THETANK
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Posts
- 2,196
- Reaction score
- 657
- Location
- up jor *** mang
- Ram Year
- 2015 R/T
- Engine
- 5.7L Hemi
I don't want to fire up this argument again, so I will try to keep this short. We have run a few trucks on the dyno and seen as much as an 18hp/tq gain from the Vararam over stock, and even saw a 16hp/tq gain over the LMI short ram intake. We also tested 4 intakes on the same night at the dragstrip on a 2012 crew cab...only mod on this truck was our 85mm throttle body (stock tuning). Stock intake it ran 15.2. With K&N 63 series, it ran a 15.1. With the S&B w/o scoop, it ran a 14.9. And with Vararam, it ran a 14.8. Any mod that knocks .4 off your 1/4 mile time for only $300 is a bargain.
Not all intakes are created equal, so to say that all intakes are just noise makers is wrong. That's like saying all headers are junk because you only gained 8hp with your shorties. Many guys have picked up 25-30hp/tq on the dyno from longtubes.
We all have different goals, wants, and needs from our trucks...how much power do you want to make? That question will determine which route you should go with your mods.
There's nothing wrong with scratching the itch with a cheaper mod, but I learned long ago that those cheaper mods usually end up coming off and getting replaced with better mods down the road (thus costing you more money in the long run). That is why I say to hold off until you can afford the better part, regardless of which mod it is that you want.
have not come across any arguments for/against the Vararam yet but my question is this, at our track my first run would see ambient temps of approx 25C and by the 4th run the temps will have dropped by as much as 10C (fresh mountain air). Could this scenario come into play ie lower temps equals faster 1/4er's