Tray Burge
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2015
- Posts
- 2,753
- Reaction score
- 3,429
- Location
- On the porch
- Ram Year
- 2003
- Engine
- 5.7 Hemi
The Hemi under glass, never liked it, personally.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
That's the first 3rd Gen I've seen with a 4th Gen Vararam.
Here is the 3rd Gen Vararam: Hemi Ram Air
Yeah, that was my initial idea, too much transferable heat. Plus decided I could get a better fit with fiberglass not to mention it looking a whole lot better. It also takes a lot of on and off fine tuning it until you get the right fit, I just don't think that's going to work with the metal. You wouldn't believe the difference the aluminum tape on the back makes! before the snorkel still got hot, now it's cool to barely warm after running the engine for a while, major difference.
The heat transfer was another thing i thought of. But i figured the air would keep it cool while driving. I think with the 4th gens your method would be alot easier. A lot less stuff in the way.
This is what i did. I used the Green Performance filter in my setup.

AFE dry panel. 99.2% efficiency with a very good synthetic media. Probably one of the best choices when it comes to filtration

Not me, I got myTake a breath Casper! hahaha Getting all worked up over intakes![]()
and I'm enjoying the back and forth. This really is more of a 'has anyone done it' or a 'does anyone have the ability to do it' post regarding intakes.
As I see it, the top 5 intakes for our trucks in no particular order are:
1.) K&N
2.) Vararam
3.) S&B
4.) AFE
5.) LMI
Now, aside from the vararam, the others all follow the same basic form...same basic tube design, open element filter in some type of enclosure sealed against the under hood heat in one way or another. As a matter of fact, the AFE intake actually attaches it's heat shield to the lower half of the factory airbox.
Building on that, from conventional knowledge we know that plastic parts tend to be much more resistant to heat soak than metal parts.
I'm curious to see if anyone either has already flow tested the factory intake and an aftermarket one, or if anyone has the capability to do so, to see whether or not there's a dramatic difference in airflow capability. We're not talking dyno numbers or butt dyno impressions, we're talking actual CFM.
The more I look at these aftermarket setups and compare them to the factory intake, the more it seems to me that you'd end up with the same result by going with a good panel filter in the factory intake vs replacing the whole thing.
About the only exception I can forsee is the S&B with the scoop helping to bring the IAT down a bit. However, for the same $400 that intake costs, a tuner is a much better investment.
What might be really interesting would be to buy just the S&B Scoop, and find a way to integrate it into the factory airbox.
So, does anyone have the ability to test these things or maybe know someone who does?
AFE dry panel. 99.2% efficiency with a very good synthetic media. Probably one of the best choices when it comes to filtration