Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Who has experienced it at low altitude?
"Feature" is what Ram called it.
The speed bumps in texas wouldn't trigger it.
1. Go to RV.Net, there have been multiple posters that have experienced it at lower altitudes. I distinctly remember one stating that it kicked in on him going onto the foothills of the Appalachians in Tennessee where it was still below 1,200 ft elevation.
2. Ram marketing probably also calls traction control and torque management a "feature" for those who drink the Kool-Aide, but does that mean they are "features" to all buyers? No.
3. Yes, there are mountains in west Texas and I would be willing to bet some roads like State Highway 118(6,138 ft) going into the Davis Mountains would trigger it. Although, I said what I said as a jab back at what Skrap's post meant for me. I don't see you going after Skrap or Thevikings posts that you know aren't true yet you say mine isn't? Double standard?
I experienced it at 18,500 combined weight climbing into the Bighorns. Nasty hairpin turns with 25mph limits. I would accelerate out of the turns, the truck would shift into 2nd, then I'd have to slow down for the next. Finally after the constant shifting and 10+% grade the 'feature" kicked in. Oil and Trans temps dropped. They were never in the red, or even 3/4 on the gauges, but that shows some reasoning behind it. I ended up cruising to the top at about 32 once it straightened out a bit. Up and over the steepest parts 20-35% grades at 32. About 6 miles total before it let me out of 1st. Climbed another 1,000' after that. It just wasn't as steep or twisty. A total of 4300' gained in 16 miles. Ike Gauntlet gains 2300' in 8.5 miles, but no hairpins. Just really damn high and pretty steep.
The next day my father came up at 19,480 combined with his tuned cummins 4.10 DRW. Of course no hold feature and he manually held 3rd. He made better time for sure, but was also limited by the hairpins and was watching his EGT and trans temps pretty close. It is a hell of a climb with 11k of camper behind this hemi.
On the way out, at the top there is a turnout that all vehicles towing a trailer must turn out and do a brake check. A little ways down the road a lighted sign telling motorists to use a lower gear the stating the number of fatalities on the pass the previous year, if i rember it was 7. So I went down the exact same way I went up, in 1st gear. I only had to hit the brakes to slow for the hairpins. Worked well.
Cummins defiantly was better for that situation. However, 95% of our truck's driving is empty with my wife hauling the kids all over creation. Camper has been parked for 2.5 months now as our 6months of winter has set in. Feels more like 9.
Davis max's out at 10% and only 6,000'. No hair pins. Average from FT. DAVIS to the observatory is 2% and 1400' gained in 15 miles.
In the end, I am the 6.4L hater when all I was doing in the first place was debating wrong information that was posted or responding to posts trying to get their jabs in like the one posted earlier by Skrap or the one by Theviking in that last thread. But hey, I am the evil one that starts crap, right?
How dare you say the "C" word is a smarter decision over a 6.4L in any situation. It is 6.4 or nothing because you don't "need" a Cummins. Your opinion and what you think doesn't matter. Do that again mister and you are out of the He-man Cummins Haters Club.
SouthTexan, you distort the facts more than Hillary in a Benghazi hearing. Let me refresh your memory, again, about what started the 4500 post shenanigans.
You were busting chops, I took it has humor and busted your balls in return. To which you got all emotional over everyone picking on you, again....
So, once again, man up and stop acting like everyone is just picking on you. Maybe you just need to switch beers or something. No more Blue Moon
Aren't you the one that got mad at me for talking about Ecoboost motors in a thread about Hemi's? Yet you bring up an Ecoboost motor in a Hemi thread? Huh???
Although if you want to turn this into an Ecoboost thread then I'll be your huckleberry! Just say when.
To direct some heat off of SouthTexan for a brief second, the one issue I have with any gas engine is tuning. I miss the ease of making big power gains through a tuner in a diesel. Yes custom tunes help with a gasser but you need a lot more supporting mods to build a good amount of extra hp/torque.
It's not necessarily a turbo thing. Additional fuel is needed and the ability to change settings on the fly with a tuner on a diesel is niceThat's a turbo thing, not diesel. A naturally aspirated diesel is gutless. I owned a 1986 GMC Sierra with a 6.2 NA diesel.
It's not necessarily a turbo thing. Additional fuel is needed and the ability to change settings on the fly with a tuner on a diesel is nice
This^Personally I have neither, but these arguments are kind of useless. Each motor has its place in the market, that's why they offer both. If they were meant to compete that wouldn't make sense. IMO if your towing heavy on a regular occurrence then you need a diesel hands down. If your the weekend warrior who tows mainly smaller loads and the occasional big load than the gasser will do fine.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not necessarily a turbo thing. Additional fuel is needed and the ability to change settings on the fly with a tuner on a diesel is nice