- Joined
- Apr 28, 2012
- Posts
- 23,284
- Reaction score
- 45,028
- Ram Year
- 2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
- Engine
- Hemi
paypal banned me after i made 5g's on ebay. they wanted my ssn, so boot that. someone with paypal would be good.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Well...let's just hope that's the result of a simple memory lapse and not "old timers"!!Soon I will forget how many decades it has been since my truck ticked.
If you guys wanna buy my next oil change, I'm all in...I don't have the tick, but still.....where are my hemi tick testers at? The forum should send hemi395 100 bucks paypalled and encourage him to try 0w30 hpl. That test would straight be gold, either way. Mind you he just posted favorable test 0w40 amsoil after his 0w30 redline. Before we replace 0w30 redline, lets at least have something that works? 0w30 super car, someone with proven hemi tick needs to give it a shot.
If you guys wanna buy my next oil change, I'm all in...I don't have the tick, but still.....
Hmmm ill get it figured out, i got the ssme thing now that i clicked on itTravis, link took me to no site found screen. Didn't see new product under motor oil menu either.
Why no vii? Straight weights?
Hmmm ill get it figured out, i got the ssme thing now that i clicked on it
Before they made group 3/ester 10w20 and 15w30 straight weights no VII and some on bitog asked for the supercar additive package with pao/ester/AN and no VII and they just released the specs
Heres a screenshot
This is what their results were with a PAO/POE/AN base stock blend without using VIII don't get this at all. A non vii PAO still isn't wide enough vis for truck app.
And a super oil isn't needed for mouse mobiles.
wtf?
Supposedly it is. At least the grades shown in that document.I don't get this at all. A non vii PAO still isn't wide enough vis for truck app.
Hmmm ill get it figured out, i got the ssme thing now that i clicked on it
Before they made group 3/ester 10w20 and 15w30 straight weights no VII and some on bitog asked for the supercar additive package with pao/ester/AN and no VII and they just released the specs
Heres a screenshot
Oh lord lol thank you!You're just missing the final "f", as in ".pdf" in that link:
https://www.hplubricants.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/No-VII-Engine-Oil-PDS.pdf
It was done due to requests from BITOG members. Dave at High Performance Lubricants views VII as a useful tool when formulating oils, some view them as the devil. They already made mono grade oils using group 3. They got requests for mono grade oils using PAO and they delivered!Ok - so, looking at HPL PCMO 5W-30 as an example, which has no VII additive, they changed the base oil viscosity from a thinner base oil + vii to a thicker base oil - vii
NO VII PCMO 5W-30 CCS @ -30C = 5869 cP
PREMIUM PLUS PCMO 5W-30 CCS @ -30C = 4500 cP
Again, really unsure why they did this, after touting use of shear-stable star polymer VII additive in PREMIUM PLUS and SUPER CAR PCMO engine oils.
Seems like a boutique advertisement, to me. Or maybe a hot climate year-around oil, or something.
some view them as the devil
when vii's shear they are useless molecules that also can cause varnish, no to mention the oil is no longer in grade, loses visc and cold performance with shearing.Do you have any idea on why they feel that way? Is it ignorance or are there possibly real problems? Just trying to learn, even if they're wrong about them might be nice to know how they're thinking here.
Because most oils are formulated with OCP (olefin copolymer) which tend to shear. Most if not all API oils are designed to temporarily shear so that as the VII shears the base oils thicken so at the end of the interval the viscosity is close to the same as it started. Makes me think redline is also using star polymer VII which explains why their 5w30 almost always thickens at the end of the interval as there is no temporary shear. Because HPL is formulated with star polymers i would not be afraid of them at all. Alot of it i would say is ignorance but burla makes good points about them being useless when they break down however thats not an issue with HPL as they are using a shear stable VIIDo you have any idea on why they feel that way? Is it ignorance or are there possibly real problems? Just trying to learn, even if they're wrong about them might be nice to know how they're thinking here.
It was done due to requests from BITOG members. Dave at High Performance Lubricants views VII as a useful tool when formulating oils, some view them as the devil. They already made mono grade oils using group 3. They got requests for mono grade oils using PAO and they delivered!