Pic request: Bilstein 5100's at 2.1 With 27560r20's

[Throwin Plugs]

I'm thinking of leveling my truck, im still running factory sized tires (albeit grabber ATX'S) and im reading that a 2.1 setting on the bilsteins should get me what im looking for with out having to put rear spacers in. Can anyone post a pic of what that might look like? I appreciate it.

 

[crazykid1994]

I'm thinking of leveling my truck, im still running factory sized tires (albeit grabber ATX'S) and im reading that a 2.1 setting on the bilsteins should get me what im looking for with out having to put rear spacers in. Can anyone post a pic of what that might look like? I appreciate it.

Old pic. 2.1 with 275/60r20 AT tires.

 

[Donn]

Here's mine with factory sizing.

Pre-Front Lift Measurments:
Driver Front - 36 1/2
Passenger Front - 36 1/2

Driver Rear - 39
Passenger Rear - 39

Post Front Lift Measurements:
Drivers Front - 38 1/2
Passenger Front - 39

Drivers Rear - 38 1/2
Passenger Rear - 39

 

[ram1500rsm]

This was mine 3 years ago stock with Rancho QL struts. I also did Zone UCAs at the same time.

 

[Burla]

There is some noticeable rake in it at 2.1, but unnoticeable rake at 2.8, I had both. I like the ride better at 2.8, but 2.1 is safer for suspension parts, yes that little difference makes a lot of difference in travel. Blew a cv boot at 2.8, but I don't really know what happened. When I get around to it I'll probably go back to 2.8. I do believe you might want new UCA's at either height with your year. I went down from 20's to 17's, just wanted more tire.

 

[BriamH]

Bilstein's @ 2.1" with 285/70/R17

 

[MoparFin]

2.5” front/2” rear MotoFab spacers with 275/65r20s.