We Tested UC4 & UC5 Combos So You Don’t Have To

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

reyokonova

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2025
Posts
69
Reaction score
76
Location
Gainesville FL
Ram Year
2014
Engine
Ecodiesel 3.0
@SitKneelBend and I got curious one Saturday morning......

TESTED ON 2014 RAM WITH 2016 BCM:

So since we had a bunch of screens and three different radio setups sitting around, we decided to do some experimenting (and risk some expensive hardware) so you guys don’t have to.


We tested a mix of UC4 and UC5 radios, along with the UC4 12", UC5 12", and UC5 14.5" screens. We also tried both types of LVDS cables, and even went as far as swapping the board from a UC4 screen into a UC5 screen just to see what would happen.


First thing, the LVDS cables are definitely different. The UC4 cable is basically a crossover style cable. Not exact pin numbers, but think of it like A goes to B, B to C, C to D, and so on, with ground staying the same. The UC5 cable is straight through, 1:1. We tested both cables in both directions just to be sure. Still not totally sure why the system works the way it does with the crossover cable, but it does. Also worth noting the uc4 lvds cable only worked on the uc4 but the uc5 worked on both.


Now for the screen and radio combos. The UC4 screen will actually work on a UC5 radio, even though a lot of people say it won’t. The radio we used was a 2025 unit that had been flashed from Atlantis over to PowerNet and fully updated so keep that in mind. The big catch is the touch does not work, which obviously makes it pretty useless. One interesting thing we noticed is that the color and brightness comes from the radio, not the screen. The UC4 radio looked dull on both screens, and the UC5 radio looked much more vibrant on both.


The UC5 radio worked on both screens display-wise, but again, no touch on the UC4 screen no matter what we tried.


The 14.5" screen would not work at all with any combination of radios or cables. Most likely because it’s on the Atlantis architecture. It’ll probably always need some kind of translator. I know someone is already working on that, so hopefully we’ll see something soon.


We also tried one of the newer 6th gen 12" screens (the ones with the black back, usually Denso). That didn’t work with anything either. I’m pretty confident those are Atlantis-only as well. So if you’re looking for a screen, don’t buy a 12" that’s newer than 2024. If the back is black instead of aluminum, or it’s made by Denso, it’s not going to work in a 4th or 5th gen truck they are technically 6th gen.


We didn’t try reflashing those screens to PowerNet, but it might be possible. Ram seems to be trying to standardize things, so in theory it could work. For radios, you can do it, but you need CDA, WiTech, and a Micropod 2 (or clone), which isn’t cheap. For most people it’s easier to just stick with a 5th gen setup.


If anyone has a 2025 Denso 12" screen and access to CDA, it would be worth checking if PowerNet is even an option on it.


Now for the more sketchy part. We pulled apart both UC4 and UC5 screens. They’re actually pretty easy to open, and we’ve done it a few times now. The good news is the UC5 12" and UC4 12" are basically identical in size and shape, so our custom bezel fits both. I’m planning to design one for the 14.5" as well, and also a full OEM-style bezel so you don’t have to cut the dash.


We tried swapping the board from a UC4 screen into a UC5 panel, since you can find UC5 LCDs cheap online without the boards. Unfortunately, that didn’t work. The screen powered on but was just solid white and nothing functioned.


Another weird thing, after we swapped everything back, the radio completely stopped responding to touch until we sent an ECU reset through Alfa. My guess is it either tripped some kind of error state or got stuck expecting a different touch configuration.


As for why touch doesn’t work across setups, the LVDS cable is only handling video. It’s basically just display data. The touch signals are going over CAN bus. So what’s probably happening is the UC4 and UC5 are using different CAN messages for touch, and the radio just doesn’t know what to do with the UC4 signals and vise versa.


In theory, this means a translator could be made. Something that reads the UC4 touch input and converts it into what the UC5 radio expects and the other way around. Since CAN runs through the screen power harness, you could probably make a plug-and-play module. If someone took the time to sniff the traffic, it should be doable.


I’ve got both setups here, so I might mess with that down the road when I get time. Would be a fun project and would make upgrading to UC5 a lot cheaper for the community since it would expand the pull of parts you can use.


Anyway, that’s everything we’ve found so far. Figured I’d put it all in one place. If anyone else has info to add, definitely post it up so we can keep this as a good reference thread.


