Let's talk boost!

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

ArmRippinToys

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Posts
122
Reaction score
2
Location
Anchorage, AK
Ram Year
2012, 1989
Engine
5.7
So obviously there's no programmer for the '12s yet but I still am setting myself up so when there is I can go with a supercharger. Here's my question though, I am not sure whether I want to go with a pro charger kit or a magna charger kit. They are both similar in power although I think the procharger produces more. From what I have heard the difference is the procharger is mostly top end power and magna charger is mostly low end, so for daily driving and stop light to stop light racing the magna charger should be a better choice especially because you don't really lose any mpg with this system. However I was thinking with all that power coming on right at the bottom end, isn't that going to tear up the tranmy and drivetrain a lot more than the procharger? So which one would be more suitable for daily driving and stop light to stop light races but yet be as reliable as possible, any ideas or experience with these systems?
 
OP
OP
ArmRippinToys

ArmRippinToys

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Posts
122
Reaction score
2
Location
Anchorage, AK
Ram Year
2012, 1989
Engine
5.7
I guess I should add the pros and cons I've come up with

Procharger-
Pro- simple DIY installation, more power, comes on mostly at top end so it's easier on drivetrain, I think it's a little cheaper as well

Con- top end power band not so good for stop light to stop light, lose some MPG,

Magna charger

Pro- low end power band great for stop light to stop light, keep mpg

Con- more expensive, higher install cost, harder on drivetrain
 

WhiteExpress

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Posts
18,187
Reaction score
3,284
Location
Midland, TX
Ram Year
2004
Engine
5.7 Hemi
I disagree with your thoughts on MPG. With more boost building at lower RPMs with the Magna charger, you'll need more fuel to keep the A/F ratio in check.

Having ridden in a Procharged and a Wipple Charged Mustang, I highly advise the roots style blower. They don't have the fun top end punch that a centrifugal has, but they are already haulin, so they don't need it! Also I think with a big dog heavy truck, the roots style will be far more fun. I know my Lightning was a blast!
 

Joshwaa

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Posts
783
Reaction score
197
Location
Lake Worth, FL
Ram Year
2016 CC 4x4 Laramie AirRide
Engine
5.7 Hemi
I want a Magna Charger! Buy me one and I'll test it for you. :naughty:
 

2K10HemiRam

Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Posts
1,623
Reaction score
177
Location
Hometown: Tacoma, WA Stationed: Alamogordo NM
Ram Year
2013
Engine
5.7 Hemi
I guess I should add the pros and cons I've come up with

Procharger-
Pro- simple DIY installation, more power, comes on mostly at top end so it's easier on drivetrain, I think it's a little cheaper as well

Con- top end power band not so good for stop light to stop light, lose some MPG,

Magna charger

Pro- low end power band great for stop light to stop light, keep mpg

Con- more expensive, higher install cost, harder on drivetrain

Sure there's probably more work involved because you replace the stock manifold and what not but you can install a magnacharger yourself, it'll just take all day. lol.

They're both about the same price wise actually...when it comes to a 6k+ part...what's 300 bucks? lol

You defiantly gain mpg with a magnacharger, if you look at the new Truckin mag, project Lead Sled is in it with a magnacharger install and they said on the way home they were getting 20mpg...that's rolling on 26's too...

I think whenever I get around to the point of ordering a supercharger, wont be for a long time, I'll go magnacharger. Just remember, Hennessey even uses a magnacharger on their ram, lol.
 

samsquanch

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2012
Posts
8
Reaction score
1
Ram Year
2012
Engine
3.7
No turbo in consideration? There are several kits out for the 5.7s already, just have to wait for the tuning on the 2012s. For ease of installation there are the "tailpipe" kits from STS and North Coast Turbo Systems. Hell, the universal kit from STS is only 2 grand and anyone with moderate fab skills should be able to install it in less than a day. I have always preferred turbos to superchargers myself, I like the idea of "free" horsepower.
 

SILVER_BULLET

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Posts
1,543
Reaction score
99
Ram Year
2012
Engine
hemi 5.7
Turbos are fun no doubt but i dont think i would turbo a ram until tuning was as good as the gm guys have it because ive seen too many end up giving up or going back to stock because of all the problems it gives
 

KGBIGCOUNTRY

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
13,307
Reaction score
478
Location
MECH, VA
Ram Year
2004 RCSB/2005 QCSB
Engine
5.7 / 5.7
Email tuning is what causes alot of the issues. The Ram PCM has the same maps and tuning cap as the LX and Jeep guys, just alot of people dont see that. When Dave was in my truck writting files we spoke about it for awhile.
 
