Wow! you are one arrogant mother! Just out of curiousity, are you in your 20's cause I picture you as a young punk. No offense to the 20 yr. olds. I was a big time trouble maker/a!@ hole when i was that age. Im not saying tex is.
Sooooo let me get this straight. You asked me a question about the new diesels and I answered that question. Then you posted some false and misguided information based on your assumptions. I then told you that those assumptions were incorrect. You again asked for examples to back up what I said while saying that diesels are "not as I think". I then provided you with examples which proved your assumptions wrong that you were so addement that they were correct. Now you are saying I am an "arrogant mother", an @$$hole, and that I am way younger then I actually am all because you are now butt hurt that I proved the assumptons you had wrong that you should not have made in the first place.

Is that the jist of it or am I looking at this wrong?
BTW, it has been many moons and many seasons since I was in my 20s.
But, Im referring to everything you have posted about in this forum. I went through and was looking at some of your other posts. You just CAN NOT be wrong! You also HAVE to have the last word when there is a topic you are discussing and you dont like it.
I can and have been wrong before. I will even man up and admit if I was wrong and some one proved it. I don't just go by people's heresay. Although, unlike you did here, I don't step into things I don't know about or have no experience on. I will even even tell others if I do not know like I did with you here.....
"I don't know about that much weight for a 6.4L, but hopefully there is someone with a 6.4L that has pulled that much with an RV to help you out. "
http://www.ramforum.com/f158/most_weight_youve_pulled_your_6_4_a-67048/
and with another person here......
"I am not familiar with the EGR system on the 6.4L to comment, and cannot find enough info about it to give an educated answer."
http://www.ramforum.com/f158/6_4_vs_6_7_a-57013/index6.html
You see, a smart person once told me a long time ago that it is better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are ignorant, then to open it by making assumptions like you did here and remove all doubt. In the military we called assumptions SWAG(Stupid Wild A$$ Guess). We had to make a few from time to time, but we learned really quickly to not make them all the time or you will end up in a CF. This is why when I post I am (almost always) right because I don't post if I don't know and will even say I don't know if I don't because I hate assumptions. It is either you know or you don't so why speak and makes assumptions about things you do not know. I don't know about you, but I would much rather get the correct info from people that know instead of people makeing SWAGs. I can't immagine what the military would be like if we all made assumptions all the time.
When i read the 6.4 vs 6.7 thread , I saw through you. You attacked twilliams for no reason at all!
And what he said to Hdperformance was nothing or even the bias misguided info he posted was nothing? Like I said before, apperantly some of you guys "like" false or biased info if it makes what you like look good or what you don't like look bad.
He is not the only one. Many have stated how you always say all the 6.4 owners attack the cummins guys blah blah blah. Ill tell you this.... you may know some things about the diesel (or not), but you present yourself as a jerk.
Says the person who told me I was incorrect(when I wasn't) and is now butt hurt because I proved them wrong.
All someone has to do is read that 6.4 vs 6.7 thread and some of your other posts with the name calling and so on.
Says the guy that just said I was in my 20s, and "arrogant mother", and an @$$hole. I am guessing those aren't names to you? Also, please show me waht names I called people. If they were not warranted then I will apologize.
You spend a lot of time quoting people and looking for their faults or trying to make yourself look smarter/better than others..
As I said before, if I see information that I know is false or partially true then I will respond just as almost everyone here would.
And you HAVE pointed out some cons of the 6.4 which you say you dont do. You wont respond when someone makes a statement that deserves a response.
Where? If it is false or not a part of the discussiion then I will apologise.
Im assuming cause you know you are wrong and wont admit it. Please dont make me go back and copy a bunch of quotes and prove you wrong if you deny this. I beg you!
There you go with more assumptions again.