brandonjansen
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2013
- Posts
- 1,701
- Reaction score
- 1,013
- Location
- Abbotsford, BC, Canada
- Ram Year
- 2012 Ram 3500 Laramie Limited
- Engine
- 6.7 Cummins - Tuned and Deleted
Disagree. The hub centric whatever does nothing to support the rotational force placed on the studs (shear force is 360 degrees, as in any lateral force placed against the side of the stud). Regardless, additional leverage is placed on the studs, which is the same force placed on the bearings and BJs.
Like I said earlier, a person might be able to get away with spacers for a long time, but in the immortal words of Chris Rock, "You can drive a car with your feet if you want to. That don't make it a good idea."
And the rotational force placed on the studs from the spacer is NO different than the rotational force placed on the studs from a wheel being bolted directly to them. The studs don't care what they're turning. A wheel or a spacer makes no difference to them. So that argument is invalid.
There is more leverage on the hub assembly, there's no doubt about that. But that's not going to give any issues with the studs provided a hub centric spacer is used because of how they bolt onto the truck and are supported. I agree that the hub bearings and ball joints will need to be replaced sooner than a completely stock truck would. But the guys who make comments like "ball joints will need to be changed every oil change" are so off base; not even close to correct.