Mevotech TTX control arms

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

OP
OP
FF1899

FF1899

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2018
Posts
535
Reaction score
312
Location
Syracuse NY
Ram Year
2018
Engine
5.7
They are standard angle not angle correction so yes they are just a stronger version of stock and offer a little more articulation
 

ram1500rsm

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Posts
4,817
Reaction score
5,283
Location
Trabuco Canyon, CA
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I don't have any experience with the Mevotech arms but they seem to be same lenght/offset as the stockers as judged by pictures and other people comments. Their BJ has a zerk provision to add grease? and the arms themselves seem beefier with respect to stock. If that is the case the BJ movement should be the same as stock and offer no camber or caster correction past what the stockers can do, This comes into play if you're lifting with an adjustable strut or coilover while keeping the factory spindles.

If your truck is lifted with an aftermarket spindle that will maintain stock UCA geometry you want a factory UCA that will work the same as stock unless you're lifting past that point, say 4" spindle + 5100 at 2.8" or 6" spindle + 5100's at 2.8" lift (I don't know much about this type of lifts just what i read around here so feel free to correct me) The dude asking to use Mevotech UCA's with his Bilsteins at 2.8 will benefit from UCA's that have been built with an offset for 2-3" lift.

You can see the differences in lenght/offset here: scroll down for the pics Stock UCA vs Zone for example:
https://www.ramforum.com/posts/1008427/

Any offset aftermarket UCA will offer more caster/camber correction with respect of the stockers if you're lifted between 2-3" with factory spindles, BJ swing (assuming the UCA uses a factory style BJ) is the same in either case, but they have an offset built into the arm that will allow the BJ to have a better range of motion as the strut cycles up and down without the BJ in theory going into a binding position. This is the reason when you try to use one of them with a lifting spindle that uses stock UCA's that the BJ's won't work as expected because the correction built into the arm hinders the BJ movement at stock height or worst when the strut cycles up/down, Hoping to make sense here.

If the UCA uses a factory style BJ the difference in movement/angles come from simply having that offset that will maintain a better BJ angle as the UCAs cycle up/down given variances in the terrain, not only when they're at rest. The most travel on the BJ comes from something like JBA's, Icon Delta join or anything that uses a uniball BJ to do the job, asides from the offset built into the arm, or built into the BJ itself or both. offset will give more caster/camber correction if your application needs such a thing.
 
Last edited:

Daniel Ibarra

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Posts
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Ram Year
2014
Engine
5.7
Did you get rid of the Ready lift uca's? If not, I'd be interested in taing them off your hands.
 

daveray9

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Posts
1,698
Reaction score
585
Ram Year
2020
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I have both upper and lower Mevotechs with my Fabtech lift and they are great!
Solid and heavy duty.
I’ve had my
Lowers on for a year and just swapped out my uppers for mevo about 6 months ago.
No issues with them.

About to do this same thing as the bolts in my lowers are frozen. Any issues long term with these? I'm about to buy both upper/lower arms.
 

Hemi395

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Posts
8,978
Reaction score
15,637
Location
Cape Cod MA
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Just found my upper ball joint boot on the passengers side was torn today so I have a set of these coming. Glad to see people are happy with them.
 

daveray9

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Posts
1,698
Reaction score
585
Ram Year
2020
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Just found my upper ball joint boot on the passengers side was torn today so I have a set of these coming. Glad to see people are happy with them.

How do they ride, I never got around to ordering them. I do have to replace the LCAs so was debating Zones but these MEVO TTX seems cheaper and probably worth saving the $$
 

Hemi395

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Posts
8,978
Reaction score
15,637
Location
Cape Cod MA
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
How do they ride, I never got around to ordering them. I do have to replace the LCAs so was debating Zones but these MEVO TTX seems cheaper and probably worth saving the $$
Havent put them in yet, I've been too lazy[emoji23]
 

smoothee

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Posts
1,321
Reaction score
684
Location
St. John's, NL
Ram Year
2011
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Would I be better off going with these over the Moog "Heavy Duty" line, CK621897 & CK620634, despite the awful color? I don't do much offroading, just looking for factory replacements as mine are starting to go at 60k miles.
 

DILLIGAF

Senior Member
Military
Joined
May 28, 2016
Posts
4,255
Reaction score
7,687
Location
Canada
Ram Year
2012
Engine
5.7
Just got all my TTX stuff in today.

165648650_10159432166588552_3235331816616896173_o.jpg

164767902_10159432166733552_4392700807752244360_o.jpg

165790771_10159432167083552_6350280785521766598_o.jpg

164557852_10159432167168552_8072654099257366625_o.jpg
 

MoparFin

U. S. Navy Vet - AS1
Military
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Posts
361
Reaction score
242
Location
PA
Ram Year
2018
Engine
3.6
Will these work with a 2.5” spacer lift?
 
Top