Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Looks good. One thing though, I'm not sure where you live, but I can't think of any US state where having it on with the high beams on the road would be legal. Unless you never use your high beams on-road, you may want to move it to an independent switch.
-K
Why would it not be legal on the high beams? Always switch to lows with oncoming traffic anyways
I just realized I could see your Maine license plate in your picture and did a lookup. Looks like Maine has very little to say about aux lighting. The only item I can see that they might be able to catch you on is section 4. Please note though, I am neither a lawyer nor a LEO, just someone who has a done a lot of research on the lighting I can get away with in NY and the states I travel to regularly.
http://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/29-A/title29-Asec1909-B.html
1. General restrictions. Except as otherwise provided by section 2054 and any other law or rule, a vehicle may be equipped with or display an auxiliary light, as defined by section 2054, subsection 1, paragraph C, only if it conforms to the requirements of this section.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
2. Color. The color of an auxiliary light must be as follows:
A. White or amber if the light is on the front of the vehicle; [2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW).]
B. Amber if the light is on the side of the vehicle; or [2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW).]
C. Amber or red if the light is on the rear of the vehicle. [2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW).]
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
3. Beam. An auxiliary light must emit a steady beam of light and may not blink, oscillate, rotate or flash.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
4. Brightness. An auxiliary light may not emit a beam that is brighter than, has a greater candlepower than or distracts from the visibility of standard lighting equipment required by this Title or by the inspection rules adopted by the Chief of the State Police pursuant to section 1769.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
5. Operator visibility. An auxiliary light may not be installed in a manner or on the vehicle so that it distracts or impairs the vision of the operator.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
6. Under-vehicle lighting. An auxiliary light is under-vehicle lighting if it is a lighting device or lamp, including, but not limited to, a neon or fluorescent tube, installed under the chassis and it is designed to illuminate and reflect from the surface beneath the vehicle. A vehicle may be equipped with under-vehicle lighting for the purpose of participating in shows, events or other exhibitions, but the lighting may not be used or the vehicle illuminated with under-vehicle lighting on a public way.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
7. Violation. A person who operates a motor vehicle equipped with, illuminated by, displaying or using an auxiliary light in violation of this section commits a traffic infraction.
[ 2005, c. 183, §1 (NEW) .]
-K
Yes I looked it up and section 4 was the only thing that really looked like it applied to this, Maine is pretty lax on vehicle laws like this really, we have tint laws that say you can’t be lower than 35% on front windows and my last 4 trucks have been 20% never had a problem with it. I ll see what happens, I love the added light when driving, gives a lot more opportunity to catch animals like deer or moose jumping in the road before you’re on top of them. Thanks for the advice!