This is an intriguing tool.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ibike

Senior Member
Navy Badge
Joined
Apr 1, 2023
Posts
299
Reaction score
465
Location
Tennessee
Ram Year
2020
Engine
5.7
Have you tried this? There’s another tester I’ve been interested but too cheap to buy one. Still happy with my fluke and Simpson 260.
 
OP
OP
W

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
23,901
Reaction score
55,070
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7
Have you tried this? There’s another tester I’ve been interested but too cheap to buy one. Still happy with my fluke and Simpson 260.
No,i was hoping somebody had one and would chime in on whether it's any good
 

RamDiver

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2022
Posts
5,792
Reaction score
12,221
Location
Marlborough, Ontario Canada
Ram Year
2021 DS
Engine
Hemi 5.7

I'm curious about where this device is any more useful that a multimeter or a lamp tester?

I would tests fuses with a multimeter.

Most multimeters have an ohm meter/continuity tester with tone.

And a lamp style tester likely cost about $5 or $10. I'm guessing that you likely already own these devices, or multiples of them. :cool:

What am I missing? Is it the cool green & red LEDs?

.
 
OP
OP
W

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
23,901
Reaction score
55,070
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7
I'm curious about where this device is any more useful that a multimeter or a lamp tester?

I would tests fuses with a multimeter.

Most multimeters have an ohm meter/continuity tester with tone.

And a lamp style tester likely cost about $5 or $10. I'm guessing that you likely already own these devices, or multiples of them. :cool:

What am I missing? Is it the cool green & red LEDs?

.
The way i took the video was it isolates where the break would be in a wiring harness with-out probing anything or unwrapping the harness to find where the break is.Maybe i misread the video though


Edit: went back and reread it again,and paid more attention this time around,and i think i misread it the first time around,so i'm not sure it's all that great.

I owe you one Michael,you made me take a better look the 2nd time around :Big Laugh:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top