Mpg

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

SouthTexan

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Posts
2,149
Reaction score
1,305
Ram Year
2014
Engine
408 CTD
I would rephrase that to not bad for a gas 2500. That is a normal EVIC mpg for most diesels. I am usually +/- .5 mpg of that combined city and highway driving. Hand calculated, that is another story.
 
Last edited:

mtofell

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Posts
3,055
Reaction score
3,085
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 6.4
I would rephrase that to not bad for a gas 2500. That is a normal EVIC mpg for most diesels. I am usually +/- .5 mpg of that combined city and highway driving. Hand calculated, that is another story.

I really try to give people the benefit of all doubt but EVERY thread you reply to here it some bash on a gas truck. Or, maybe "bash" is too heavy of a term. It's making a point where a diesel is better. We all get it. Your diesel truck is cool. You spent the money, your truck hauls better and gets better MPGs. That's what you paid for. It's supposed to do that.

Why should the OP "rephrase" anything. He's here to share his experience. Enough with the inferiority complex. Let people talk, share and be heard without being hassled. That's the purpose of this forum.

And save your miles of quotes and personal attacks. I won't read or post further on this thread. You are one of the most informed and knowledgeable regular posters and share GREAT information here. It's just unfortunate when it's diluted by some meaningless agenda.
 

Rampant

Senior Member
Joined
May 21, 2016
Posts
1,894
Reaction score
1,840
Location
NJ
Ram Year
2016
Engine
392 Hemi
uploadfromtaptalk1465019508550.jpg

This was on the second day I had the truck. All highway. I just wish it stayed like that lol. Its around ~14 in mixed driving now. About on par for any big truck or SUV.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 

coobie

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2016
Posts
524
Reaction score
574
Location
S.Michigan
Ram Year
2025 ram 1500
Engine
SST hurricane
I would love to see them Mpg,s :favorites13: My 2500 crew cab 4X4 average is 15.6 mpg with 3,000 miles in the OD.I am happy with that :roflsquared:
 

MN-Ram

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2015
Posts
418
Reaction score
137
Location
MN
Ram Year
2015
Engine
6.4L Hemi
Best I ever got was 17.2 hand calculated. The average I see now is around 15. But it's way better than the 9-10 I got in my V-10 2500 Ram. (And I loved that old V-10)

I haven't towed heavy yet, so that'll be an eye opener I'm sure (with regards to mpg's).
 

BlkZrx

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
444
Reaction score
377
Location
northeast IN
Ram Year
2016 2500 SLT Std. cab
Engine
Hemi 6.4
Pulling my 5000 lb. camper on mostly level 2 lane highway, averaged 10 - 11. I pulled same camper a couple times with a V6 half ton Chevy, 9 mpg. It definitely wasn't enough truck..
 

River19

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Posts
360
Reaction score
216
Location
"Live" VT, Work in MA/RI
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Hemi 6.4L
My experience has been 14-15.5mpg mixed and 9.5-11.5 towing and I'm fine with that. Larger tires, slight lift, aerodynamics of a dumpster.......

But, then again I didn't buy it for fuel economy :)
 

Danno

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2016
Posts
490
Reaction score
103
Location
Mid Atlantic
Ram Year
2016 Power Wagon
Engine
6.4
I really try to give people the benefit of all doubt but EVERY thread you reply to here it some bash on a gas truck. Or, maybe "bash" is too heavy of a term. It's making a point where a diesel is better. We all get it. Your diesel truck is cool. You spent the money, your truck hauls better and gets better MPGs. That's what you paid for. It's supposed to do that.

Why should the OP "rephrase" anything. He's here to share his experience. Enough with the inferiority complex. Let people talk, share and be heard without being hassled. That's the purpose of this forum.

And save your miles of quotes and personal attacks. I won't read or post further on this thread. You are one of the most informed and knowledgeable regular posters and share GREAT information here. It's just unfortunate when it's diluted by some meaningless agenda.

Sensitive... I would expect better mileage from a engine that has MDS.

Pulling my 5000 lb. camper on mostly level 2 lane highway, averaged 10 - 11. I pulled same camper a couple times with a V6 half ton Chevy, 9 mpg. It definitely wasn't enough truck..

So a V6 yielded 9 mpg and a 6.4 yields 10-11. Seems the v-6 did better than you thought.
 
