Ram Hurricane engine chief engineer explains: Why Hemi 5.7L V8 was replaced

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Ram Hurricane engine chief engineer explains: Why Hemi 5.7L V8 was replaced, stop changing oil every 3,000 miles​

1781114065326.png


Story by Tim Esterdahl


The replacement of the Hemi 5.7L V8 as Ram’s top engine remains one of the most controversial decisions in recent Ram truck history. Yet according to the Ram Hurricane engine chief engineer responsible for both the Hemi engine and the new Hurricane inline-six, the move wasn’t simply about emissions regulations.

In an interview, Stellantis Director of Propulsion Systems Alan Falowski explained why the company developed the 3.0-liter Hurricane twin-turbo inline-six, how it was engineered to replace the Hemi and why many common concerns about turbocharged engines may be rooted in outdated thinking.

Why Ram Chose an Inline-Six Instead of Another V8​

Falowski said the Hurricane program began with a simple objective: create an engine that could outperform the Hemi in every meaningful category.

According to Falowski, engineers established three primary targets:
  • More horsepower
  • More torque
  • Better fuel economy
After determining those goals, the engineering team concluded a turbocharged engine offered the best path forward. The next question became what engine configuration would deliver those results.

Rather than developing another V8, Stellantis chose a 3.0-liter inline-six because it could meet power targets while also offering inherent balance advantages.

“In an inline six they’re perfectly balanced,” Falowski explained. “They’re smooth, they feel great whether you’re idling or racing all the way to redline.”

He also noted the smoother operation fit well with luxury-oriented trucks like the Ram 1500 Tungsten, where refinement is increasingly important to buyers.

Stellantis Says Turbo Reliability Concerns Are Based on Old Technology​

One of the biggest criticisms of the Hurricane engine has been its twin turbochargers.

Falowski acknowledged many consumers still view turbocharged engines as less reliable than naturally aspirated engines, but said that perception largely comes from earlier turbo applications where manufacturers simply bolted turbos onto engines that were never designed for boost.

The Hurricane, he said, was engineered from the beginning as a turbocharged engine.

Engineers modeled cylinder pressures, temperatures, cooling requirements and material specifications before production began. The same durability and design principles used for decades in turbocharged diesel engines were applied to the Hurricane gasoline engine.

Extreme Durability Testing Includes Simulating a Race Track​

Falowski provided new details on how Stellantis validates Hurricane durability.

Rather than simply accumulating miles, engineers use damage accumulation models that simulate the stress customers place on engines throughout their ownership experience. The company then creates accelerated tests that generate the same amount of wear in significantly less time.

One example involves running the engine at sustained high output for hundreds of hours, far beyond what most owners would ever experience.

Stellantis also uses a specialized gimbal-mounted dynamometer capable of tilting the engine to simulate extreme cornering conditions while monitoring oil flow.

The goal is to ensure the engine never experiences oil starvation even under aggressive driving conditions.

How Stellantis Solved a Common Turbo Problem​

Another interesting detail involved turbocharger cooling.

Falowski said the Hurricane uses a dedicated low-temperature cooling circuit that not only cools compressed intake air but also continues cooling the turbochargers after the engine is shut off.

The system uses an electric water pump to continue circulating coolant after shutdown when necessary.

According to Falowski, this helps prevent oil coking inside the turbochargers, which was a common failure point on older turbocharged engines.

Hurricane Oil Requirements and 10,000-Mile Oil Changes​

Perhaps the most controversial topic involved oil.

Falowski confirmed the Hurricane Standard Output engine uses 0W-20 full synthetic oil, while the High Output version requires 0W-40 because of its higher boost pressures and bearing loads.

He also defended the engine’s 10,000-mile oil change interval.

According to Falowski, modern synthetic oils and additive packages are dramatically more advanced than oils available even a decade ago. The Hurricane’s oil life monitoring system continuously evaluates engine operation and can request earlier service if the vehicle experiences severe use.

He went even further near the end of the interview, calling the 10,000-mile recommendation a conservative number.

“The 10,000 miles that we recommend, it’s a very safe number,” Falowski said.

No Dipstick? Stellantis Thinks That’s Better​

Another surprising revelation involved engine oil monitoring.

While many truck buyers dislike the disappearance of traditional dipsticks, Falowski said newer Stellantis vehicles, like the 2025 Ram 1500 with the Hurricane engine, use oil level sensors that continuously monitor oil levels. If the oil level falls below a specified threshold, the system alerts the driver immediately.

His argument is straightforward: most owners never checked their oil anyway.

By continuously monitoring oil levels electronically, Stellantis believes the system actually offers better protection than relying on drivers to remember periodic checks.

Bottom Line from the Ram Hurricane Engine Chief Engineer​

Whether Ram fans like it or not, the Hurricane wasn’t developed simply because someone wanted to kill the Hemi.

According to the engineer who helped develop both engines, the Hurricane program focused on delivering more power, more torque, improved fuel economy and greater refinement while meeting increasingly stringent global requirements.

