March 2021
from a Bob is the Oil guy post
Exxonmobil Tech Line gave me a very detailed response on this matter last month, but I wasn't sure if it was appropriate to post the full e-mail on here, so I did not.
In summary, Mobil has been running the FCA required testing for many months now and was expecting to receive formal FCA approval around Q2 of this year. It looks like this happened sooner than expected.
I am curious if every brand claiming MS-6395 compliance is actually seeking formal FCA approval. The language used is very ambiguous and I strongly suspect that some brands (especially house brands) are playing the "meets or exceeds" game with this spec.
.....................................................................
Each year or two, since some time before 2009.
Chrysler, or later FCA, etc.
Lets out a Lubrications Contract
This is done at a Testing Lab.
Each Company that wants to be considered, shows up after meeting all requirements
They are given all the Engine Specs before hand.
They show up with their OWN lubricants & engineers.
The Main Test is to use their lubricants in a set number of Engines, for X amount of Running Hours & under certain procedures.
From what i understand, the only thing that they don't care for, but do not Protest, is that they have to pay for the Chrysler/FCA/ Stellantis Engineers too, including their Per Diem.
Several of the Oil Brands, have removed their Oil Brands from being considered.
They figure that having their Oil on the floor of the dealership is a Great thing,
But having their Oil & advertisements all over every Auto Parts store is equal to, if not better than going through the Official Testing.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I can't name one of my neighbors, that really gives a damn about what Oil is sold at the dealership.
But, anyone can walk into a major Walmart Store & see that Mobile One is almost always out of Stock.
The same as with DEF, SuperTech brand