Last edited:

SouthTexan

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Posts
2,149
Reaction score
1,305
Ram Year
2014
Engine
408 CTD
I really try to give people the benefit of all doubt but EVERY thread you reply to here it some bash on a gas truck. Or, maybe "bash" is too heavy of a term. It's making a point where a diesel is better. We all get it. Your diesel truck is cool. You spent the money, your truck hauls better and gets better MPGs. That's what you paid for. It's supposed to do that.

Why should the OP "rephrase" anything. He's here to share his experience. Enough with the inferiority complex. Let people talk, share and be heard without being hassled. That's the purpose of this forum.

And save your miles of quotes and personal attacks. I won't read or post further on this thread. You are one of the most informed and knowledgeable regular posters and share GREAT information here. It's just unfortunate when it's diluted by some meaningless agenda.


Wow, you took that pretty hard and personal. There was no bash intended there nor was I saying it to hassle him. I was just saying he might want to clarify that because A) those who are using a tablet or phone (which I was using when I read that last night) cannot see his signature in mobile webpage mode to know he has a 6.4L B) there are multiple gas engines in a 2500 along with a diesel so just saying 2500 leaves it up in the air C) if that were a diesel then that is pretty common mpg. There was no "diesel is better" bashing there like you are insinuating so calm down there turbo. Your mind is reading into things that aren't even there.
 
Last edited:

Bigdaddy

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Posts
2,422
Reaction score
486
Ram Year
2022 3500 Laramie CCLB
Engine
6.7L Diesel Cummins
Best I ever got was 17.2 hand calculated. The average I see now is around 15. But it's way better than the 9-10 I got in my V-10 2500 Ram. (And I loved that old V-10)

I haven't towed heavy yet, so that'll be an eye opener I'm sure (with regards to mpg's).


Yes it will be an eye opener for sure, but excited to see the result.
 
OP
OP
SIhemi

SIhemi

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Posts
1,424
Reaction score
680
Location
Pennslvanvia
Ram Year
2017
Engine
5.7 HEMI
Yes it will be an eye opener for sure, but excited to see the result.

I made a 350 mile trip and avg 12mpg at 50mph pulling a empty car trailer one way then back pulling a 74 dart.
 

OUMX117

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Posts
55
Reaction score
12
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I should have bought a 6.4 lol. my 5.7 1500 QCSB averages just under 14. Towing a light 2000 lbs trailer I've not been able to break 11.
 

SouthTexan

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Posts
2,149
Reaction score
1,305
Ram Year
2014
Engine
408 CTD
I should have bought a 6.4 lol. my 5.7 1500 QCSB averages just under 14. Towing a light 2000 lbs trailer I've not been able to break 11.

Few questions. Do you have oversize tires(larger diameter than stock), and have you ever checked the accuracy of your speedometer?
 

OUMX117

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Posts
55
Reaction score
12
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Few questions. Do you have oversize tires(larger diameter than stock), and have you ever checked the accuracy of your speedometer?

I have 275/65-20 toyos so barely taller than stock. My speedo is correct via a diablosport trinity. The truck also has a k&n air intake system (was on the truck when I bought it). I've been able to squeeze 17.6 out of it one time but that type of driving is not enjoyable and takes more effort than it's worth to me. I'm most likely going to trade it in for a 6.7 or an ecodiesel in the next year or so. My old '14 CCSB 2500 6.7 4x4 averaged about 17mpg.
 

SouthTexan

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Posts
2,149
Reaction score
1,305
Ram Year
2014
Engine
408 CTD
I have 275/65-20 toyos so barely taller than stock. My speedo is correct via a diablosport trinity. The truck also has a k&n air intake system (was on the truck when I bought it). I've been able to squeeze 17.6 out of it one time but that type of driving is not enjoyable and takes more effort than it's worth to me. I'm most likely going to trade it in for a 6.7 or an ecodiesel in the next year or so. My old '14 CCSB 2500 6.7 4x4 averaged about 17mpg.

I would have to wager your speedo is not 100% correct. Every vehicle I have put larger tires on and had the speedo corrected by a tuner took a few tries of of recalibrating it to get it dead on. I have never had it be exact on the first calibration and always required some configuring to match my GPS devices that tell me how fast I am really going. Then there is the factor that the speedo gets off as you loose tread. Although, one big thing that you just stated is Toyo's, which are known for being the heaviest(and best) tires out there. Heavy tires drain power and mpg due to how much it takes to turn them.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
210,912
Posts
3,059,552
Members
170,842
Latest member
stevenmicheal
Back
Top