We need a picture attached to threads in this section so that it shows up on the main page.
My apologies; I hadn't realized that. I just assumed that it would pick up the lead picture from the link. I've added it.
If you like the truck overall, I wouldn’t let this news be the dealbreaker.
Being
way ahead in mapped miles was actually part of the draw. GM has twice as much usably mapped as Ford (or is it three?), and Stellantis another multiple of GM.
Here in Las Vegas, other than the state's portion of the beltway and the interstates themselves, Ford barely has double digits of miles mapped. Boulder Highway, and that was about it last time I looked.
I can generally understand the folks that don't want it, and almost understand those opposed to drivers that need it--I don't think that automatic transmissions should be allowed on the driving test, and I'm less than convinced that
synchronized transmissions and automatic spark advance should be allowed!
But when I'm not being crotchety, my statistical skills are sufficient to realize that the more automation we get, the more inadequate drivers we pull out from behind the wheel. I have no serious doubt that Tesla, Stellantis, and Daimler all outperform the bottom three quartiles, and probably even the bottom four quintiles. Not on every single task, especially when specifically concentrating for testing, but over the course of the year.
But that's not the only issue. Driving my wife's little trucklet with adaptive cruise control, I've found that being able to sit with out my leg actively working the accelerator causes less muscle strain, and letting the lane centering position the car, with my hand just hanging on the edge reduces that strain, too. And I have no delusions that, even though I don't notice it, it's not helping with mental fatigue too. I'm also able to spend a bit more time on my eyes looping through the mirrors.
It's not much of a big deal on short trips, but at a couple of hundred miles, the difference is noticeable.
We really don't
need two daily drivers at this point. When we have simultaneous use for a vehicle, it's nearly always for one of my car events, to which I can take a classic!
The only real calls for a truck for me are:
1) I'm 6'2", and fit a truck a lot better than a car or trucklet, and
2) acquiring classic cars, and hauling them until they can drive on their own.
(we didn't even need a trucklet for her, but a) I can afford it, and b) she's always wanted one. Oh, and c), the step up to a truck is big for her back).
Anyway, after all of that, the
reason I came over to post is that it occurred to me after a couple of days that the
liability cost could be driving this for Stellantis. At level 3, most at fault accidents will be a product defect for which the manufacturer is on the hook. I don't think anyone really has a handle on how much this will cost, and I kind of expect them to trickle, rather than gush, into the market while the green visor folks keep an eagle eye.
Miles mapped and drivable at level 2 mean a lot more to me than level 3 or how long it runs--as long as it's available before my kids start eyeing my keys a couple of decades from now! (for my parents, it would make a huge difference in just a year or two . . .)