HEMIMANN
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
- Posts
- 9,610
- Reaction score
- 25,245
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN
- Ram Year
- 2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
- Engine
- 6.4L HEMI
Automobile manufacturers don't use catch cans for multiple reasons
-Carbon buildup from PCV blow-by is usually a long-term issue, not a “during warranty” issue. Just like them using many plastic internal parts for the engines now. Thats obviously a cost saving move also not a longevity one which brings me to the next point...
-cost savings, lower production cost
-Another thing that the EPA will want to regulate
-Typical consumer does not want to check their catch can and in some cases they need to be checked more often than every oil change
Now imagine:
Guess who gets blamed? The car company.
- Someone never checks it
- It fills with sludge
- Freezes in winter
- Blocks PCV flow
- Blows out seals
Manufacturers design cars for people who:
- Never open the hood
- Skip maintenance
- Ignore warning lights
A catch can adds owner responsibility, and that’s liability.
They absolutely could, Nick. But they won't spend the money to make it maintenance-free, unlike the more expensive stuff from Racor-Parker for big diesels that has the drain back to the crankcase from the coalescer.
In fact, Mazda has done exactly this. I haven't researched how effective it is, but at least they put a coalescer in their GDI turbo engine. It's in the schematics, you can look it up.
