2010 Infantry Vet
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2018
- Posts
- 3,550
- Reaction score
- 1,935
- Location
- Butler pennsylvania
- Ram Year
- 2010
- Engine
- 5.7
Yeah that would take forever to make out of stainless. I'll just make a stainless intake tube. Haha
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Yeah that would take forever to make out of stainless. I'll just make a stainless intake tube. Haha
Don't make your own tube out any type of metal.....metal conducts heat from engine thus negating the term CAI.
Don't make your own tube out any type of metal.....metal conducts heat from engine thus negating the term CAI.
The shop that built my ywin turbo mustang (Barth Tuning) told me a long time ago that turbos recerculate exaust gas back to the turbo, then into the engine. Thats some pretty damn hot air. And they make tons of power. He also told me the difference between a plastic and metal intake tube is minimal in the aspect or horsepower loss. Ill take his word for it since they pay a guy to tig weld stainless intake tubes for 1400 HP dodge 6.4 motors.
Im gonna give it a try.
Forced induction & inter-coolers going to make some power, naturally aspirated engine requires different tweaks.The shop that built my ywin turbo mustang (Barth Tuning) told me a long time ago that turbos recerculate exaust gas back to the turbo, then into the engine. Thats some pretty damn hot air. And they make tons of power. He also told me the difference between a plastic and metal intake tube is minimal in the aspect or horsepower loss. Ill take his word for it since they pay a guy to tig weld stainless intake tubes for 1400 HP dodge 6.4 motors.
Im gonna give it a try.
I remember one of these debates came up years ago on another forum. Always back and forth, some people say the air thats being sucked through a metal cai, isnt in there long enough for it to heat "that much" to make a difference. Read your IAT's
If you're going to build it out of Stainless,either get it ceramic coated or wrap it with header wrap to help keep the majority of heat out of the incoming air charge.
I remember one of these debates came up years ago on another forum. Always back and forth, some people say the air thats being sucked through a metal cai, isnt in there long enough for it to heat "that much" to make a difference. Read your IAT's
Drag racers still use cool cans on aspirated engines?
Use to be like that years ago..... showing my age maybe.....lol
Turbo has an intercooler thoughJust like a turbo charger piping. Im not buying into the heat theory
This looks good..... how’s the engine noise when you get on it? Is your a dry or oiled filter?I was VERY happy with my oem box, aem drop in filter and 3"add a tube. Lots of pull with pedal comm, pulsar and fastman tb.
I swapped to a S&B, man what a difference!! monster filter(makes WAY more noise at wot than oem with add ons) wont stop pulling on top end. Excellently made, stout and solid
View attachment 145057
View attachment 145058
This looks good..... how’s the engine noise when you get on it? Is your a dry or oiled filter?
Cool air makes more power....drag et times improve in the cooler weather....can't get more proof than that
https://www.bankspower.com/tech_article/cool-air-equals-power/
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/hp-gains-from-colder-air.489172/
I keep hearing the vararam is the best. IMO it looks the best but does it really have an advantage I do mostly highway driving 120mi a day.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm on the verge of pulling the trigger on the vararam. If anyone has one they don't need anymore I'll take it off your hands lol.I commute 110/mi/day so I was looking for something to improve engine efficiency too. I had the MOPAR CAI installed at the dealership, so that they could perform the 'tune' required to allow the gains we keep hearing about. 3 fill-ups later and I've not experienced any efficiency gains. I use Fuelly to track my mileage, so no WAGs. The MDS is more tolerable at some of the shift points (I always found the resonance in the cab between 45mph-48mph to be obnoxious, so the point I'd turn off the MDS when cruising at/around those speeds). I also feel that it shifts smoother at speed. Plus the engine sound is awesome, but not sure it was worth the $500 for that level of awesome.