6112 question, installing these on 2014 1500 quad cab 5.7. What would be some negatives for using clip 9 location?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

DILLIGAF

Senior Member
Canadian Forces
Joined
May 28, 2016
Posts
5,784
Reaction score
12,395
Location
Canada
Ram Year
2012
Engine
5.7
The CV angles at 2.8 is bad enough.
 

crazykid1994

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Posts
5,063
Reaction score
5,064
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hemi 5.7
A lot of preload means less down travel and what little rebound you will have will feel very tight and stiff because of the lack of down travel. You can run it a bit shorter at the #6 or #7 setting and purchase a rough country spacer that lifts 1/2” and that will help with less preload. That’s how I have mine setup and a few others as well with no issues so far.
The CV angles at 2.8 is bad enough.
It still blows my mind you had an issue. I’m at 3” and my cv angle is slightly angled down. It’s odd how some trucks respond so much differently to different setups. I do plan on going back to 2.5” instead of 3” when I swap to the fox 2.5 dsc though.
 

Attachments

  • 4EB9A8D7-2A03-462F-91EA-A4E2E0C34598.jpeg
    4EB9A8D7-2A03-462F-91EA-A4E2E0C34598.jpeg
    190.3 KB · Views: 18
OP
OP
D

Dvst8err

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Posts
16
Reaction score
11
Location
CA
Ram Year
2014
Engine
5.7
The CV angles at 2.8 is bad enough.
the cv’s seem like a potential issue
 
OP
OP
D

Dvst8err

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Posts
16
Reaction score
11
Location
CA
Ram Year
2014
Engine
5.7
A lot of preload means less down travel and what little rebound you will have will feel very tight and stiff because of the lack of down travel. You can run it a bit shorter at the #6 or #7 setting and purchase a rough country spacer that lifts 1/2” and that will help with less preload. That’s how I have mine setup and a few others as well with no issues so far.

It still blows my mind you had an issue. I’m at 3” and my cv angle is slightly angled down. It’s odd how some trucks respond so much differently to different setups. I do plan on going back to 2.5” instead of 3” when I swap to the fox 2.5 dsc though.

Is there a consensus on the 6 or 7 setting? Why are you going back to 2.5?
 

crazykid1994

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Posts
5,063
Reaction score
5,064
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Is there a consensus on the 6 or 7 setting? Why are you going back to 2.5?
Cv angle and ride quality honestly. And height is up to you. Mine isn’t severe at all but it will prolong the life being more neutral. Plus having less preload and more down travel will improve ride quality off-roading. If you are strictly a street truck then that won’t be much of an issue for you because you won’t be bouncing around and maxing your suspension like I do at times.
 
OP
OP
D

Dvst8err

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Posts
16
Reaction score
11
Location
CA
Ram Year
2014
Engine
5.7
Sounds like the 0.5 spacer is the better way to go. Appreciate the input, thank you.
 

crazykid1994

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Posts
5,063
Reaction score
5,064
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2017
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Sounds like the 0.5 spacer is the better way to go. Appreciate the input, thank you.
This is the kit but you do not use the preload spacer. Only the small plate that goes above. The reason to use this one and not any other is the hole in the middle is smaller and prevents the bushing in the top hat from having space to move around.
 
Back
Top