The bigger challenge may not be convincing customers the Hurricane is capable. It may be convincing lifelong V8 owners that modern turbocharged technology, longer oil change intervals and electronic monitoring systems have evolved far beyond what they remember from decades ago.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/aut...&cvid=6a298fc672ef4ed98c0ccbbe7b4b636b&ei=144
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
3,648
Reaction score
7,613
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
The mental gymnastics in this thread are amazing. I especially like how weak and embarrassing the 5.7L is in the Rumble Bee thread but what a legendary powerhouse you're proud to own the 5.7L is in this thread.

Thankfully the Pentastar guys haven't found the thread yet.

The mental gymnastics are yours. You don't understand the use case difference between 0-60 performance, and duty cycle, so you can't follow the arguments being made in both threads and why the same engine works well one case and not the other. Not my problem.
 
OP
OP
Yardbird

Yardbird

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2022
Posts
1,158
Reaction score
2,700
Location
Western NC
Ram Year
2018
Engine
3.6
The mental gymnastics in this thread are amazing. I especially like how weak and embarrassing the 5.7L is in the Rumble Bee thread but what a legendary powerhouse you're proud to own the 5.7L is in this thread.

Thankfully the Pentastar guys haven't found the thread yet.

I'm a Pentastar guy, and I'm keeping my mouth shut.....

It gets me to and from where I want to go, I have a Dodge V-10 truck if I want to tow, The Pentastar gets good gas mileage, and hopefully it doesn't spit a cam. I expect an oil cooler sometime down the road, but I still have only 44k miles on mine.

I would like more low end torque, but am learning to live with higher rpms for power over low end torque like the V10.

You give up something for every choice you make.

One disatvantage of the Hurricane, it will be expensive to repair with all the wizz parts and other stuff hanging off it.

I looks at todays transition like in the early 70's when everything went low compression for emissions and the early 80's when everything went to smaller engines for gas mileage. Several years of less than stellar engines until the growing pains were worked out.

At least we could turn on the car radio without having to pay a fee for it.
 

GeauxinUp

Senior Member
Navy Badge
Joined
Feb 9, 2025
Posts
759
Reaction score
1,475
Location
Louisiana
Ram Year
2026 Limited
Engine
3.0L TT H.O.
Engine breaking is a real thing, which you'd know/appreciate if you towed. Going down mountains/grades with runaway ramps for big rigs, you appreciate every bit of stopping power from your engine. The cummins is legendary, but a big gasser does pretty well and much better than a small displacement engine.

Facts.
Funny that you assume to know how I use my truck. I thought that we were having a rational debate, but I’ve since realized that you’re the smartest guy in the room, and I’m just wasting mine and your time. Must be an engineer…carry on
 

GeauxinUp

Senior Member
Navy Badge
Joined
Feb 9, 2025
Posts
759
Reaction score
1,475
Location
Louisiana
Ram Year
2026 Limited
Engine
3.0L TT H.O.
The mental gymnastics in this thread are amazing. I especially like how weak and embarrassing the 5.7L is in the Rumble Bee thread but what a legendary powerhouse you're proud to own the 5.7L is in this thread.

Thankfully the Pentastar guys haven't found the thread yet.
Wild ain’t it!
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
Wild ain’t it!

Yeah, it is. The hemi is an unreliable PoS in any thread about hemi tick, all doomed to an early death by (insert: MDS, Poor Oiling, Heat Treatment issues, etc). In Hurricane threads the Hemi is so reliable the old Ford 300 I6 weeps with envy. The 5.7L is an outdated weak ass PoS that's embarrassed by any other modern truck, or it's the Mopar God's Gift To The Faithful.

Reminds me of all the people here saying "the gov't" was the reason Ram couldn't make a V8 any more. Ford and GM are under that same gov't and seemed to be able to. Now that they Hemi is back it's just Mopar was ran by stupid people doing stupid things. Well, yeah. Now they've got a product mix again. Still a poor one compared to the competition, but baby steps. Maybe get the Dakota out finally as the next step.
 

reno944t

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Posts
3
Reaction score
1
Location
07006
Ram Year
2009
Engine
5.7
The electric water pump that continues after shut down was introduced in my 1987 944 Turbo. It's not a new discovery! My friend that is a top mechanic for Dodge/Ram said their biggest failure is the plastic water pump which creates over heating issues. Multiple water pump failures at 30,000 and it's not your traditional 8 bolts and replace.
 

reno944t

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Posts
3
Reaction score
1
Location
07006
Ram Year
2009
Engine
5.7
Yeah, it is. The hemi is an unreliable PoS in any thread about hemi tick, all doomed to an early death by (insert: MDS, Poor Oiling, Heat Treatment issues, etc). In Hurricane threads the Hemi is so reliable the old Ford 300 I6 weeps with envy. The 5.7L is an outdated weak ass PoS that's embarrassed by any other modern truck, or it's the Mopar God's Gift To The Faithful.

