Poll- Do you like MDS?

Do you like MDS?


  • Total voters
    326

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

retired

Votes republican and identifies as a he/him
Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Posts
2,172
Reaction score
2,781
Location
montana
Ram Year
2020
Engine
6.4
I can tell zero difference whether or not it is kicked in. I do know i get great mpg on my 6.4 so maybe it is working. Just drove from missoula to boise yesterday and hand figured 16.8mpg
 
OP
OP
Burla

Burla

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
23,460
Reaction score
45,566
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
Thanks to Corey's research we know even though they shut down 4 cylinders, they also send twice the gas to the working cylinders, no kidding. I would like to see more guys actual test actual mileage, not what evic says, on both trips, one with mds on and one with it off.
 

Hemi395

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Posts
9,004
Reaction score
15,734
Location
Cape Cod MA
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Thanks to Corey's research we know even though they shut down 4 cylinders, they also send twice the gas to the working cylinders, no kidding. I would like to see more guys actual test actual mileage, not what evic says, on both trips, one with mds on and one with it off.
I keep meaning to get a video of that. You can literally watch the the non mds cylinders double the injector PW when MDS activates.

It also seems logical that the system creates uneven wear between the MDS and non MDS cylinders...
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
2,927
Reaction score
5,503
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Ford is definitely not "back to regular V8's" in any sense other than continuing to offer the same 5.0L they have had for eons.

It's been updated for 2021(?), it now puts out 5 more HP than my hemi does, and the same amount of torque, even while being short .7 liters.

Reviewers have found it to be faster than our 1500's, which is not surprising since the truck is 100's of pounds lighter but putting down the same power. Ram needs to up their game!
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
2,310
Reaction score
3,859
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
It's been updated for 2021(?), it now puts out 5 more HP than my hemi does, and the same amount of torque, even while being short .7 liters.

Reviewers have found it to be faster than our 1500's, which is not surprising since the truck is 100's of pounds lighter but putting down the same power. Ram needs to up their game!

The Coyote is a solid motor, no doubt, and Ford keeps doing tweaks to keep it relevant and selling. Which is good, get their money out of it (and I am a stockholder, so buy Ford to help me retire earlier). But that doesn't mean Ford has pivoted back to the V8. Take a look at where there R&D money is being spent. Hint: It's not in V8 development.
 
OP
OP
Burla

Burla

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
23,460
Reaction score
45,566
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
I keep meaning to get a video of that. You can literally watch the the non mds cylinders double the injector PW when MDS activates.

It also seems logical that the system creates uneven wear between the MDS and non MDS cylinders...
Yes, on the face it "appears" there is zero benefit to mds in activation, and to be worse it can create wear by changing cylinders normal function. I would have like to see them just have a 4 cylinder ram for those who want gas mileage, maybe lighten the body to compensate and call it a commuter truck and don't tow with it.

HP is just part of the equation, I got beat to the punch by a freaking 90's chevy tahoe, something I don't even like talking about how way less HP toasted my ram, I had to lift, he straight beat me. Maybe gears, maybe just those chevy transmissions, but whatever the reason HP isn't everything. I believe the holeshot was a wash, he just had better power at the wheels.
 

retired

Votes republican and identifies as a he/him
Joined
Aug 19, 2020
Posts
2,172
Reaction score
2,781
Location
montana
Ram Year
2020
Engine
6.4
Yes, on the face it "appears" there is zero benefit to mds in activation, and to be worse it can create wear by changing cylinders normal function. I would have like to see them just have a 4 cylinder ram for those who want gas mileage, maybe lighten the body to compensate and call it a commuter truck and don't tow with it.

HP is just part of the equation, I got beat to the punch by a freaking 90's chevy tahoe, something I don't even like talking about how way less HP toasted my ram, I had to lift, he straight beat me. Maybe gears, maybe just those chevy transmissions, but whatever the reason HP isn't everything. I believe the holeshot was a wash, he just had better power at the wheels.
One thing I am dissatisfied with in my 6.4 is in the power category. Ford 7.3 smokes it and just feels more relaxed doing it. Ram is in need of updating their v8s
 

bcbouy

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Posts
1,730
Reaction score
1,187
Location
pitt meadows/100 mile house
Ram Year
2021 power wagon
Engine
hemi
I hated it more in my 5.7L- seemed much more intrusive.
I started switching it off every time I put it in drive cause I hated the vibration in the pedals (and sound).
For whatever reason I rarely notice it in my 6.4L...
i wonder if it's the 5.7 light duty trucks that feel the mds more than the 6.4 heavy duties? i don't notice it in my p/w unless i actually look at the gauge and see the little green mds lighted up.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Military
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
2,310
Reaction score
3,859
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
i wonder if it's the 5.7 light duty trucks that feel the mds more than the 6.4 heavy duties? i don't notice it in my p/w unless i actually look at the gauge and see the little green mds lighted up.

