Did you google phase separation in ethanol blended fuels , there's many sources , im trying my best to be civil with you but calling my statements ******** without even trying to check them out is puzzling
I know what phase separation is lol, I have no need to Google it. Testing ethanol content (something I've done hundreds of times) actually uses the phase separation to measure it. What you fail to understand is that 100% gasoline will undergo phase separation as well, but instead of a ethanol/water solution separation from the gasoline, you just have water. I can tell you that the just water solution will be far worse for your engine.
Though the fact that you get all your information from the internet seems to indicate that you'll believe just about anything, including all the ******** that is thrown around about ethanol. I have experience building motors, working in a University Engine Laboratory conducting research on ethanol and a variety of other fuels, and I have spent countless hours speaking with people that literally have been researching engines and fuels since before you were even legally allowed to drive a car.
So that's all you got I said ethanol produces formaldehyde not methanol , wow since that was my last point I guess the rest checked out with you , I tried to get out of this argument I really don't care what you believe , but I've been goaded into it , if you can't see that oh well
That's exactly his point. You claim ethanol produces formaldehyde. That claim is false. I'll even cite some sources so you can educate yourself and stop spreading your ignorance. Or at least I hope that's what you'll do, though the ignorant rarely are willing to become otherwise.
From Congressional Record, V. 146, Pt. 3, March 21, 2000 to April 4, 2000, page 3328 found here:
https://books.google.com/books?id=N7byI1yLTJgC&pg=PA3328&lpg=PA3328&dq=ethanol+produces+formaldehyde&source=bl&ots=c7ady0ZYiB&sig=c3J736j4P-q_QfFNZmPb_EyiYuk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAGoVChMIoqn45aihyAIVSdWACh0GOAev#v=onepage&q=ethanol%20produces%20formaldehyde&f=false
"First of all, ethanol does not produce formaldehyde. MTBE produces formaldehyde. NRDC sites as their reference a study submitted to the California legislature entitled “An Evaluation of the Scientific Peer Review Research and Literature on the Human Health Effect of MTBE, its Metabolites, Combustion Products and Substitute Compounds.” However, in another report, “Air Quality Impacts on the Use of Ethanol in California Reformulated Gasoline,” the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Air Resources Board states, “The major products of concern for ethanol are acetaldehyde and peroxyacetyl nitrate, an eye irritant. These compounds are offset by reductions in formaldehyde.”
Let me repeat that. The California Environmental Protection Agency directly contradicts a statement by the NRDC by saying that some products from the burning of ethanol produce acetaldehyde and certain nitrates, but that those compounds are offset by reductions in formaldehyde due to the elimination of MTBE. So it appears that NRDC was mistaken."
From the Wikipedia page on Alcohol dehydrogenase, found here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_dehydrogenase
"Alcohol dehydrogenase is also involved in the toxicity of other types of alcohol: For instance, it oxidizes methanol to produce formaldehyde and ethylene glycol to ultimately yield glycolic and oxalic acids."
So you're wrong lol. Surprise! Not.
And as to your point on the subsidies still being around, go read this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/business/energy-environment/after-three-decades-federal-tax-credit-for-ethanol-expires.html?_r=0