Reminds me of all the people here saying "the gov't" was the reason Ram couldn't make a V8 any more. Ford and GM are under that same gov't and seemed to be able to. Now that they Hemi is back it's just Mopar was ran by stupid people doing stupid things. Well, yeah. Now they've got a product mix again. Still a poor one compared to the competition, but baby steps. Maybe get the Dakota out finally as the next step.
I went 325,000 miles on my 2009 1500 before a dropped valve. I was religious on doing 5,000 mile oil change intervals and had over 11,000 hours of run time. I had the Hemi tick since day one but the engine lasted. Ford motors are garbage as is GMC
 

MrBonez

Senior Member
Joined
May 29, 2025
Posts
224
Reaction score
451
Location
Central Alabama
Ram Year
2008 Laramie Quad Cab
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Awww maybe U buy and U get a bag of jelly beans.

The 27s would be a thought if they didn’t have that new Atlantic electrical fiasco.

GM allegedly bringing back the 350 motor is. The 5.7 without their catastrophic AFM/DFM System. Might be worth a look.

U just Neva know.
As long as they don't bring back the L87 "Rod Launcher Edition" (Largely 90's makes of it) , that should at least be something to look at.
I'm still amazed just HOW they could take a time-proven design with decades of life behind it and screw it all up but hey - L87's were engineered too..... Right?
 

turkeybird56

Military Vet 1976-1996 Retired US Army
Air Force Army Law Enforcement
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
25,801
Reaction score
56,558
Location
Central Texas
Ram Year
2019 Bighorn, 4 X 4, 3.21 rear, Bright Flame Red Pearl Coat, Mopar tonneau cover,Westin Bed rug
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I don’t know all the L number series for the Chevy motors. I still know by number by 350/327 etc. They bring back to 350 and ditch the AFM/DFM and the other junk they put in there. It might be a dang good engine again but still you got that clunky 10 speed behind it who knows. GM not exactly winning any awards with that POS tranny either.
 
Last edited:

ramffml

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
3,648
Reaction score
7,613
Location
ramforum
Ram Year
2019
Engine
hemi 5.7
I don’t know all the L number series for the Chevy motors. I still known by number by 350/327 etc. They bring back to 350 and ditch the AFM/DFM and the other junk they put in there. It might be a dang good engine again but still you got that clunky 10 speed behind it who knows. GM not exactly winning any awards with that POS tranny either.

Rumour (emphasis on rumour) is that they're getting a 5.7 that puts out numbers like the SO (420 hp) and a 6.6 that puts out numbers like the HO (460 to 535 hp).

If they can fix their 10 speed, and put in a pair of seats that are an upgrade from cardboard over wooden church pews, I might be all over that if/when my truck decides to leave the chat.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
As long as they don't bring back the L87 "Rod Launcher Edition" (Largely 90's makes of it) , that should at least be something to look at.
I'm still amazed just HOW they could take a time-proven design with decades of life behind it and screw it all up but hey - L87's were engineered too..... Right?

The 5.3L is probably their best modern option. The 6.2L if they can stop buying crankshafts from sub-Saharan African villages making them from recycled teapots and machining the finish with left handed potato peelers.
 

Gemeni06

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Posts
79
Reaction score
102
Location
Northern Adirondacks
Ram Year
2013
Engine
4.7 Liter Flex Fuel V8
It is part of Engineer training, I have a brother-in-law that is very capable with that particular skill!
Engineers aren't just geeks. They are also hardcore businessmen. So his analysis is part geek and part business.
 

Ramit355

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Posts
683
Reaction score
517
Location
Minford Ohio
Ram Year
2025 Tungsden 4WD
Engine
Hurrican H.O.
Its always about the money. I hav
So, the Hemi is considered an "upgrade"?

I thought the Hurricane was supposed to be the upgrade.

Oh, I get it. Sales aren't great, and you figured out you screwed the pooch when you dropped the Hemi.

So, you brought the Hemi back, so you can charge more for it.
I bought and traded for the Hurricane HO, but I dont agree its better or an upgrade from the 5.7's I have had. The 5.7 is a very great motor and the ones who pay for the trucks made it clear with the omighty dollar they want the 5.7. That said I think key word mentioned by the designer was GLOBAL demand. The manufacture wanted more money at a GLOBAL level forgetting their core buyers who loves the 5.7 no matter which one they thought was the best. Money talks and in this case it spoke up.
 

Jayden7h

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2026
Posts
7
Reaction score
7
Location
LA
Ram Year
2022
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I get why Ram moved to the Hurricane on paper: more power, more torque, better mpg, smoother engine. That part makes sense.

What doesn’t sit right with me is the “most owners never checked their oil anyway” mindset. A sensor is fine as an added safeguard, but it shouldn’t replace a simple manual way to verify oil level. A lot of us actually do check fluids, especially on a turbo engine where oil condition and level matter even more long term.

If they wanted people to trust the new platform faster, keeping a dipstick would have gone a long way.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4





A new Dakota has been coming next year for years. I hope so, but I'll believe it when it is on lots.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
211,263
Posts
3,064,215
Members
171,519
Latest member
Glowz
Back
Top