Rzrman328
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Posts
- 5,808
- Reaction score
- 3,146
- Location
- The treeline
- Ram Year
- 2012
- Engine
- Hemi 5.7
If it weren't for ********* this thread wouldn't exist.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
You are over reading it. The law in Minnesota and probably a few other Northern states was enacted for people who left their keys in the car, not for thieves who come in and in the course of a home burglary, secured said keys and took the car.
The problem in places like Minnesota and their brutal winters is that people tend to go out and warm their vehicles up and go back inside their home or leave them running while they temporarily bolt into a store. Leaves an easy target for theft.
Just cripple them! Don't shoot to kill. Are they going to run to the cops and say you shot him?
Have a few registered guns...shoot him with the one that isn't
I have to wonder if the mods would agree.^^ any time guns are brought up the subject changes, you should know this by now lol.
Canadian Law.
Self-defence against unprovoked assault
34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.
Extent of justification
(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if
(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm.
Self-defence in case of aggression
35. Every one who has without justification assaulted another but did not commence the assault with intent to cause death or grievous bodily harm, or has without justification provoked an assault on himself by another, may justify the use of force subsequent to the assault if
(a) he uses the force
(i) under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence of the person whom he has assaulted or provoked, and
(ii) in the belief, on reasonable grounds, that it is necessary in order to preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm;
(b) he did not, at any time before the necessity of preserving himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose, endeavour to cause death or grievous bodily harm; and
(c) he declined further conflict and quitted or retreated from it as far as it was feasible to do so before the necessity of preserving himself from death or grievous bodily harm arose.
Provocation
36. Provocation includes, for the purposes of sections 34 and 35, provocation by blows, words or gestures.
Preventing assault
37. (1) Every one is justified in using force to defend himself or any one under his protection from assault, if he uses no more force than is necessary to prevent the assault or the repetition of it.
Extent of justification
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to justify the wilful infliction of any hurt or mischief that is excessive, having regard to the nature of the assault that the force used was intended to prevent.
Who cares? its conversation. unless we were all fighting then the mods should pay no mind. Or are you suggesting so because we are talking about the lawful killing of people in general?
As Bush once said, your either with us or against us. - comical.I'm just puzzled what the hell gun laws have to do with how easy a truck is to steal.
The OP wanted information about anti-theft measures designed into the truck. Not lectures on gun laws and gun policy.
My views on the subject are irrelevant, but are a lot closer to yours than you probably think. If your kneejerk response is "if you object to this thread, then you must be a gun-hatin' libruhl", you're careening in the wrong direction.
Point is this: it's way off-topic. You may not care, but the mods might, and the OP probably does if he hasn't just shaken his head and abandoned the thread completely.
I'm just puzzled what the hell gun laws have to do with how easy a truck is to steal.
The OP wanted information about anti-theft measures designed into the truck. Not lectures on gun laws and gun policy.
My views on the subject are irrelevant, but are a lot closer to yours than you probably think. If your kneejerk response is "if you object to this thread, then you must be a gun-hatin' libruhl", you're careening in the wrong direction.
Point is this: it's way off-topic. You may not care, but the mods might, and the OP probably does if he hasn't just shaken his head and abandoned the thread completely.
Agreed.As Bush once said, your either with us or against us. - comical.
Yup. Seems like that.just like the oil, intake, TB, CAI, fuel, and gear threads. OP's get a semi legit response after the first few replies. After that, **** goes sideways and hijacked.
I for one was serious about removing the shifter knob...
And... now we have effectively hijacked this thread with yet another off topic, topic.
I get your point, but I just like to engage in conversation. Even if I end up swaying it the wrong way. Just figured after all the pages this topic is dead and we could shoot the bull. No need to be a party pooper lol