How bad do the 20" tires hurt performance?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Dale_K

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Posts
81
Reaction score
14
Ram Year
2012
Engine
5.7
I like the 20" wheels and tires on my 2012 Express regular cab but the truck seems kind of slow for 390 hp. I've had this same motor in a 300 and a Challenger and those were both fast. I realize the Ram is about 500 lbs heavier but it feels slow even accounting for the weight. Are the 20" tires killing the performance?
 

1500ram12

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Posts
5,487
Reaction score
2,432
Ram Year
2005
Engine
5.9L Cummins
I don't think it's the wheel/tire combo. Gear ratio and the newish transmission plus the torque management system have a big factor on how you "feel" the power. My wife has a 2011 grand Cherokee w/the 6 cyl and it feels like it has more get up and go then my truck does.

Sent from DROID RAZR MAXX using Tapatalk
 

GhostRam94

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Posts
6,486
Reaction score
174
Location
Hunstville, Texas
Ram Year
2009 Laramie CC
Engine
5.7 HEMI
Yeah the big thing is the torque management, I disable all mine with my dsp and it's like a whole new truck
 

Hemi450hp

Moe's Performance
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Posts
9,421
Reaction score
4,709
Location
Conroe, TX
Ram Year
2014 Ram 1500
Engine
Whipple Supercharged 422" Hemi
The tires do hurt performance big time. Even in my 7000lb diesel, the difference in performance from 35" tires to 37" tires is huge. It literally feels like a completely different truck performance wise.

Same applies to the hemi trucks. My 03 on 22's with 30" tires compared to the 17" drag radials that were only 28" tall was a night and day difference.

The shorter diameter not only increases your gear ratio, but the weight loss plays a big part as well.
 

fastNugly

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
349
Location
Toronto, ON
Ram Year
2012 Dodge Ram Sport CC
Engine
Hemi 5.7
The tires do hurt performance big time. Even in my 7000lb diesel, the difference in performance from 35" tires to 37" tires is huge. It literally feels like a completely different truck performance wise.

Same applies to the hemi trucks. My 03 on 22's with 30" tires compared to the 17" drag radials that were only 28" tall was a night and day difference.

The shorter diameter not only increases your gear ratio, but the weight loss plays a big part as well.

Whats your take on AT vs MT in the same tire diameter?

ie: 35" AT vs 35" MT
 

Budakane

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Posts
1,720
Reaction score
196
Location
Northern VA
Ram Year
2007
Engine
345ci Hemi
Amen brother!!!
The tires do hurt performance big time. Even in my 7000lb diesel, the difference in performance from 35" tires to 37" tires is huge. It literally feels like a completely different truck performance wise.

Same applies to the hemi trucks. My 03 on 22's with 30" tires compared to the 17" drag radials that were only 28" tall was a night and day difference.

The shorter diameter not only increases your gear ratio, but the weight loss plays a big part as well.
 

Birddog

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Posts
2,472
Reaction score
894
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
Ram Year
2016 Bright White 3500 Laramie 4X4 Long Bed
Engine
6.7 Cummins TD, 3.73
I don't know "how much" but a larger wheels can hurt performance. The two biggest performance killers are heat and weight. That's why your truck runs so much better on a cold day and why NOS improves performance (besides the chemicals in it that increase combustion). If you loaded your truck with a pallet of grass you'd slow down.
Your wheels have rotational weight. Rotational weight removed improves better than just removing weight. Thats why expensive racing wheels are light weight. That's also why race cars have light weight pillows. No one on this thread has has given incorrect info but to answer your original question

Yes, the 20's will be slower than 15's unless the 15's weigh more than the 20's of course.
 

Hemi450hp

Moe's Performance
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Posts
9,421
Reaction score
4,709
Location
Conroe, TX
Ram Year
2014 Ram 1500
Engine
Whipple Supercharged 422" Hemi
Whats your take on AT vs MT in the same tire diameter?

ie: 35" AT vs 35" MT

From a performance standpoint, whichever is heavier will be slower. Traction is also something to consider with an aggressive MT tire, but if you launch in 4wd, even that wont be a factor. My 07 cummins could not spin the tires in 4wd with Toyo MT's and over 1000rwtq.
 

