3.0L Hurricane Updates?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
1,969
Reaction score
3,124
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Very interesting topic and views on it.
Hasnt Ford and the Cummings been going back and forth on the numbers over the last couple years ?
1000+ numbers are incredible.

I don't know if I mentioned it in this thread already but yes the 2024 power stroke is apparently 500 hp and 1200 lb/ft of torque.

But I'm not one for peak numbers, couldn't care less about peak hp/torque. GM with the duramax is going the better direction, they're not going to focus anymore on peak numbers, but instead they're focusing on getting you more torque (25% IIRC) under the curve. Which means it will feel really strong when towing in normal RPM ranges even though they're down considerably on peak numbers.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
5,291
Reaction score
13,154
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
Are they getting rid of the 36k warranty too?!? It’ll last as long as the most popular lease and warranty.

Warranty is the only consequence? Not loss of vehicle use until new engine is available and installed?

Sure would impact me.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
5,291
Reaction score
13,154
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
I don't know if I mentioned it in this thread already but yes the 2024 power stroke is apparently 500 hp and 1200 lb/ft of torque.

But I'm not one for peak numbers, couldn't care less about peak hp/torque. GM with the duramax is going the better direction, they're not going to focus anymore on peak numbers, but instead they're focusing on getting you more torque (25% IIRC) under the curve. Which means it will feel really strong when towing in normal RPM ranges even though they're down considerably on peak numbers.

Say what?!

Marketing for knowledgeable owners?! Heresy, I say!!

P.S. - I just cammed my motorcycle the same way - for traction, not freeway racing.
 

Riccochet

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Posts
1,426
Reaction score
955
Location
Somewhere around Charlotte
Ram Year
2020 2500 Laramie Longhorn
Engine
6.4
Very interesting topic and views on it.
Hasnt Ford and the Cummings been going back and forth on the numbers over the last couple years ?
1000+ numbers are incredible.
Which begs the question: At what point are you pushing the platform to where reliability is negatively impacted?

The past couple years neither engine have been known for their reliability. Whether that is a direct result, or a culmination of factors around the increase in performance is debatable.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
5,291
Reaction score
13,154
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
Which begs the question: At what point are you pushing the platform to where reliability is negatively impacted?

The past couple years neither engine have been known for their reliability. Whether that is a direct result, or a culmination of factors around the increase in performance is debatable.

Ford EcoBoost started letting go ~ 70,000 miles, sooner for those that towed a lot. Outside of warranty period. Coincidence?
Not from my perspective as a retired industry engineering manager. Everything is done on total lowest cost calculations.
Small stressed motors to meet EPA mileage standards were one approach, cylinder cutouts were the other. Both have issues.
 

tjfdesmo

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Posts
2,043
Reaction score
3,533
Location
AZ
I don't know if I mentioned it in this thread already but yes the 2024 power stroke is apparently 500 hp and 1200 lb/ft of torque.

But I'm not one for peak numbers, couldn't care less about peak hp/torque. GM with the duramax is going the better direction, they're not going to focus anymore on peak numbers, but instead they're focusing on getting you more torque (25% IIRC) under the curve. Which means it will feel really strong when towing in normal RPM ranges even though they're down considerably on peak numbers.
I have a '24 Duramax on order, and will see how it goes.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Military
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
5,291
Reaction score
13,154
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
I have a '24 Duramax on order, and will see how it goes.

Did they get the 10 speed trans fixed?

btw, it's not an Allison. It's a Ford/GM joint venture transmission with an Allison sticker on it to deceptively brand it as better than it is. Blatant dishonesty.
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
1,969
Reaction score
3,124
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Did they get the 10 speed trans fixed?

btw, it's not an Allison. It's a Ford/GM joint venture transmission with an Allison sticker on it to deceptively brand it as better than it is. Blatant dishonesty.

I don't see it that way. It's not the same transmission as the Ford/GM 10 speed used in the half tons.

Here is a relevant quote from dieselhub.com:
The 10L1000 was designed by GM engineers whom relied on close collaboration with Allison Transmission throughout the design process, noting specifically that the transmission was "validated" by Allison through rigorous testing and review of GM's design. As the transmission carries the Allison namesake, one can only assume that the 10L1000 has earned Allison's stamp of approval. GM asserts the 10L1000 is entirely separate in design from the smaller 10L80 built for 1/2 ton applications; the gear ratio spread is clearly different between the two transmissions.

I remember watching videos on this from GM engineers too, can't find them back in a 10 second search but it's clearly a different transmission, and Allison was definitely involved at some level. They didn't just slap a sticker on it with their name.

In any case, it appears to be a really good transmission so far, and I'd trust it way before the Chrysler transmission used in the Ram SO heavy duty's.
 

tjfdesmo

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Posts
2,043
Reaction score
3,533
Location
AZ
Did they get the 10 speed trans fixed?

btw, it's not an Allison. It's a Ford/GM joint venture transmission with an Allison sticker on it to deceptively brand it as better than it is. Blatant dishonesty.
I am fully aware that the only thing Allison is the emblem on the hood. Initially, they were careful to say "Allison branded", but that quickly faded away. I have seen a teardown video of the 10L1000 vs 10R140, and they are not identical at all, but clearly came from the same basic design.

All that aside, one of my biggest disappointments with my '19 HO was the Aisin. It's a clanging banging stumblebum, and they sorely need to move on from it. I won't even address the 68RFE.

This was not an easy decision after 20 years of preaching the Cummins gospel, and I have had absolutely terrible service from every GM vehicle I have owned. It is 20 years since I lemon lawed my last GM, and that was over an Allison issue they refused to fix.
 
Last edited:

Dusty

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Posts
925
Reaction score
895
Location
Rochester, New York
Ram Year
2019
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Companies have a desire and responsibility to stay in business. The automobile industry is heavily regulated and must conform to governmental mandated regulation regardless of personal likes or dislikes. Ford invested "millions" into new engines (as quoted in a previous message) and fortunately they have the financial depth to do so. Some might question if they really needed to do that, especially in the light duty segment. Personally, I think that decision was based on corporate ego, as most auto companies are always on the quest to have better numbers than their competition. That's why we have half-tons in the light duty segment that have payload and towing ratings that were once the domain of 2500-3500 trucks not long ago.

Many are bemoaning Ram's direction with the new Hurricane motor as if this is going to be the only power plant for heavy duties. It's possible, but the evidence so far seems to indicate that engine's destination is for cars and 1500s. I suspect either the 5.7 or 6.4 will soldier on for a little while longer. Being a smaller company with relatively limited resources compared to Ford and GM, maybe the decision to invest in all electric half-tons is a priority that overshadows the immediate need for a larger, newer platform V8 which might have a short future. After all, the tea leaves indicate that zero emissions requirements, which are not that far off, will strongly affect the light-duty truck market, especially heavy duties.

In my own state the current administration is looking to ban heavy duty sales for private use (non-commercial), anyways. Through taxation and other punitive legal methods, the quest for zero emissions will necessitate serious cultural changes that will impact the U.S. automobile market. and force people to convert their current automotive desires.

Regards,
Dusty
2019 Ram 1500 Billet Silver Laramie Quad Cab 2WD, 5.7 Hemi, 8HP75, 3.21 axle, 33-gallon fuel tank, factory dual exhaust, 18” wheels. Build Daye: 3 June 2018. Now at 86355 miles.
 
Top