Tach_tech
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2014
- Posts
- 3,320
- Reaction score
- 3,596
- Ram Year
- 2017
- Engine
- 5.7L HEMI
The fluid is like water Dan,i'm not sure you'd see much difference in the tranny's operation whether it's at 160F or 185F,lol. I was tempted to bypass the coolant heater when I replaced my tranny,but then decided I wanted to keep some of my high dollar new trannies warrenty,lol.In Canada or the northern States where it gets cold,i think the heater does a good job,but where it doesn't get cold,i'm not so sure the heater is needed.The cars drive year round up here with-out the heater,and it doesn't seem to affect their cold weather operation,so you probably could get away with bypassing the coolant heater up here to,it'll still have the thermostat to regulate the temp after warm-up. My way of thinking is,if the 5.7 and 6.4 cars don't use the coolant heater,the trucks can probably get away with-out it to. The transmission will still get to operating temp as the thermostat is still in place,it'll just take longer to get there. I'm not advocating removing the coolant heater,all i'm saying is I think it can be bypassed,with no real affects to the trucks operation or the transmissions life expectancy.
I was more referring to cold start temperatures. The fluid will be more viscous at those colder temps which will slow/inhibit shifts due to viscosity. That’s where the heater would help. However the differences aren’t night and day by any means.
I’ll agree that would be just fine by removing it as the differences would be very small in operation. At that point you might as well just leave it lol.
On high horsepower and track applications having a slightly cooler temp would be beneficial especially if you run a high stall converter. It will heat up fast. For the vast majority of people though messing with the cooler and thermostat is not worth the hassle.
