socalexpeditions
Senior Member
Just put in whatever it asks for!
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I rather it not adjust anything and lose power by "retarding" the system ... I rather go up and get all the power we can possible get and I am convinced with 91 that is exactly what happens ... but some people rather save money now than avoid issues later down the road ..They must, yes, but it's not a perfect thing otherwise we wouldn't be able to still hear knock/pinging.
Despite having sensors and what I consider a brand new engine (< 20,000 miles) I still heard and continue to hear pinging.
I quoted the wrong post lol ..Yes, but the knock is very slight in the control feedback loop. When we think about knock, we're thinking of the audible rapping sound many of us have experienced. The knock sensors adjust timing way before that point.
They must, yes, but it's not a perfect thing otherwise we wouldn't be able to still hear knock/pinging.
Despite having sensors and what I consider a brand new engine (< 20,000 miles) I still heard and continue to hear pinging.
The pinging, knocking is something not all of us can hear, feel or detect just with our ears , that is what a lot of people don't understand .... most of the time the knocking, pinking can only be confirmed with data logs .....Interesting! No one can hear pinging in my Hemi engine on 87 octane gas. Not even my young guys with good hearing.
Do you suppose they modified the ignition timing algorithm over the years to be more sensitive? Mine is 2017 model year.
Interesting! No one can hear pinging in my Hemi engine on 87 octane gas. Not even my young guys with good hearing.
Do you suppose they modified the ignition timing algorithm over the years to be more sensitive? Mine is 2017 model year.
Oh I hear yah... again nothing wrong with running 89 ..but what I wont run is 87 on my truck ...FAWKTHAT! ...I just a simple BOIRD. RAM says recommended 89, I run 89, never deter. But my truck is a driveway princess, so do not have many of the issues other folks have working the truck as a truck, etc.,.
OH NO, no 87. I would get ethanol free, but only 1 station in town has it, and they ARE not known for taking care of their tanks, so guess stick with Shell or Sunoco 89. All my Stihl tools and my mower the recommended grade is 89, so I just do 89 on all, and all my cans filled with 89, which also power my portable genny also. Guess just an 89 type BOIRD, wateva that a be.Oh I hear yah... again nothing wrong with running 89 ..but what I wont run is 87 on my truck ...FAWKTHAT! ...
If I hadn't notice the drop in MPGs and power I would of stayed with 89 because again, I know that there is also going to be pinging, knocking even with 91
I'm not sure. And to be perfectly honest, I'd be hesitant to believe my ears if it weren't for that video that was posted (and others like it) which show guys data logging their computer and getting all kinds of ping on 87, less as they move up on octane. That's what my ears hear as well, but it never dissapeared even when I ran 91 though it was quite rare then.
I suspect there is a combination of factors at play, including gas quality, ethanol content, elevation, temperature, humidity? I just know that I never hear it when engine is cold, but I hear it the most when I'm pulling my trailer.
I do hear it when I "get on it" when running with no load either. It's one of the reasons I continue to experiment with oil, knowing that calcium can be a factor in DI (shouldn't effect the hemi)... but if oil formula can have an effect in LSPI then I'm willing to try a little and see if there is any difference. HPL has lower amounts of calcium vs RL, but I'm not really expecting there to be a reduction in ping once I get the HPL oil in.
i am a little late to this party, but i have a 19 tradesman with the 5.7 and it runs like garbage on anything less than 91. i have switched back and forth the only noticeable difference is on the lower stuff when i put my foot into it to pass someone it sounds like a bag of baby rattles. on the 93 it does not do that.I have a 2022 Ram pickup with 5.7 L std V8. I started with premium gas - 93 octane as I thought in the long run it would be better for the engine. Manual says regular gas 87 octane is ok.
Now I'm at 6.00 per gallon, the 33 gallon tank is $200.00.
Does anyone know how it impacts the engine to switch back to regular? What are the negatives?
They all will people just don't realize it because they don't have the means to confirm that these engines don't like running on 87 and 89 .... I just went back to 91 and I can already feel the difference .. I ran 89 for the last year to see how it would do, didn't like it at all ... 91 from now oni am a little late to this party, but i have a 19 tradesman with the 5.7 and it runs like garbage on anything less than 91. i have switched back and forth the only noticeable difference is on the lower stuff when i put my foot into it to pass someone it sounds like a bag of baby rattles. on the 93 it does not do that.
must be luck of the draw..I use regular and my '19 runs great.
Just put some 89 in the Beast. No issues, but I will neva run 87, that is noticeable even to this BOIRD.For funsies, temperature and elevation may be relevant to the conversation.
I've decided I don't spend enough on gas and will be rectifying that soon.
Just put some 89 in the Beast. No issues, but I will neva run 87, that is noticeable even to this BOIRD.