When I originally read the above warranty yesterday, I said well, the warranty does say it only covers a hole in the sheet metal. But, after re-reading it, I am thinking there is a grey area in the text:
"Cosmetic or surface corrosion — resulting, for example, from stone chips or scratches in the paint — is not covered."
My corrosion is cosmetic on my hood that is NOT the result from a stone chip or scratch. So, if cosmetic corrosion that is the result from a stone chip or scratch is not covered, I am going to assume that it should be covered in my case... right?
Why put "resulting, for example, from stone chips or scratches in the paint — is not covered" in the warranty details if the warranty isn't designed to cover surface corrosion. If they don't cover cosmetic or surface corrosion, why not leave the text as "Cosmetic or surface corrosion is not covered" instead of adding factors (stone chips/scratches) to it
I think I am going to be having a little chat with the service manager today. On top of this, I think they should be covering a rental regardless. Since the beginning of April, my truck has been at the dealership at least once...EVERY. OTHER. WEEK! I believe yesterday was visit #20 for me for the same issue. I have had nothing but electrical nightmares with this truck with the main issue regarding the radio, in which, they have replaced 4 times already...working on #5 as of now. There have been multiple times where they kept my truck for longer than a day and I have asked for a loaner vehicle so I could get back and forth to work.... not much to ask for, right? Every time it has been "they are all out, we can't give you anything." Every time I have had to drop my truck off and pick it up, I have had to get a co-worker to take off work with me and help me. The dealership is lucky that I have been allowed to do this as much as I have....