API Comp Cam VVT 266

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

whiteram1500

Junior Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Posts
18
Reaction score
7
Location
Tucson AZ
Ram Year
2012
Engine
5.7 hemi
nice runs man once you can get it to hook that thing is going to be a beast
 

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
I wonder what it would do in 4hi. Alot of guys on this forum put it in 4hi when there drag racing to get all the traction they can get
 

bouf0010

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Posts
430
Reaction score
89
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
4 auto would be the way to do it, 4x4 to hook up and itll drop back into 2wd once theres no spin.

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk
 

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
Looks like about 5000+ with install and tuning. Its a nice option. But ripps supercharger is about 500 dollars cheaper and it will make more power. But its nice to have the head and cam option now.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Looks like about 5000+ with install and tuning. Its a nice option. But ripps supercharger is about 500 dollars cheaper and it will make more power. But its nice to have the head and cam option now.


The package is $3000, tune is included. Your local shop could do the install. It's about 14 hours. The problem for me on my next mod is there's nothing available for the '13. I'd love to stroke and forge the bottom end and put a whipple on top, then the transmission has to be upgraded, but I want to put 4.56 gears in first. That's going to be around $5000.00 I'm sure. Working progress, stage by stage. The Cam package is the cheaper option considering the bottom and tranny don't need to be upgraded to handle your investment.
 

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
I see you have the 266 cam. Was there more involved for the bigger cams. And why did you choose this one. Is there better every day drivability. And it looks like 5000+ till you give them back the cores?
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I see you have the 266 cam. Was there more involved for the bigger cams. And why did you choose this one. Is there better every day drivability. And it looks like 5000+ till you give them back the cores?
The MMPG Team.

1. Why Can’t I get that old school Lope?

Old school lope is achieved by overlap. Overlap is the time the intake and exhaust are both open. This can be achieved but not without sacrifice. The larger cams such as the 274 Comp have an aggressive idle but are way too large for a 5.7 displacement engine. Low end throttle response and power will be sacrificed. The smaller cams can get a bit more aggressive idle if lobe separation is tightened to 112 from 114 but will be much harder to tune and still may have some bad driving habits. The VVT style lobes are not a symmetrical design and have a delayed intake opening so they can be advanced in the engine but this reduces overlap.

2. Why do they only make power past 3k Rpms?

We are working on this with some custom lobes at this time but here is the problem. The 5.7 VVT engine as we know has a considerably good head and ports as large as the 6.1. Well with the large port as compared to the old 5.7 head it is hard to increase the low power numbers. Also the factory cams are so small that they inherently make allot of low end power. If we are able to maintain or slightly increase the power below 2800RPM with the larger cam we are doing good.

3. What or Why is the Limiter used for?
Cam phasers in factory engines are used for emissions and fuel economy. They sweep the small factory cam up to 35 degrees to achieve this. When using larger performance cam this must be limited to make sure we do not have piston to valve issues. Even the amount we limit to (about half 17 degree) is too much to move a cam for performance.

4. What can I do to make the most low end torque
The best way to achieve the low end torque is efficiency. I like the best exhaust (long tube header and HF cat) I can find and then make a custom cam to compliment it.

5. Why are some cams losing power in the lower RPMs but show gains in the higher
Refer back to #2. In addition people are choosing cams that are way too big for the 5.7 engines. We have been working on these Hemis since 2005 and although the head has changed (gotten better but larger) what makes people think they can run a 226 or a 222 intake lobe at .050 lift in a 5.7L engine is beyond me. Some of the best running older 5.7s have 214Spartan cams. Also if you look at the cam timing numbers on the larger cams they retard the cams (which hurts low end power) just to make them fit. As previously stated the VVT came profile is non symmetrical and the advertised or @50 number is a bit deceiving. To compare to a normal or more traditional cams you have to add a couple degrees duration.


6. What is the best package to do to get the most out of it. IE Converter, long tubes ect….
It is all about budget and packaging. Ideally long tubes, 3400-3600 converter, 214 or a 218 @50 cam (intake lobe) with correct exh and install timing numbers.

As long as we plan ahead we can pick the right cam or other package parts. If you have to work in stages then you may make some sacrifices till you have time and money to get it all done.