Hemi450hp

Moe's Performance
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Posts
9,421
Reaction score
4,709
Location
Conroe, TX
Ram Year
2014 Ram 1500
Engine
Whipple Supercharged 422" Hemi
If you are looking for an allaround beast of a toy with more uses than just going down the dragstrip, its hard to beat a 4wd 5.9 cummins. If you dont need 4 doors, then grab a RC/LB 4wd...06-07. With a bigger turbo, some fuel, and efi live, that truck will run low 12's all day long.
 

1500ram12

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Posts
5,487
Reaction score
2,432
Ram Year
2005
Engine
5.9L Cummins
I started a thread on tire weight. Just search tire weight chart. I have most popular tires and all sizes. Still need to add more. Just haven't had time to finish

Sent from DROID RAZR MAXX using Tapatalk
 

fastNugly

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Posts
4,603
Reaction score
349
Location
Toronto, ON
Ram Year
2012 Dodge Ram Sport CC
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I started a thread on tire weight. Just search tire weight chart. I have most popular tires and all sizes. Still need to add more. Just haven't had time to finish

Sent from DROID RAZR MAXX using Tapatalk

Great info!
Just saw it

Got any on Nitto Terra and Toyo AT?
 

guntoter

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Posts
9
Reaction score
1
Location
Central Illinois
Ram Year
2012
Engine
Hemi 5.7
I guess some would consider the Hemi acceleration "sluggish" in the Ram, but in my opinion this truck is like having a race car. I had some fairly fast cars in the distant past (89 IROC Z 350, 81 Corvette) but they are all dogs compared this truck. Of course we traded in a 2004 Durango with the 4.7 so I haven't had a very high performance vehicle for awhile either.

If the traction and torque control are whats holding the Hemi back then I would be a bit afraid to run it ********. I would think the back end would break loose and spin you around if you get on it at low speeds in a turn. This engine is loaded with power.
 

Big Boi

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Posts
2,314
Reaction score
180
Location
S. Fla
Ram Year
2009
Engine
Hemi 5.7L
It is trq management, as well as not being able to COMPLETELY dissable traction control, I mean the 33 inch tires don't help by any means, but it isn't a huge factor. Wheel weight is thought to make a huge difference but even then the biggest factor is Diameter. Getting shorter tires will help, say 31s or something like that, but the biggest problem is not having a tuner to turn trq management off as well as traction control. Also the 390hp is to the crank, not to the wheels. With drive train loss we are looking around 310 to the wheels on a good day in a stock truck. Which even then should break the tires loose. That would be if there were no restrictions. I mean think about how little HP muscle cars of the 60s-70s had compared to todays standards and how easy it was to lay some rubber down. Those were the good days of not having a compootinator drive for you.

I thought you could disable the TC by pulling the ABS fuse...
2010 Dodge Ram Hemi burnout - YouTube
 

TRCM

USN, Retired
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Posts
3,238
Reaction score
5,366
Location
Newport News, VA
Ram Year
2012 1500 Laramie CC 4x4
Engine
5.7 Hemi
I guess some would consider the Hemi acceleration "sluggish" in the Ram, but in my opinion this truck is like having a race car. I had some fairly fast cars in the distant past (89 IROC Z 350, 81 Corvette) but they are all dogs compared this truck. Of course we traded in a 2004 Durango with the 4.7 so I haven't had a very high performance vehicle for awhile either.

If the traction and torque control are whats holding the Hemi back then I would be a bit afraid to run it ********. I would think the back end would break loose and spin you around if you get on it at low speeds in a turn. This engine is loaded with power.


If you thought those cars were fast, you'd drop a load when you drove some of the ones out these days. Those cars were ok, but not some of the better examples of that era.
 
Back
Top