That looks like Gokhan's chart from boob's. Word of caution - while useful for relativity, these values are extrapolations (calculated) from manufacturer-supplied "typical" formulation properties (who knows what the the actual tolerance band is?).
Thanks for posting - I haven't kept up with his latest additions. HTFS is the most important extrapolated viscosity as it is a representation of an oil's ability to lubricate high shear and temp engine components - typically cam/lifters and cylinder walls.
This said, it still doesn't account for areas where THERE ISN'T ANY OIL - like idling Hemi engine valve lifter rollers! That's what the trivalent (dissolvable) moly additive discussion is all about, along with polyol ester base stock (Red Line) that clings to metallic surfaces.
P.S. - look at how the HTFS drops for the 0W's......which is why I won't run 0W year round.
Yeah, I said that it was Gokhan's work. I learned a lot from his postings. What do you think about Lubegard Bio-Tech? Can it have any negative effects? I'm using it and everything is fine and the engines I use it in work great. It seems like the density of Lubegard Bio Tech is higher than that of any oil. I experimented with it a little bit. I poured 15oz of lubegard on top of a quart of 0W-40 in a glass measuring cup (large one) and the Lubegard made it's way to the bottom and stayed there. Now, once it's mixed it will stay mixed. One of the things that I wondering about is if Lubegard Bio-Tech will change the oil formulation and start competing for surface with the additives in the oil or if it changes the polarity of the oil. Any insight that you can provide is greatly appreciated.