"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence,"
The question isn't if there is a problem with 140.
The question is if it has any benefit over 90.
The answer so far is no.
We will Never Know!! Now will we?
Reverse that question: What benefit does 90 hold over 110/140?
Possibly/Maybe a very slight mpg difference? Our government would be thrilled!
I honestly see nothing else.
If 90wt was required? I would totally have different thinking & run it. (No questions asked)
So what difference does it make what viscosity or brand each owner uses? It doesn’t!
Just don’t ever try to convince me that 90wt offers lower wear & longer longevity compared to 140 or 110 viscosity gear oils. (That’s it in a nutshell)
If there is ANY (Actual/Truthfull) evidence out there that shows or proves this please post it here. I just have never witnessed it.
I myself don’t give 2 Hoots what others use or run. It’s No Concern of mine.
My Ram is my only concern.
I’m not paying any extra for the 75W-110 so I see no benefits I’m missing out on.
One more time & I’ll walk away: I have no issue with 75W-90! (Never have) I only want to experience running 75W-110. Im just not a follower! (Never Have / Never Will)
There is a HUGE difference between Recommended & Required.
Ok: I apologize I’m done.
I want to thank my wife for not having blind faith in the 2 A$$ hat doctors 19 yrs ago that attempted to think they New best due to a degree & diagnosed my health issue totally wrong.
I would not be here today if not for her calling BS & thinking outside the box & getting another doctor involved with totally different opinion.