Sold
I am pretty sure the 392 does not fit in the 1500 for some reason; and that it is not cost effective due to the push of EV. But even years ago, not cost effective because, well, the few that would pay for it. YES, I AM ONE THAT WOULD HAVE!

That said, what does the 5.7 not have that you really need in a 1500 vs the 392 other than bragging rights? None. The 5.7 is efficient, powerful and capable for what it is vs the payload.

I mean look at the rest of the line up going from the base engine to the 6.4 is $$$$ - personally I would have bought my Limited with the 6.4 over the 5.7 everyday and 2x on Sunday, but the average person would not - I mean look at the 3.21 vs 3.92 threads, it is all about MPG -UNTIL IT IS NOT!
 
Top