Also, I’m planning to mess with adding the passenger screen at some point. If anyone has one, post pics of the back, that would help a lot.
 
Last edited:

wollarintj

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2026
Posts
6
Reaction score
12
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Ram Year
2018
Engine
6.2
Thank you for sharing, this is very interesting! I've been poking around messing with screens and wanted to share my findings as well.

The PCB with the Fakra and 8 pin connector on it uses a TI FPD-Link III transceiver setup to transmit the signal from the UC5 unit over to the LCD.

On Stelantis 8.4" and 10.1" screens, these use a 60 pin connector between the panel and the PCB. On the UC4 12" board, this is a 70 pin connector. However, what all 3 of these have in common are that they all use a single lane 8 bit LVDS 20 pin panel - this means they share the same signaling for the display data, but they differ in voltages. The extra pins are specific to Stelantis, the panels themselves are using LVDS 20 pin for the display data.

So the digital data signals are compatible between the 8.4, 10.1, and 12", but the panel requirements (backlight voltages, timings) are different.

I have a test bench I'm currently building out. I am going to test connecting a completely aftermarket LCD to the UC4 12" fakra adapter board since I don't have the 12" UC5 variant. To do this, I am breaking down the LVDS panel pin out to interface directly with the TI chip. Then I just need to flash the EDID to match the donor panel. I already have experience patching can frames on the IHS bus, so the touch part will be easy to figure out.

UC5 12" LCD is a Sharp LS120K5LX01

UC4 12" LCD is Mitsubishi AA120TA01A

Both panels are LVDS 20 pin, 8 bit, 1 channel with an identical resolution of 1280x800 (WXGA). The primary difference between the panels is the UC4 Mitsubishi panel uses fluorescent tube backlighting while the newer Sharp panel uses LED for the backlight. This is why the newer panel appears brighter and has a much better contrast ratio.

Edit: Nevermind, I found it. -- Do you by chance know the make and model number of the UC5 panel? I suspect it's a different resolution and/or front porch/back porch timing requirements, which would explain the white screen. If the panel voltages are the same, I think we just need to flash the EDID to have the UC5 unit send the correct timings and correct the touch CAN frames with a microcontroller.

I suspect the 14" LCD is using more channels due to higher resolution.

My ultimate goal is to build exactly what you mentioned -- a universal converter that lets you swap panels, integrate touch across generations, etc. Ideally, I want to be able to buy any size replacement panel and have it work with the board connected to the LCD of what you already own. In other words, if you have a 8.4" screen, I want to be able to buy a 12" panel and interface the PCB you already own with the replacement panel. That means creating an intermediate board between the OEM board and the replacement panel to handle modifying voltages and flashing/spoofing the EDID.

Attached is a pic of the TI chip that converts the Fakra connector to 20 pin LVDS, which is what the factory panel interfaces with on the 12" UC4 model. You can see the traces going to the panel itself.

The 8.4, 10.1, and 12" (UC4) models all use a 20 pin LVDS signal to the native LCD panel. The 60 and 70 pin connectors are Stelantis specific and carry other signals, like voltages for backlight etc.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20261004_123842_Photos.jpg
    Screenshot_20261004_123842_Photos.jpg
    110.3 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:

wollarintj

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2026
Posts
6
Reaction score
12
Location
Chattanooga, TN
Ram Year
2018
Engine
6.2
Here is the 10.1" PCB with the 60 pin connector. The LCD connector also goes through the TI transceiver over Fakra. The panel is a 20 pin LVDS LCD just like the 12". The 10.1" and divorced 8.4" work with both UC4 and UC5, so the difference in touch not working with UC5 is seemingly only with the Mitsubishi screen. However, the 8.4 and 10.1 need a different Fakra cable to work with UC5.

The 10.1" screen from a Dodge Durango and Chrysler Pacifica are fully compatible with UC5 as long as they have a gray 8-pin plug.

The 8.4" screen from a 2019-2021 Grand Cherokee with the gray connector will also work perfectly.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20261004_172633_Photos.jpg
    Screenshot_20261004_172633_Photos.jpg
    115.3 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
212,926
Posts
3,086,984
Members
173,802
Latest member
nhansense68
Back
Top