Biggfoot44
Member
Mrs Biggfoot's '16 Yukon is in the shop to fix ( totally not daughter's fault ) minor accident damage , and the other party's Ins is covering the rental .
A '24 Waggoner Series ll , with the 3.0L twin turbo . With unlimited milage .
So I'll get a chance to test out the " wave of the future " . Without any concerns about long term longevity compared to the semi old school Cubic Inches .
The numbers look good on paper , but l have previously experienced numbers lying in the real world , in the truck / suv realm .
Once upon a time , we had a long term rental on '99 Dakota Sport stretch cab w/ the 5.2L . It had great torque and response , and everything was well balanced performance, well suited for the application .
Fast foreward, and owned briefly a '99 Grand Cherokee w/ the 4.7L . Better numbers on paper , but total dog in real life . Where the 5.2L had fat torque with just touching the pedal from a stop , the 4.7 would barely move until wound out past 4k .
I thought to myself this engine might be interesting in a pony car , but had zero business being in a truck or SUV .
A '24 Waggoner Series ll , with the 3.0L twin turbo . With unlimited milage .
So I'll get a chance to test out the " wave of the future " . Without any concerns about long term longevity compared to the semi old school Cubic Inches .
The numbers look good on paper , but l have previously experienced numbers lying in the real world , in the truck / suv realm .
Once upon a time , we had a long term rental on '99 Dakota Sport stretch cab w/ the 5.2L . It had great torque and response , and everything was well balanced performance, well suited for the application .
Fast foreward, and owned briefly a '99 Grand Cherokee w/ the 4.7L . Better numbers on paper , but total dog in real life . Where the 5.2L had fat torque with just touching the pedal from a stop , the 4.7 would barely move until wound out past 4k .
I thought to myself this engine might be interesting in a pony car , but had zero business being in a truck or SUV .