chopstewie
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2018
- Posts
- 6
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Highland Village, Texas
- Ram Year
- 2015
- Engine
- 5.7 Hemi v8 gas
So my General Grabber ATX tires in 33" 275 60 20 (D rated) are getting close to end of life. Naturally now as I go to bed I have visions of tires dancing in my head. I used to have a boat, but i don't any more and i don't tow anything or go off road much at all so I'm contemplating maybe going back to a Highway Tire in a C rating for mostly economical reasons both in purchase and in cost of gas. However, I do have a 2 inch Bilstein 5100 lift so its almost level and I like the thought of a 34" 275 65 20 tire filling that wheel-well a bit more. Now here is where my research has led to a conundrum. For some reason the Nokian One HT really jumps out at me. In a C rated 275 60 20 it is a mere 39.6 pounds. That's great. Most tires of comparable cost and size are 40-45 pounds. But even better is the up-size One HT in 275 65 20 at 45.2 pounds. That's amazing! Every other E rated tire of that size I've seen anywhere are 13-15 pounds heavier. So this is where I want y'all's opinion...Do you think the lighter E rated tire (by 15 pounds as the Grabbers are 60lbs and the Nokians 45lbs combined with he Highway tread pattern as opposed to the All Terrain tread, even though one inch larger, will be a save on gas or a wash or worse? I have no idea. I'm open to getting the 33's which i know would save mpg, but i like the 34's. What say you?

