I got around to reading this Amsoil publication. Amsoil claims the following:
"It’s worth noting, however, that many GTL catalysts and processes generate highly paraffinic (waxy) base oils with undesirable characteristics. In fact, residual byproducts of the Fischer-Tropsch/GTL process can significantly affect the oil’s pour point and volatility."
Seems like a very misleading and highly speculative statement, using words like "many" and "can". i.e. - Amsoil is not speaking specifically of the GTL process Shell uses to manufacture their synthetic oil - they likely do not know! So they toss out doubting statements like this from a weasely politician.
Amsoil did not publish a NOACK test for PUP, and neither does SOPUS. Until or unless Amsoil did, I wouldn't rely on any of their half-truth marketing blather. They published PP.
SOPUS (Shell Oil Products U.S.) manufactures their own GTL base oil from what I can discern (see below). I don't know where, but they source their LNG (Liquified Natural Gas) from their massive terminal in Qatar, UAE.
The spotlight is no longer on a technology that enjoyed much hype but did not seem to deliver. But the time maybe right to turn the power on again.
www.lubesngreases.com
Amsoil has stated (at least in a Gale Banks Video) they do not manufacture their own synthetic base oil - they buy it from someone else via rail tank car. They showed this in the video, saying they inspect the oil, test it for acceptance, and have rejected loads that didn't meet their specs. Amsoil is just another lubricant blender - they are not an integrated manufacturer.
This said, they are casting stones of doubt at someone else, claiming their quality may be lesser WITHOUT any test evidence. Shady, IMO.