OP
OP
ArmRippinToys

ArmRippinToys

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Posts
122
Reaction score
2
Location
Anchorage, AK
Ram Year
2012, 1989
Engine
5.7
Alright that's pretty much what I was looking for is some different opinions on it, I think I'll go with my original choice and go magna charger, as far as the turbo thing, no not on my daily driven truck, even though turbos have gotten better as far as lag and you can run them at low boost, I only usually consider turbos for like a track car or a truck that only comes out in the summer just to tear the streets up
 

talon6

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Posts
1,180
Reaction score
28
Location
ohio
Ram Year
2002 QCSB 4X4
Engine
supercharged 5.9
i am running a vortech with 8lbs of boost on my 5.9. it really comes on strong around 2k rpms. if i was to do it again i would go with a turbo. lots more power easily had. i am trying to get mine to 10lbs and struggeling a bit. i have a boost cam installed also.i just know a few guys who have had both, s/c and turbo, and all of them are much more happy with the turbo results.

with the choice you gave i would probably go with the magna. my truck is kinda a slug outta the whole compared to when the boost comes in. and the magna would help with that.
 
Last edited:

KGBIGCOUNTRY

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
13,307
Reaction score
478
Location
MECH, VA
Ram Year
2004 RCSB/2005 QCSB
Engine
5.7 / 5.7
His lack of tuning alv is going to be the root issue. There is not a safe way to fix timing and fuel cureves for his year truck yet.
 
OP
OP
ArmRippinToys

ArmRippinToys

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Posts
122
Reaction score
2
Location
Anchorage, AK
Ram Year
2012, 1989
Engine
5.7
Im only looking to run between 5-7 psi of boost other wise I would go turbo. Unfortunately your right there is no tuning soft ware for sale yet. There are a few shops that are righting there own custom tunes for these trucks, however are best shop here in AK can't do it for my truck so I'm stuck waiting for someone like diablo sport. So far the companies I've talked to said they are working on it but no real estimated time of when they might have a programming and software
 

KGBIGCOUNTRY

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
13,307
Reaction score
478
Location
MECH, VA
Ram Year
2004 RCSB/2005 QCSB
Engine
5.7 / 5.7
Your best bet is to swap to an older PCM but even then its gonna be a cluster to say the least.
 
OP
OP
ArmRippinToys

ArmRippinToys

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2012
Posts
122
Reaction score
2
Location
Anchorage, AK
Ram Year
2012, 1989
Engine
5.7
Your best bet is to swap to an older PCM but even then its gonna be a cluster to say the least.

Yeah thats the reason Im playing the waiting game, plenty of other stuff I can do to the truck in a mean time, as far as go fast goodies ill probably just finish up the exhaust and get a bigger throttle body and power wire, then wait for a programmer to come out, in the mean time theres plenty of exterior and interior mods on the list to keep me busy for a while
 

KGBIGCOUNTRY

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
13,307
Reaction score
478
Location
MECH, VA
Ram Year
2004 RCSB/2005 QCSB
Engine
5.7 / 5.7
Has anyone seen an A/F vs RMP graph for a stock 4th gen yet to see what A/F its hitting? Wonder if its pig ritch already and the power wire will dump more fuel hurting topend.
 

SILVER_BULLET

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2012
Posts
1,543
Reaction score
99
Ram Year
2012
Engine
hemi 5.7
has anyone seen an a/f vs rmp graph for a stock 4th gen yet to see what a/f its hitting? Wonder if its pig ritch already and the power wire will dump more fuel hurting topend.

not sure about stock but on a 2011 ram rt with ported throttle body arh long tube headers and a knn intake the a/f was at 10.5 wot
 

SuperBeaner

Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Posts
129
Reaction score
7
Location
Austin, Texas
Ram Year
2013
Engine
6.7 Cummins
Forgive my ignorance, but what is a power wire?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

KGBIGCOUNTRY

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Posts
13,307
Reaction score
478
Location
MECH, VA
Ram Year
2004 RCSB/2005 QCSB
Engine
5.7 / 5.7
^Its an in line resistor that tricks the computer into thinking the temps are cooler then it is thus adding more fuel. Some trucks show improvement some dont kinda hit and miss.
 

Gotanks0407

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Posts
3
Reaction score
0
Ram Year
2012
Engine
Hemi 5.7L
Magnachargers are kind of weak, I think. They pretty much add power in a N/A style of power curve. Which for most people is desired. Shouldn't effect your fuel economy either up or down. Now pro charger.......*cough* Vortech systems are good, I run one in my Hemi charger. Boost kicks on at a little over 2k and then it starts to pull hard, but since it's not really spoiled up in the power RPMs and because of MDS, I do get a consider boost of MPG, I see usually over 30 MPG. But a Vortech (Centrifugal Supercharger) makes power like a turbo does, but uses the accessory belt instead of the exhaust to turn it. But if you really want good towing power and fuel economy to go up you would look at a turbo. No power loss to turn them. When you talking about low end boost earlier you are talking more about a twin screw like a whipple or Kenne bell, they have quite off the line power in the low end. Which generally isn't to be desired un less you are racing.

Im picking up my new ram, this weekend, and am looking at adding twin turbos too it in the near future. Hopefully in the next month or two. Well see, not sure if I want to add more power to the truck or the race car (06 charger) cuz I think it needs a second Vortech head unit.
 
Back
Top