I'm not looking to get into an argument with
@Rlaf75, or anyone else, and I don't disagree with him about idling in general. I just haven't seen any real proof that idling is what causes the cam/lifter issue on Hemi engines. There are also theories that MDS is the cause, or the design of how the cam gets insufficient lubrication, especially at lower rpm's. But like the idling theory, I haven't seen any real proof that any of those have been definitively shown to be the cause.
Fire trucks cause fires! Haven't you noticed that there is always a fire truck at a fire?!
There is no real proof what causes these maladies of modern cars. There is correlation, anecdotal, and suspected causation.
Is it the oil?
Is it the type/brand of filter?
Temperature?
Extended idle periods?
Perhaps design flaw?
I've owned too many trucks/ cars which have had run of the mill oil and filters in them for north of 100,000 miles and extended idle periods. Granted they were all but one Chrysler vehicles. My 1989 D-150 had many many long idle periods without any problems, as have several Fords and Chevys... and my old trusty Sequoia (Currently has 300K on the odometer), and it's hot oil pressure drops to about 15 PSI and has for a very long time.
Human nature is to seek the magic bullet which gives a blanket cure for all ills.
I wonder how many hundreds of thousands of Rams with the Hemi have gone 200K and beyond with no problem? My neighbors constitute ownership of 5 Rams with high mileage... one has the Cummins, so that's not germane here.
Not ONE of the gassers has had Hemi tick problems. That's only 4. Should I use that anecdotal basis to steer me to own one? Perhaps as a tidbit in the grand scheme.
Professionally, I believe that mass production has more to do with it than most other factors, but who knows? It's a crap shoot.