I never feel it and I have the 5.7 in a 2012. Maybe the 6 speed vs 8 speed? Maybe different programming? I dunno, like I said it's invisible to me.
 

2012RAM1500RT

Senior Member
TOTM Winner
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Posts
2,224
Reaction score
4,153
Location
nowhere
Yes, on the face it "appears" there is zero benefit to mds in activation, and to be worse it can create wear by changing cylinders normal function. I would have like to see them just have a 4 cylinder ram for those who want gas mileage, maybe lighten the body to compensate and call it a commuter truck and don't tow with it.

HP is just part of the equation, I got beat to the punch by a freaking 90's chevy tahoe, something I don't even like talking about how way less HP toasted my ram, I had to lift, he straight beat me. Maybe gears, maybe just those chevy transmissions, but whatever the reason HP isn't everything. I believe the holeshot was a wash, he just had better power at the wheels.
Probably sucking the bottle!
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
2,927
Reaction score
5,503
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
The Coyote is a solid motor, no doubt, and Ford keeps doing tweaks to keep it relevant and selling. Which is good, get their money out of it (and I am a stockholder, so buy Ford to help me retire earlier). But that doesn't mean Ford has pivoted back to the V8. Take a look at where there R&D money is being spent. Hint: It's not in V8 development.

I agree when it comes to the F150, it's definitely turbo/electric. But they're still heavily investing in the v8, this latest update cost them a lot of money and so did the 7.3 in the super duty. It's still very much up front on their radar.
 

Octane

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2019
Posts
1,540
Reaction score
2,091
Location
U S.A.
Thanks to Corey's research we know even though they shut down 4 cylinders, they also send twice the gas to the working cylinders, no kidding. I would like to see more guys actual test actual mileage, not what evic says, on both trips, one with mds on and one with it off.
I actually did a 200 mile round trip.100 miles without mds and 100 with it Best I could figure about 1/2 mpg better with mds.
You're welcome...I saved the planet! Lol
 
Last edited:

tones2SS

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
10,447
Reaction score
2,698
Location
MA
Ram Year
2016
Engine
Hemi 5.7
So,.........it's safe to say, the MDS SUCKS!!!!
lol

If we wanted a 4 cylinder or V6, we would have bought a smaller truck or smaller engine engine truck. GIVE ME BACK MY FULL TIME V8!!!!!!!
 

turkeybird56

Military Vet 1976-1996 Retired US Army
Military
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
19,459
Reaction score
44,446
Location
Central Texas
Ram Year
2019 Bighorn, 4 X 4, 3.21 rear, Bright Flame Red Pearl Coat, Mopar tonneau cover,Westin Bed rug
Engine
Hemi 5.7
So,.........it's safe to say, the MDS SUCKS!!!!
lol

If we wanted a 4 cylinder or V6, we would have bought a smaller truck or smaller engine engine truck. GIVE ME BACK MY FULL TIME V8!!!!!!!
Big a*** DITTO THERE !!!!!
 

2012RAM1500RT

Senior Member
TOTM Winner
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Posts
2,224
Reaction score
4,153
Location
nowhere
As it stands right now if you take the percent of the ones that don't prefer MDS and the ones that hate it with a passion and give them half of the ones that has no opinion either way, then take the percent of the ones that like it and give them the other half of the ones that have no opinion either way it looks like 70% don't like it and 30% does like it! So to me salesman was wrong!
 

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
2,927
Reaction score
5,503
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
Fun with stats! We can make them look like anything. Did you know that on average, every human has 1 test!cle??

In my opinion though, it's worse than what @2012RAM1500RT said; only 25% actually want it, the ones who don't care are excluded from the weighting because they're not going to buy or not buy a hemi if it has MDS. So if this was back in 2006 at the weekly hemi staff meeting and some guys says "hey lets make it work with 4 cylinders" and they wanted to know if it was a good idea; there is only 25% of ramforum members who value the feature, therefore from a risk/cost analysis perspective, it's kind of a fail.

Of course we have the benefit of 20/20 vision, I doubt Ram knew it would work so poorly in real life before committing to the idea.
 
Top