7. Why not just use a 392 OEM Cam? Or your opinion on why not to?
A 392 cam is allot of cam for the money but it is still a factory cam. It is ground on a 121 LSA as opposed to a 114 LSA of a custom cam. It will have an even smoother idle and will give up more TQ below peak torque than a 114LSA cam. The cam install is also later than the custom cam also sacrificing that precious torque we need for these 4000lb carsicon1.png. Another thing to consider is the install cost, valve spring upgrade, tuning etc. that remains the same no matter what cam you install so why not get the most out of it.


there are 3 off the shelf cams by comp 266, 270, 274. You could have a custom grid made for your set up. I went with the 266(LSA114) because of the intake duration of 218 and makes power starting @1800rpm to 6800. it is a good choice with this truck off the shelf. The Eagle heads flow really nice( I have posted these numbers on another thread and I bumped it for you) but I needed to upgrade the valve springs and such so I went with the ported, big valves for even more flow. You can use stock springs also with this cam( be careful because the lift is ( .612, .605) and you don't need the heads but to take advantage of that lift over stock, you will want ported heads for even more flow. So, in reality no heads needed, no springs, nor do the heads have to come off. cutting your cost further. Cam, limiter and tune then upgrade step by step from there.
 
Last edited:

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
So what are these cams making by themselves. 30hp with tuning?
 

Heywood

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2013
Posts
664
Reaction score
195
Location
Alberta Can.
Ram Year
2010 Sport
Engine
5.7
Nice thread post.

Another reason why I won't go to the 392 in my car.
6.1 has no VVT and no MDS. Much easier and cheaper to build.

The 5.7 and 6.4 (392) are so close that it's stupid money to get around the cam.
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
So what are these cams making by themselves. 30hp with tuning?


I don't know really but from what I do know it would really depend on your exhaust system. The more efficient, the more power made. Even if only 30HP/TQ, those gains are made with half the money of a set of ARH 30hp/30tq @ $1500. The more your mods work together, the better the gains for sure.
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Nice thread post.

Another reason why I won't go to the 392 in my car.
6.1 has no VVT and no MDS. Much easier and cheaper to build.

The 5.7 and 6.4 (392) are so close that it's stupid money to get around the cam.


The good thing is the 5.7 doesn't require you to swap the MDS lifters, push rods, springs, etc. like the 392 does.
 

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
I don't know really but from what I do know it would really don your exhaust system. The more efficient, the more power. Even if only 30HP/TQ, those gains are made with half the money of a set of ARH 30hp/30tq @ $1500. The more your mods work together, the better the gains for sure.

Nice to know. I never know I might add a cam later in the future. Maybe after a couple more years. Im going to take a hit on longtubes this year from stainless works. At least my truck would be ready for a cam with all the breathing it will have.
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
Sounds like a perfect plan. Stage by stage. I took 8 before videos of acceleration before my truck went into Arringtons. Night and day difference. When your ready a Cam really makes a big difference.
 

dusterman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Posts
137
Reaction score
11
Ram Year
2012 express reg cab
Engine
5.7
Sounds like a perfect plan. Stage by stage. I took 8 before videos of acceleration before my truck went into Arringtons. Night and day difference. When your ready a Cam really makes a big difference.

And have one hell of a sound to it...:biggun:
 

C3ntury

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2012
Posts
248
Reaction score
54
Ram Year
2009 Ram 1500 CC Sport
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I don't know really but from what I do know it would really depend on your exhaust system. The more efficient, the more power made. Even if only 30HP/TQ, those gains are made with half the money of a set of ARH 30hp/30tq @ $1500. The more your mods work together, the better the gains for sure.

With that being said, would the usual 1 3/4 headers to 2.5 exhaust still recommended or must you increase to 1 7/8 headers and 3" exhaust to let it breathe like most do in boosting?
 
OP
OP
Hemi_Express2013

Hemi_Express2013

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Posts
728
Reaction score
375
Location
Nantucket, Ma
Ram Year
2013
Engine
Hemi 5.7
With that being said, would the usual 1 3/4 headers to 2.5 exhaust still recommended or must you increase to 1 7/8 headers and 3" exhaust to let it breathe like most do in boosting?


Personally, stick with the 1 3/4 primaries and 2.5 exhaust. That set up will give you more low end TQ.
 

greychevy

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Posts
669
Reaction score
118
Location
Orlando, FL
Ram Year
2012
Engine
Hemi
The good thing is the 5.7 doesn't require you to swap the MDS lifters, push rods, springs, etc. like the 392 does.

You don't have to replace the springs on the 5.7 when going a cam swap?

Personally, stick with the 1 3/4 primaries and 2.5 exhaust. That set up will give you more low end TQ.

I have a stock cam but that's the set up I went with and would stay with even after doing a cam swap.
 
Top