Suzuki built and sold a lot of Boulevard (C50 & C90) bikes that had a flawed power system & a flawed oil delivery system. For some reason they chose to address this in a limited recall that did NOT address the problem in all bikes affected. Both were easily fixable. The power system with a more direct wiring solution & as quite often was necessary, a better quality generator or relocation of the current generator where it could get better airflow. The flawed oil delivery system & not enough power to actually charge the battery at idle were fixed by a 100 rpm increase to idle.
There is no doubt Suzuki knew about the issues. Money was likely the big issue in the case of the power system (Suzuki would end up phasing out the bikes for a number of years) and something as simply as effecting the sound of that big twin on a Suzuki C90 when everyone wanted an engine that loped like a Harley, affected the 2nd issue. Hell, guys were playing with tweaking down the idle from stock making charging & lube issues worse!
As has been said before, its cheaper for FCA to fix the number of hemis that are reported as having issues than to do a recall of course, coupled with the idea of the 5.7 being an end of generation engine. I just don't expect FCA to put any money into refining the old beast any further or a minimal amount. My questions are:
-I wonder how many hemis are not reported as they are repurposed to a 2nd, 3rd owner then rebuilt down the road or just become an end of service vehicle overall. Or people simply don't pay much attention to the engine sound? I do believe being on a Ram enthusiasts forum we live in somewhat of a bubble where every issue is amplified.
-my bigger question is: what would it take to trigger an actual recall? I assume safety issues is the best bet & this wouldn't qualify. I would never assume that because our cost to fix this is extraordinary, that that would be a trigger for FCA!
Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk