2014 power wagon payload

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

audio1der

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Posts
5,300
Reaction score
1,104
Location
Airdrie, Alberta
Ram Year
2012
Engine
Hemi 5.7
On a floating axle (2500/3500) the extra set of bearings taking the payload's load would get a real workout if over capacity. non?
Coils would def be first to go tho- agreed.
 

loveracing1988

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Posts
3,505
Reaction score
913
Location
Clarkston, MI
Ram Year
2020
Engine
6.7 Cummins
On a floating axle (2500/3500) the extra set of bearings taking the payload's load would get a real workout if over capacity. non?
Coils would def be first to go tho- agreed.

The axles can take the capacity of a 3500 truck.
 

TRCM

USN, Retired
Military
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Posts
3,238
Reaction score
5,359
Location
Newport News, VA
Ram Year
2012 1500 Laramie CC 4x4
Engine
5.7 Hemi
All the things mentioned will make the suspension stronger and/or last longer.

But even if you put a semi truck suspension under it, it will still only have a 1350 lb or so payload, because that was the way it was built.

IN the end, all the what if's and such won't matter, legally, it is what it is.

The ONLY way to increase those numbers legally, is to build it, then have it recertified by an independent activity...and trust me, you could buy a couple of loaded 3500 dually's for what that would cost.

I looked at doing this to try and get the truck in my avatar, which started life as a Ramcharger, titled as a pickup truck (since in VA it is considered a station wagon since a load can not be stacked higher than the top of the cab when stock).....the cost was over 6 figures, and that was just an estimate.
 

tommy_harrell

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Posts
31
Reaction score
3
Ram Year
2014
Engine
6.4
I always figured the gvwr was set by the limits of the weakest link. Power wagon has smaller lighter duty tires than a non-power wagon (285/70r17 8ply load range D vs 275/70r18 10ply load range E) and softer springs.

Payload and towing capacity are what put me into an outdoorsman over a powerwagon
 

loveracing1988

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Posts
3,505
Reaction score
913
Location
Clarkston, MI
Ram Year
2020
Engine
6.7 Cummins
I always figured the gvwr was set by the limits of the weakest link. Power wagon has smaller lighter duty tires than a non-power wagon (285/70r17 8ply load range D vs 275/70r18 10ply load range E) and softer springs.

Payload and towing capacity are what put me into an outdoorsman over a powerwagon

The load capacity of P rated tires on the 1500's is well over the trucks rated capacity. That doesn't mean you should ever try it but still... I'm sure those load range D tires are rated for 3000 pounds or so per tire. I would bet the added height and the softer Springs are the big things at play here. The higher the truck is the more sway you get, and the softer the springs the more sway. Kind of a 1 2 punch.
 
OP
OP
K

Kbhowe1

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Posts
33
Reaction score
13
Location
NM
Ram Year
2014
Engine
6.4
Yeah the tires are rated at 3100 lbs, and there are 3 guys at my office that run D rated tires on their 2500 and 3500 trucks and have never had a problem.

Put those timbren in today and wanted to show a pic. So far unloaded no change in ride at all, but probably won't have a load in it till next weekend to report on.

Both pis are of the drivers side.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    92.8 KB · Views: 103
OP
OP
K

Kbhowe1

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Posts
33
Reaction score
13
Location
NM
Ram Year
2014
Engine
6.4
Other pic
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 121
Top