We *assume* we'll get better performance from 89 but I think only FCA really knows (and even then do they really know?)
I noticed no performance difference between 87 and 93....maybe 93 makes the truck revert to the 87 octane fuel maps? That would suck because its cheaper for me to use Costco 93 than everyone else's 89.
This truck, I really don’t know. Matter of fact, I don’t think I’ve ever ran it on 87. Maybe once? Can’t really recall if I paid enough attention to it to really feel if the truck felt like it had more power/performance or even mileage on 89 vs 87. My old Hemi, the 08- it felt a little more peppy after the second or third fill-up once the truck was running truly on the 89 but that’s still pretty much not real definitive.
The only way to truly tell is to put it on a dyno and measure the results on both octanes.
But Cosco sells premium cheaper than mid-grade? That’s weird. I would never run anything higher than 89 unless my computer was reflashed to run on it because I firmly believe that unless you change ignition timing, timing advance and adjust fuel delivery in your air/fuel ratio that you’re not getting any benefit whatsoever on higher octane fuel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro