CostaRam
Senior Member
i 1000% agree and would add some other type of persons, but to be political correct i don't name them ...IMO auto 4x4 settings are for the Soccer Mom Mobiles and not a truck.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
i 1000% agree and would add some other type of persons, but to be political correct i don't name them ...IMO auto 4x4 settings are for the Soccer Mom Mobiles and not a truck.
So maybe I'm missing something but if 4x4 "lock" isn't engaged all the time what is the difference between auto and lock? It's been said that in auto the transfer case is engaged but the clutch packs aren't engaged. So...what's the difference?
How does it perform in deep snow, on the road under variable conditions like going up hills, around corners, leaving stop signs and so on? Normally in these kind of conditions is where the old-school 4wd Lock would come in super handy. It would send power to front/rear wheels together.
Getting going from a stop in deep snow, ice and mud on a hill, which basically is when you need 4wd the most it's not so good. Trying to slowly get going when you lack traction doesn't always engage the 4wd and if you have the TCS on it only makes matters worse because once you do get moving it throttles down so much you get stuck again because you lose momentum. TCS off quickly seems to overheat the clutches and then 4wd won't work until they cool down. It's not a 4wd system for people that truly require 4wd. That's why I insist on limited slip and carry chains and tow straps in my truck. I need them more than I used to with my older trucks that had actual 4wdThis is very interesting. I wonder why they did it this way? The simple approach would be to maintain things as they had always been with old-school xfer cases, or a viscious clutch. Obviously there was some triggering reason they went out of their way and spent a fair amt of money to come up with this design. What do you think some reasons might be why they designed it to perform the way they did? I wonder if it is to preserve the mechanics because a good number of owners didn't understand how to use the old 4x4 system and wore them out on dry pavement? Maybe it was simply fuel economy?
How does it perform in deep snow, on the road under variable conditions like going up hills, around corners, leaving stop signs and so on? Normally in these kind of conditions is where the old-school 4wd Lock would come in super handy. It would send power to front/rear wheels together.
They're much the same. The ford has the electric locking rear diff option which helps since it gets both rears spinning easier than the limited slip, but the transfer case system is pretty similar as far as I know.Are Ford and Chevy doing the same thing? How can they claim to have a superior 4x4 system? Seems like a step backwards in real-world usability ....if I'm hearing you guys right.
At speed in icy conditions the 4wd and traction control work pretty good to keep you out of trouble. It's really just not that Good at getting you going in the first place.Well, the video doesn't show it going down back roads, around turns, curves and hills with 4-5" of snow on the road and oncoming traffic ....or slushy areas that want to pull ya off the road or across the center lane if you don't have good stability. THAT's where good 4x4 becomes
critical. An older jeep with 'full time' (not always locked) was good, but not nearly as good as having it in 'full time' (center locked) when you got on the really slippery stuff. Sometimes a second or two for the 4x4 to kick in is the difference between the ditch or not. I guess I'll keep an open mine because I haven't driven one.