muddy12
Senior Member
I respectfully disagree....Now keep in mind, my "back in the day" was the NP205 transfer case and dana 44 solid axles. We put 40's on them all the time, coupled with 4.11 gears, drop-down transfer case supports (for proper drive shaft alignment), longer drive shafts, etc. We abused the hell out of them in the mud. They held up just fine. 3/4 tons (as we called them then) were for 42's and 44's.
Just my perspective. I'm not familiar with the independent axle assemblies, or the strength of them. That being said, your comment of "oof' might be right on the mark nowadays.
My back in the day was a new 2000 ram 1500 I bought when I got out of high school. Still had solid axle, but man you could snap an axleshaft with a set of 35’s on command. The new IFS stuff I know nothing about.... but something tells me its not any stronger.
Big difference between the “old school” solid axles, and anything made after about the early 90’s.
The older axles still used a spindle with inner and outer wheel bearings. The newer axles (as well as the IFS) use a unitized bearing assembly.
The uni-bearing design is much more “assembly line friendly”, but is not as robust as the older spindle/bearing design.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And usually they dont even have a 2 post lift at home either
So their opinion on the matter is laughable.