Dyno results underwhelming

[Ramsfan78]

Just curious what kind of intake you have? I can't see sigs on my tablet incase it is listed there. I think after I do my muffler Monday I'll have the same mods as you and will be waiting to do LTs. I bet after LTs and maybe have a new tune written it will step up the hp and trq numbers.

I'm running an S&B

 

[Ramsfan78]

Here's a link to the pull from today. Not that it shows anything but I figured I'd throw it up here. Ha.

https://youtu.be/IiDLWl8szVw

 

[Ramsfan78]

Just curious what kind of intake you have? I can't see sigs on my tablet incase it is listed there. I think after I do my muffler Monday I'll have the same mods as you and will be waiting to do LTs. I bet after LTs and maybe have a new tune written it will step up the hp and trq numbers.

Here is my signature:

Tint side and back | Bed Cover | Spray In Bed Liner | 2x 10" RF Subs | 500 Watt Kicker Amp | Debadged | Tailgate Ram Eyes | Painted Engine Cover | Painted Fuse Box Lid | Painted Radiator Cover | Lighted S&B CAI w/ scoop | DOD14" | DS Trinity - Hemifever Tuned | Pillar Pod | 87mm TB | 180 T-Stat | Killerglass Radiator Hose | Billet Tech Catch Can

 

[WadXpress]

Nice. Yea I'll have the same engine mods as you after Monday I'm putting on a 14" also. I have the vararam intake and the 8speed with 3.21s. Your numbers give me a good baseline though. Thanks. I'm looking forward to seeing your numbers after the LTs and a fresh tune. Good luck.Hopefully you get the numbers that you are expecting

 

[Broke pilot]

You were on a dyno jet. It says it on your read outs you posted lol... I was just making a ballpark statement in that what kind of dyno you use matters. Like I said, mustang dunks are usually a little lower on numbers than a dyno jet. But like Matt said, just make sure fr here on you continue to use that same dyno for comparison numbers after mods.

 

[BlownGP]

You were on a dyno jet. It says it on your read outs you posted lol... I was just making a ballpark statement in that what kind of dyno you use matters. Like I said, mustang dunks are usually a little lower on numbers than a dyno jet. But like Matt said, just make sure fr here on you continue to use that same dyno for comparison numbers after mods.

Mustang dynos put a load on the car as if it were actually driving on the road, hence why the numbers are lower then dynojets which dont put a load on the motor and offer less resistance.

For the mods you have and taking into account what these trucks dyno stock. That's not bad.


Kinda sad how much drive train loss there is with the 5/6 speeds trucks but that's the way it is..lol

 

[CMil527]

Just curious what kind of intake you have? I can't see sigs on my tablet incase it is listed there. I think after I do my muffler Monday I'll have the same mods as you and will be waiting to do LTs. I bet after LTs and maybe have a new tune written it will step up the hp and trq numbers.

He has an S&B...

 

[hemidup]

My parnter owned a Dynacom (same as a Dynojet) and now has a Mustang. The Mustang numbers average around 10% lower but are far truer. However I can use the Mustang with the 1/8 or 1/4 mile simulator software and log 15 PID's during a pull. Saves alot of money and time than going to the track where you might only get a few passes in a day. Can't do that with a Dynojet.

 

[dhay13]

These trucks only make about 300hp stock, so it is actually closer to a 25% drivetrain loss on the 5 and 6 speed trucks

ouch

 

[badvik]

LT+custom tune
http://www.ramforum.com/f44/2013_ram_dyno_results-67128/

330 for an almost serial truck, just with non-custom tune - is not bad. Usually the ones with 6sp show 300-310 (a lot ot dynos on YT). 330 - is a level of stock 8-sp truck.
Though the numbers are not perfect they are still the estimation of your efforts.

 

[powderbrad]

Never as high as one wants.

Id say 350-60 with longtubes.

Kinda what I expect to be around. And its still never fast enough!!