I too have read soo much about using 89 will give you 1-2 mpg more, but if you look at the break down, its really doesnt save you anything. I was curious so I did the math at four different fuel amounts. Hopefully it comes out pretty clear.
87=2.2$/g (assuming 16mpg) ; 89=2.51$/g (assuming 18mpg) ; cost dif./millage dif
32gal - 71$ (512 miles) ; 81$ (576 miles) ; 10$ (64 miles)
25gal - 55$ (400 miles) ; 63$ (450 miles) ; 8$ (50 miles)
15gal - 33$ (240 miles) ; 38$ (270 miles) ; 5 $ (30 miles)
10gal - 22$ (160 miles) ; 25$ (180 miles) ; 3$ (20 miles)
So as you can see even if it were to give you 2mpg more, its essentially the same. Sure you have to stop at the pump less amount of time but your still spending the same amount of money, actually more. Using the 32 gallon fill up as an example, you spend 10$ more and gain 64 miles. YAY butttttt, if you put that same 10$ into the 87 at 16mpg you get about 4.5 gal and 72 miles.
Again these are all basic basic calculations but as far as I can see the only difference is what 'someone says'. I have never ran anything besides 87, from the cheapest gas station around (even no name places) and have not had a problem due to fuel on any of my vehicels. They have all lasted me 200k plus. My most recent vehicle was a 2005 suburban with 240k and it ran 100%.