aj_g
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2022
- Posts
- 21
- Reaction score
- 8
- Location
- California
- Ram Year
- 2022
- Engine
- 3rd Gen Ecodiesel
Wow 32.6-34.2 wtf lol. What state are you in?If you do the math on axle ratios and transmission output ratios you get a clearer picture. Back when RAM offered a 6-speed tranny with a 3:92 axle ratio and then began offering the new 8-speed with a 3:21 axel ratio the RAM forums went nuts. The math proved the 8-speed with a 3:21 axle ratio had lower gearing off the line than the 6-speed transmission with a 3:92 axle ratio. Lacking critical thought, the forums were not happy.
There is no shortage of opinion base justification but in usage cases, axle ratio decisions should be made on need. I can see that if one is going to be towing in the upper ranges of the vehicle's capacity and in areas that will cause a high amount of stop-and-go driving, then a 3:92 would be a better choice offering less stress on the drive line.
There is also the case for the age group that likes "jackrabbit" launches and/or traffic cowboying where a 3:92 will promote their desires.
Then there are drivers like me, older, living in a rural area, driving typical at speeds 50 MPH or more, minimal stop and go, and occasionally towing less than 7K pounds, 3:21s. The devil is always in the details which are typically not presented in opinion based posts.
Before I bought my 2022 ECO I had a 2013 HEMI RAM 1500, drove in the same areas as I now do, towed the same loads, and that 2013 also had a 3:21 axle ratio. I much prefer the ECODiesel as a daily driver and also for towing my lighter loads.
Since one's driving style is the major contributor to the vehicle's achieved MPG, it is difficult to compare the same vehicle with two different drivers, this is most obvious when reading forums and seeing what is posted for MPGs.
For your case, I say leave your axle ratios alone. In my 3:21 ECO, driving at 75 MPH, my engine is spinning at 1,650 RPMs and I'm realizing anywhere between 32.6 and 34.2 MPG on the open flat roadways. I've never driven the same vehicle with 3:92s so I can't compare the MPGs but I would think that spinning your engine 350 RPM faster than mine isn't going to make much difference in MPG. Likely your driving style and the cetane level in California fuel are going to be the major contributors to your mileage.
I did these tests on cruise control on flat ground with little to no braking and refrained from flooring the accelerator - so almost optimal conditions.
It wasnt very windy either.