engine cfm rate...

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Been thinking of getting Moes ported intake manifold if and when they become available. Been doing some base calculations of present cfm usage. Looking for someone to chime in for some comparisons. My engines intake uses on average at wot 311g/s. 311x4=1244gt/s 1244x60=74640qt/min. 7464/ 29.92= 2494.65 cfm.


This formula doesn't seem right. That's way too much cfm. Any help would be appreciated.

Might help if I had tbe right unit of measurement!

Found this formula on the ls1 forum.

28316.8 cm*3/ft*3
.00129 grams/cm*3


28316x.00129 = 36.53gram/ft*3

311grams/sec x60sec/min = 18660gr/min
18660gr/min / 36.53 = 510.8 cfm.
 
Last edited:

jsteinm1

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Posts
399
Reaction score
97
Location
Nebraska
Ram Year
2014 Ram 1500 Sport CC
Engine
HEMI 5.7L
Displacement is 345ci = 0.200ft^3
At 5000RPM, the engine is displacing 345ci*5000RPM/2 (takes 2 revolutions to complete a cycle)
0.200ft^3*(5000/2)min^-1=500cfm

Thats a rough calculation, actual would be a little less since the cylinders aren't scavenged 100% each time.
 
Last edited:

charonblk07

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Posts
4,056
Reaction score
2,088
Location
Calgary, Ab
Ram Year
2009
Engine
F1-A forged 349ci
You're right, that's way off.

The 2 calculations I use are:

CFM = ((g/s /1225)*60)*35.31 or
CFM = (CID*RPM*VE)/3456

That gives you 537 CFM with the first and with a rpm of 5800 and VE of 80% gives 468 CFM with the second.

I like the second better because it does take the Volumetric Efficiency into account and allows a variation based on rpm. Hehe, my engine moves 1189cfm
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
You're right, that's way off.

The 2 calculations I use are:

CFM = ((g/s /1225)*60)*35.31 or
CFM = (CID*RPM*VE)/3456

That gives you 537 CFM with the first and with a rpm of 5800 and VE of 80% gives 468 CFM with the second.

I like the second better because it does take the Volumetric Efficiency into account and allows a variation based on rpm. Hehe, my engine moves 1189cfm

So, if the intake volume of the 5.7 is roughly 675 cfm at 5500.
Displacement x rpm /2 and my engine is using roughly 510cfm then the VE is around
93?

Using your formula for 311g/s gives me 542.43 cfm with a VE of .98791.
But 542.43cfm is still only 80.36% of the engine capabilities of 675cfm @5500. Is this the true VE and .9879 really P-ratio?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top